FNQ wrote: Bargs obviously was a huge disappointment as a player, but how much value did that #1 pick initially hold?
He was most unequivocally a bust. He provided his greatest value by getting traded away and was a dreadful waste of our time.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
FNQ wrote: Bargs obviously was a huge disappointment as a player, but how much value did that #1 pick initially hold?
Rafael122 wrote:Homer38 wrote:Rafael122 wrote:I can't believe the Bucks picked Jabari over Embiid. Jeez...
List sounds about right although I think it's too early to call Bagley a bust. Don't know if I would call Oladipo one either, 2 time all start, all-NBA defensive team.
Embiid had a huge injury concern and it was the reason why he was not the first overall pick.He did not play in the first 2 years too
Yeah but it's not like Embiid went from top pick to 27th, he was picked 3rd lol. Anyway, it doesn't matter, Bucks got Giannis and won a ring, but looking back that was definitely a head scratcher.
Quattro wrote:If Oladipo doesn’t have his knee injuries, I think he’d be the 2nd best player in that draft. He’s a bust like Brandon Roy was a bust.
Reeko wrote:Oladipo and Ball aren't busts. Are they what you hope for from a top 2 pick? Not necessarily, but they aren't busts.
Blame Rasho wrote:Reeko wrote:Oladipo and Ball aren't busts. Are they what you hope for from a top 2 pick? Not necessarily, but they aren't busts.
I would argue if a team trades you will you are still on your rookie contract. You are a bust. At least to me it is that simple.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
Reeko wrote:Blame Rasho wrote:Reeko wrote:Oladipo and Ball aren't busts. Are they what you hope for from a top 2 pick? Not necessarily, but they aren't busts.
I would argue if a team trades you will you are still on your rookie contract. You are a bust. At least to me it is that simple.
Not if it's for a top 10 player in the NBA, and the franchise has a mandate to win immediately. Just my opinion.
Clyde Frazier wrote:You're way too loose with the term bust. I'd say only ~half the players mentioned in the OP are true busts. If you were a top 3 pick and had a solid long career but weren't a star, you aren't a bust. There are only so many stars out there. Marvin Williams is the best example to me since he was taken ahead of Paul/Deron. Not his fault. He still had a good career.
Reeko wrote:Oladipo and Ball aren't busts. Are they what you hope for from a top 2 pick? Not necessarily, but they aren't busts.
BK_2020 wrote:I would say only busts are Okafor, Bennett, and possibly Bagley. The jury's still out on Wiseman.
Maybe even Okafor can't be considered a bust. He had a 6 year career.
tsherkin wrote:FNQ wrote: Bargs obviously was a huge disappointment as a player, but how much value did that #1 pick initially hold?
He was most unequivocally a bust. He provided his greatest value by getting traded away and was a dreadful waste of our time.
Jadoogar wrote:
This is another one where the quality of the draft needs to be taken into accounts.
Players selected after Bargnani: LMA, Adam Morrison, Tyrus Thomas, Shelden Williams, Brandon Roy, Randy Foye, Rudy Gay, Patrick O'bryant, Mouhamed Sene.
Bargnani had a better career than most of these player. Only LMA, Brandon Roy (not even in discussion for the #1 pick) and Rudy Gay had better careers than Bargs.
Bargs was bad for a #1 pick but he wasn't all that bad compared to the available options. Raptors just got unlucky to get #1 pick in an awful draft.
og15 wrote:What's your definition of bust, since that will determine how to answer the question. How are Lonzo and Oladipo busts for example. Even Favors has had a productive enough career to maybe escape the bust label