Chanel Bomber wrote:GettinitDone wrote:What I remember most about Darvin Ham was he competed in 97 Dunk Contest in Cleveland when my fave player then rookie Kobe won.
I remember his sick buzzer beater in Milwaukee.
Don't know that one lol
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Chanel Bomber wrote:GettinitDone wrote:What I remember most about Darvin Ham was he competed in 97 Dunk Contest in Cleveland when my fave player then rookie Kobe won.
I remember his sick buzzer beater in Milwaukee.


Chanel Bomber wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
If we’d drafted Steph he would have come off the bench as Felton’s backup
This is not true. We had Mike Dantoni as coach. They already had Steph penciled in as our savior at PG. D'Antoni was gon a ride him like Secretariat pre-Jeremy Lin. Donnie Walsh and management weren't even quiet about it as everyone thought he would fall to us and we would draft him. Knicks were caught off guard because Steph refused a workout with the Warriors and Nelson still drafted him.
It's because we're the Knicks. We don't secure our picks because we are blind to other FO's moves and are left dumbfounded how we failed year in, year out.
I will say this though, had we gotten Curry, the moment Steph struggled his first year and had imjury troubles, we would've traded him for a chance at 2 Max Cats in 2010.
As I have said a couple times, I think from that perspective and in a strange way missing out on Curry was arguably the best thing to happen to this franchise.
Because I don't know if the Knicks franchise could have recovered from the embarrassment of watching Curry become one of the greatest players the sport has ever produced for another team after trading him. It would have been absolutely devastating, on a level that even the end of Linsanity and the 2019 offseason (a crushing blow itself) don't compare to.
I do think Walsh would've probably traded Wilson Chandler ahead of Curry for capspace, since he was an Isiah Thomas pick. The question to me is whether the Knicks would've traded Steph for Melo.
Looking at the game logs, Curry only really missed time in 2011-12 though. It's less than I remembered.

Capn'O wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:This is not true. We had Mike Dantoni as coach. They already had Steph penciled in as our savior at PG. D'Antoni was gon a ride him like Secretariat pre-Jeremy Lin. Donnie Walsh and management weren't even quiet about it as everyone thought he would fall to us and we would draft him. Knicks were caught off guard because Steph refused a workout with the Warriors and Nelson still drafted him.
It's because we're the Knicks. We don't secure our picks because we are blind to other FO's moves and are left dumbfounded how we failed year in, year out.
I will say this though, had we gotten Curry, the moment Steph struggled his first year and had imjury troubles, we would've traded him for a chance at 2 Max Cats in 2010.
As I have said a couple times, I think from that perspective and in a strange way missing out on Curry was arguably the best thing to happen to this franchise.
Because I don't know if the Knicks franchise could have recovered from the embarrassment of watching Curry become one of the greatest players the sport has ever produced for another team after trading him. It would have been absolutely devastating, on a level that even the end of Linsanity and the 2019 offseason (a crushing blow itself) don't compare to.
I do think Walsh would've probably traded Wilson Chandler ahead of Curry for capspace, since he was an Isiah Thomas pick. The question to me is whether the Knicks would've traded Steph for Melo.
Looking at the game logs, Curry only really missed time in 2011-12 though. It's less than I remembered.
Now you're just trying to be controversial
3toheadmelo wrote:never understood why people said boston should break apart tatum and brown
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:never understood why people said boston should break apart tatum and brown
Tatum's evolution as a playmaker changes their whole dynamic on offense. They used to play a lot of your turn, my turn basketball. Tatum's ability to draw double teams and his willingness to pass out of those double teams have made it a more symbiotic relationship.

Chanel Bomber wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:I think talent is far more of a difference-maker than coaching. Coaching is a ceiling raiser in my opinion (especially in the playoffs), moreso than a floor raiser (unless your coach is so far ahead of his time e.g. D'Antoni turning the Suns and Rockets into contenders).
Thibs helped the freaking Knicks make the playoffs just a year ago as the 4th seed in the East. Does that mean he's a good coach? Probably not. But let's not act like the man can't coach at all in today's NBA.
Randle was the best playmaker in the Knicks' starting line-up last year. Second-best on the team behind Rose. Rose was hurt all season long this year. Kemba was unplayable because of his defense. Randle was de facto the best playmaker remaining on the team. He sucked, he was awful, he was a disgrace, all of those things might be true, but the fact is Thibs didn't really have any reliable alternatives. Again, Randle was elevated as his franchise through his contract extension, and he had helped him reach the playoffs primarily through his playmaking. I don't think it's fair to expect Thibs to give up on Randle so fast.
Everybody here would be complaining about Udoka if he inherited this roster and predictably failed to make the playoffs. And unfairly so.
Brooklyn Nets say "hello".
I think coaching is more important, because coaches can contribute to making players, and teams, grow and develop...but players can't do much to make a coach(especially stubborn ones) become better at the nuances of coaching.
Well we disagree then.
Coaching makes a difference, particularly in the playoffs. But Greg Poppovich hasn't made the playoffs in three years not because he's not a great coach, but because his teams have lacked talent. You don't win in the NBA without talent. It drives success far more than coaching.
The Nets didn't have their full squad for most of the season, which in my opinion explains why they played a Finals team (presumably) and got bounced in the first round of the playoffs.

3toheadmelo wrote:never understood why people said boston should break apart tatum and brown

Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.

Guano wrote:13 & 7 for 3toheadLowry
