chonestown wrote:People in 2022 stuck in 2017.imo
Hai.
Tuesday was a lifetime ago, no.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
chonestown wrote:People in 2022 stuck in 2017.imo
Gant wrote:Plossum wrote:Is Timelord what Donte was to us last year? He seems like a critical part of their success but tbh the Celts haven’t really missed a beat without him.
Rob Williams being hobbled or out has curtailed the Celtics these playoffs. They've managed to win anyway, but he means so much to them healthy, and he's been a shadow of himself since his surgery.
The Bucks can rightly point to Middleton being out as a huge factor, but Rob Williams' injury is significantly hurting Boston as well. Before his injury he was that good on interior D, guarding the perimeter on switches, and with the lobs.
They wouldn't be in the finals though if he hasn't been playing through pain and giving them what he can.
jschligs wrote:Gant wrote:Plossum wrote:Is Timelord what Donte was to us last year? He seems like a critical part of their success but tbh the Celts haven’t really missed a beat without him.
Rob Williams being hobbled or out has curtailed the Celtics these playoffs. They've managed to win anyway, but he means so much to them healthy, and he's been a shadow of himself since his surgery.
The Bucks can rightly point to Middleton being out as a huge factor, but Rob Williams' injury is significantly hurting Boston as well. Before his injury he was that good on interior D, guarding the perimeter on switches, and with the lobs.
They wouldn't be in the finals though if he hasn't been playing through pain and giving them what he can.
I disagree, when Williams was out it gave more PT to Horford and Grant Williams who are hot at the right time.
aboveAverage wrote:These playoffs have come down to just incredible shot making by Boston in fourth quarters. They are frankly just hitting a ridiculous amount of contested threes. It’s not sustainable in the long term, but it’s working for them now.
We probably win game 6 easily if Tatum doesn’t go off for 46, hitting some ridiculous contested threes in the second half. Those were not good shots, and if Tatum shoots his normal percentage and the Bucks win, he probably gets all kinds of hate for being selfish. Giannis was an absolute beast that game and was ready to end that series before Tatum (and Brown) exploded. Sometimes the variance gods go your way.
Same thing happened last night vs Golden State. They just couldn’t miss in the fourth quarter. If we had a quarter like that in any of our losses vs Boston, we would blow them out. Hell, if we even just shot our normal percentage on open threes, we would’ve won that series.
Either way, I like our chances against them next season with a healthy Middleton and a better backup point guard.
It's a tough call. On one hand the Cs have a ton of dbag fans so it's justified and fun to poke them. On the other hand fans who play the 'if' game with champions are the absolute worst and dbags themselves.paulpressey25 wrote:Prez wrote:You would think the Celtics overpowering the Warriors and (potentially) winning the title would make you feel better about the Bucks taking them to 7 and having multiple chances to win up the series while being down an all star, but it’s just more infuriating lol.
We’ll always be able to hold the Middleton thing over the C’s fans heads. Far more so than the Nets abuse we endured last year, because the Bucks were actual defending champions. Let’s have fun with it.
emunney wrote:Came in feeling this series was a toss-up, obv slight lean to Boston with their 1 game advantage now. We'll see what happens (Ws could win the next 4, w/e), but I think people have to come to terms with the fact that this Ws team, with a much older Curry, post-injury Klay, and a diminished supporting cast -- all still good, but just less so -- is categorically different from the steamroller that flattened the league half a decade ago. This is an ordinary very good team on the same plateau as the rest of the league's very good teams.
Ron Swanson wrote:That elite Boston jedi-mind trick defense at it again, holding Golden State to *checks notes*....42% from 3 on 45 attempts.
Much adjustments, very genius. Bud could only wish.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
midranger wrote:Not so hot take: the Celtics don’t beat the Bucks if Robert Williams doesn’t get injured. Going 5 out was the key for that series. Williams was an anchor for them in our series.
Ron Swanson wrote:Tatum has been incredibly mediocre these playoffs. Which is why the hot takes are gonna be wild/hilarious if the Celtics win it all.
I'm with you that something should be done. Of the realistic possibilities I like widening the court the most.PintSizedBox10 wrote:I'll continue to advocate for changes to be made to the three point line. The easiest adjustment would be to do away with the corner three entirely. If that's too extreme then I'd suggest widening the court so the corner three is the same distance. Granted the league would never do this but I'm a firm believer that adjustments need to be made. I worry that in 15 years teams will be jacking 80 threes a game because the payoff to hitting threes is absurd.
Sent from my SM-G981U using RealGM mobile app
PintSizedBox10 wrote:I'll continue to advocate for changes to be made to the three point line. The easiest adjustment would be to do away with the corner three entirely. If that's too extreme then I'd suggest widening the court so the corner three is the same distance. Granted the league would never do this but I'm a firm believer that adjustments need to be made. I worry that in 15 years teams will be jacking 80 threes a game because the payoff to hitting threes is absurd.
Sent from my SM-G981U using RealGM mobile app
Antinomy wrote:PintSizedBox10 wrote:I'll continue to advocate for changes to be made to the three point line. The easiest adjustment would be to do away with the corner three entirely. If that's too extreme then I'd suggest widening the court so the corner three is the same distance. Granted the league would never do this but I'm a firm believer that adjustments need to be made. I worry that in 15 years teams will be jacking 80 threes a game because the payoff to hitting threes is absurd.
Sent from my SM-G981U using RealGM mobile app
Last night’s game felt very cheap to watch in the 4th.
Warriors outplayed them for most of the game then suddenly it was over in a 5 minute stretch because BOS hit like 10 3s.
aboveAverage wrote:These playoffs have come down to just incredible shot making by Boston in fourth quarters. They are frankly just hitting a ridiculous amount of contested threes. It’s not sustainable in the long term, but it’s working for them now.
We probably win game 6 easily if Tatum doesn’t go off for 46, hitting some ridiculous contested threes in the second half. Those were not good shots, and if Tatum shoots his normal percentage and the Bucks win, he probably gets all kinds of hate for being selfish. Giannis was an absolute beast that game and was ready to end that series before Tatum (and Brown) exploded. Sometimes the variance gods go your way.
Same thing happened last night vs Golden State. They just couldn’t miss in the fourth quarter. If we had a quarter like that in any of our losses vs Boston, we would blow them out. Hell, if we even just shot our normal percentage on open threes, we would’ve won that series.
Either way, I like our chances against them next season with a healthy Middleton and a better backup point guard.