ImageImageImageImage

Who do you want us to take at #1?

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

Who would you take at #1?

Jabari smith
111
51%
Chet Holmgren
63
29%
Paolo Banchero
27
13%
Jaden Ivey
1
0%
Keegan Murray
1
0%
Shaedon Sharpe
8
4%
Other
5
2%
 
Total votes: 216

User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1021 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 8:50 am

zaymon wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
SOUL wrote:
This is opposite of a quote I've seen of an (I think) college basketball scout who said the guards he played with were the worst he could've been paired with because of how badly they shot and how greedily they played. (Particularly Green who only took 1.6 less shots a game than Jabari on horrid numbers.) Said Jabari would much rather get his offense within the flow of the game. He also said Jabari definitely took some bad shots but with the space he was given + unreliability in his guards made it so he had to try to create something out of nothing.

Blaming the potential #1 pick for extremely **** guard play is certainly.. a take.


Ehhh... I take it as apologism for Smith's shortcomings. Experience has taught me that these sorts of arguments are usually BS. Again, you can like Smith for what he is, but he was a contributing factor in Auburn's lack of ball movement at the offensive end. Everyone is blaming his guards, but college basketball is lousy with guards of that type. It's just odd to me that people have lasered in on that particular argument on behalf of Smith, because you can make the same argument for so many others as well.

I am highly critical of Cole Anthony, so I get it, but Jabari Smith Jr. needs to be judged based upon what he is, independent of the quality of the guards on his team. The hope is that Smith evolves as a player, but you can't simply assume it will happen in the absence of such guards. And if he gets drafted by Orlando, he is going to be playing with Cole Anthony anyway.

It's also a bit confounding because people are also lauding Smith for his iso potential. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either you love him because "he can get his shot off over anyone" or you hope that he evolves as a basketball player when he gets out from playing next to a couple selfish guards.

I prefer Chet because he already knows how to play basketball. He knows when to attack and when not to. He knows a good shot from a bad one. He knows how to make the simple pass. He know when to cut and when to get out of the way. I'm not ruling out his iso potential for late clock situations, but a significant part of his appeal for me is that you don't have to feed him the ball and watch him burn clock to try to get his own shots up.


People pick their favourite prospect and just ideologize him (i do it too with Banchero, but at least i do my research). It was the same when i was against drafting Bamba. Its so easy to say "you just hate him" and so much harder to have independent opinion based on research. People just create excuses to feel better about their choice.
Why every player except Zep Jesper shot worse from 3 than year before ? Wendell Green and K.D Johnson were good shooters as freshman but bad shooters in Auburn. Is it bad luck or is it the downside of having offense created around one trick pony player ?
Why Auburn guards are pictured as selfish while Wendell Green had 36% assist rate which is the highest among Auburn, Gonzaga, Duke guards? Their 2 point attempts are not that high, its 3 point attempts that stand out. Johnson was the more selfish guard but he had 5.6 two point attempts on 46.3% while Jabari Smith had 7 two point attempts on 42.9%.
I am not saying that Jabari is the only problem but that he was part of the problem. If he could dribble and read the game better his teammates would have a better time playing with him.
Players projected to go number one should elevate their team and make everyone around them better. While Auburn guards were not the best year earlier they were even worse next to Jabari Smith this year.


I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1022 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:01 am

I think Jabari shot 38.8% from three when guarded. Chet was a sub-300 shooter from three when guarded. Chet had players around him that could shoot, Jabari didn't. If you were a coach which player would you want to pass the ball when guarded?

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1023 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:05 am

RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
Ehhh... I take it as apologism for Smith's shortcomings. Experience has taught me that these sorts of arguments are usually BS. Again, you can like Smith for what he is, but he was a contributing factor in Auburn's lack of ball movement at the offensive end. Everyone is blaming his guards, but college basketball is lousy with guards of that type. It's just odd to me that people have lasered in on that particular argument on behalf of Smith, because you can make the same argument for so many others as well.

I am highly critical of Cole Anthony, so I get it, but Jabari Smith Jr. needs to be judged based upon what he is, independent of the quality of the guards on his team. The hope is that Smith evolves as a player, but you can't simply assume it will happen in the absence of such guards. And if he gets drafted by Orlando, he is going to be playing with Cole Anthony anyway.

It's also a bit confounding because people are also lauding Smith for his iso potential. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either you love him because "he can get his shot off over anyone" or you hope that he evolves as a basketball player when he gets out from playing next to a couple selfish guards.

I prefer Chet because he already knows how to play basketball. He knows when to attack and when not to. He knows a good shot from a bad one. He knows how to make the simple pass. He know when to cut and when to get out of the way. I'm not ruling out his iso potential for late clock situations, but a significant part of his appeal for me is that you don't have to feed him the ball and watch him burn clock to try to get his own shots up.


People pick their favourite prospect and just ideologize him (i do it too with Banchero, but at least i do my research). It was the same when i was against drafting Bamba. Its so easy to say "you just hate him" and so much harder to have independent opinion based on research. People just create excuses to feel better about their choice.
Why every player except Zep Jesper shot worse from 3 than year before ? Wendell Green and K.D Johnson were good shooters as freshman but bad shooters in Auburn. Is it bad luck or is it the downside of having offense created around one trick pony player ?
Why Auburn guards are pictured as selfish while Wendell Green had 36% assist rate which is the highest among Auburn, Gonzaga, Duke guards? Their 2 point attempts are not that high, its 3 point attempts that stand out. Johnson was the more selfish guard but he had 5.6 two point attempts on 46.3% while Jabari Smith had 7 two point attempts on 42.9%.
I am not saying that Jabari is the only problem but that he was part of the problem. If he could dribble and read the game better his teammates would have a better time playing with him.
Players projected to go number one should elevate their team and make everyone around them better. While Auburn guards were not the best year earlier they were even worse next to Jabari Smith this year.


I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.
Most of Chet's three-pointers were in transition and you're being critical of Jabari for shooting them?

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1024 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:13 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
People pick their favourite prospect and just ideologize him (i do it too with Banchero, but at least i do my research). It was the same when i was against drafting Bamba. Its so easy to say "you just hate him" and so much harder to have independent opinion based on research. People just create excuses to feel better about their choice.
Why every player except Zep Jesper shot worse from 3 than year before ? Wendell Green and K.D Johnson were good shooters as freshman but bad shooters in Auburn. Is it bad luck or is it the downside of having offense created around one trick pony player ?
Why Auburn guards are pictured as selfish while Wendell Green had 36% assist rate which is the highest among Auburn, Gonzaga, Duke guards? Their 2 point attempts are not that high, its 3 point attempts that stand out. Johnson was the more selfish guard but he had 5.6 two point attempts on 46.3% while Jabari Smith had 7 two point attempts on 42.9%.
I am not saying that Jabari is the only problem but that he was part of the problem. If he could dribble and read the game better his teammates would have a better time playing with him.
Players projected to go number one should elevate their team and make everyone around them better. While Auburn guards were not the best year earlier they were even worse next to Jabari Smith this year.


I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.
Most of Chet's three-pointers were in transition and you're being critical of Jabari for shooting them?

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


????

Im being critical to ALL of them. What separates Chet and Paolo from JS is that they actually and with proof can attack the rim through their dribbling ability, low post moves or thr smart pass.

If JS shoots 3s in transition like most nba players do nowadays then its fine. I hope he continues to do so
HOWEVER it seems you decided to omit the part where i specifically said that he had teammates that were in better position to score with a simple pass from him ywt he decided to.bombs away.

THAT is why i said he doesnt really raise the team for NOW.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1025 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:36 am

RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.
Most of Chet's three-pointers were in transition and you're being critical of Jabari for shooting them?

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


????

Im being critical to ALL of them. What separates Chet and Paolo from JS is that they actually and with proof can attack the rim through their dribbling ability, low post moves or thr smart pass.

If JS shoots 3s in transition like most nba players do nowadays then its fine. I hope he continues to do so
HOWEVER it seems you decided to omit the part where i specifically said that he had teammates that were in better position to score with a simple pass from him ywt he decided to.bombs away.

THAT is why I said he doesn't raise the team for NOW.
Jabari has shown to be a better passer than Chet at a younger age and I believe he can get to the basket easier in the half-court.

Also, Mosely's motto was to take the first shot available. Sure you can pass it around to probe for the best shot possible but you might turn the ball over.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1026 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:43 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Most of Chet's three-pointers were in transition and you're being critical of Jabari for shooting them?

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


????

Im being critical to ALL of them. What separates Chet and Paolo from JS is that they actually and with proof can attack the rim through their dribbling ability, low post moves or thr smart pass.

If JS shoots 3s in transition like most nba players do nowadays then its fine. I hope he continues to do so
HOWEVER it seems you decided to omit the part where i specifically said that he had teammates that were in better position to score with a simple pass from him ywt he decided to.bombs away.

THAT is why I said he doesn't raise the team for NOW.
Jabari has shown to be a better passer than Chet at a younger age and I believe he can get to the basket easier also in the half-court.

Also, Mosely's motto was to take the first shot available.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Well if you say so. Qe must have watched different AUburn games because there were lots of times when i thought what a dumb move for JS. He had a 7footer right underneath the basket sraling off a 6'8 defender yet he doesnt make the simple pass? He had teammates open with cuts like Franz yet again he decides to shoot?

That's why when other posters said he had selfish guards yet he himself is a selfish player, i can understand that. The only worse explanation i can think off is he doesn't have a high bbiq.

Well he ia still young after all.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1027 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:47 am

RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
????

Im being critical to ALL of them. What separates Chet and Paolo from JS is that they actually and with proof can attack the rim through their dribbling ability, low post moves or thr smart pass.

If JS shoots 3s in transition like most nba players do nowadays then its fine. I hope he continues to do so
HOWEVER it seems you decided to omit the part where i specifically said that he had teammates that were in better position to score with a simple pass from him ywt he decided to.bombs away.

THAT is why I said he doesn't raise the team for NOW.
Jabari has shown to be a better passer than Chet at a younger age and I believe he can get to the basket easier also in the half-court.

Also, Mosely's motto was to take the first shot available.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Well if you say so. Qe must have watched different AUburn games because there were lots of times when i thought what a dumb move for JS. He had a 7footer right underneath the basket sraling off a 6'8 defender yet he doesnt make the simple pass? He had teammates open with cuts like Franz yet again he decides to shoot?

That's why when other posters said he had selfish guards yet he himself is a selfish player, i can understand that. The only worse explanation i can think off is he doesn't have a high bbiq.

Well he ia still young after all.
Chet has worse turnover and assist percentages than Jabari. So insinuating that Chet is a better passer isn't based on facts.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
GelbeWand09
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,742
And1: 2,079
Joined: Apr 17, 2018
       

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1028 » by GelbeWand09 » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:50 am

Good that there are only 3 weeks left until the draft. If it would take any longer, Jabari would soon be 7'2 with a 8' wingspan, on offense a better version of Paul George & on defense better than prime Kawhi. :lol:

@basketballRob
Just kidding, but you have an extreme tendency to exaggerate sometimes. :D
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1029 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 9:56 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Jabari has shown to be a better passer than Chet at a younger age and I believe he can get to the basket easier also in the half-court.

Also, Mosely's motto was to take the first shot available.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Well if you say so. Qe must have watched different AUburn games because there were lots of times when i thought what a dumb move for JS. He had a 7footer right underneath the basket sraling off a 6'8 defender yet he doesnt make the simple pass? He had teammates open with cuts like Franz yet again he decides to shoot?

That's why when other posters said he had selfish guards yet he himself is a selfish player, i can understand that. The only worse explanation i can think off is he doesn't have a high bbiq.

Well he ia still young after all.
Chet has worse turnover and assist percentage than Jabari. So insinuating that Chet is a better passer isn't based on facts.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


1.) I must have been struck dumb, when and where did i say that Chet was a better passer than JS? If anything its Paolo thats the best of them all.

2.) If im insinuating anything, i insinuate that JS must have a low BBIQ. Either that or he must be suffering from Cole -Chuckinitis. How else do you explain a wide.open.huge 7foot big open under the basket yet you decide to just chuck away?
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1030 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 10:02 am

RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
Well if you say so. Qe must have watched different AUburn games because there were lots of times when i thought what a dumb move for JS. He had a 7footer right underneath the basket sraling off a 6'8 defender yet he doesnt make the simple pass? He had teammates open with cuts like Franz yet again he decides to shoot?

That's why when other posters said he had selfish guards yet he himself is a selfish player, i can understand that. The only worse explanation i can think off is he doesn't have a high bbiq.

Well he ia still young after all.
Chet has worse turnover and assist percentage than Jabari. So insinuating that Chet is a better passer isn't based on facts.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


1.) I must have been struck dumb, when and where did i say that Chet was a better passer than JS? If anything its Paolo thats the best of them all.

2.) If im insinuating anything, i insinuate that JS must have a low BBIQ. Either that or he must be suffering from Cole -Chuckinitis. How else do you explain a wide.open.huge 7foot big open under the basket yet you decide to just chuck away?
Jabari needs to drive more but the defenses packed the paint more against Auburn. He has a good step and will learn how to deal with the double-teams better with training.

When you shoot nearly 40% on guarded 3-point shots, I don't think that's a low IQ play, it means defenses can't stop you from getting a good shot over them.



Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1031 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 10:27 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Chet has worse turnover and assist percentage than Jabari. So insinuating that Chet is a better passer isn't based on facts.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


1.) I must have been struck dumb, when and where did i say that Chet was a better passer than JS? If anything its Paolo thats the best of them all.

2.) If im insinuating anything, i insinuate that JS must have a low BBIQ. Either that or he must be suffering from Cole -Chuckinitis. How else do you explain a wide.open.huge 7foot big open under the basket yet you decide to just chuck away?
Jabari needs to drive more but the defenses packed the paint more against Auburn. He has a good step and will learn how to deal with the double-teams better with training.

When you shoot nearly 40% on guarded 3-point shots, I don't think that's a low IQ play it means defenses can't stop you from getting a good shot over them.



Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


I think i must have been speaking Klingnon. Its probably the only reason why you are explaining something totally out of my point.

I question Jabari's BBIQ because of plays wherein there is an open huuuuuuugggee 7ft guy underneath the basket sealing off a 6'8 defender yet instead of making the simple pass, you decide to shoot a guarded 3 yourself.

Unless you're saying a 40% 3pt shooter shooting a 3 has a better odds of making it over a point blank dunk by a 7footer??? Is that what you mean?
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1032 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 10:35 am

RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
1.) I must have been struck dumb, when and where did i say that Chet was a better passer than JS? If anything its Paolo thats the best of them all.

2.) If im insinuating anything, i insinuate that JS must have a low BBIQ. Either that or he must be suffering from Cole -Chuckinitis. How else do you explain a wide.open.huge 7foot big open under the basket yet you decide to just chuck away?
Jabari needs to drive more but the defenses packed the paint more against Auburn. He has a good step and will learn how to deal with the double-teams better with training.

When you shoot nearly 40% on guarded 3-point shots, I don't think that's a low IQ play it means defenses can't stop you from getting a good shot over them.



Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


I think i must have been speaking Klingnon. Its probably the only reason why you are explaining something totally out of my point.

I question Jabari's BBIQ because of plays wherein there is an open huuuuuuugggee 7ft guy underneath the basket sealing off a 6'8 defender yet instead of making the simple pass, you decide to shoot a guarded 3 yourself.

Unless you're saying a 40% 3pt shooter shooting a 3 has a better odds of making it over a point-blank dunk by a 7footer??? Is that what you mean?
Chet made passes to Timme and Jabari didn't make passes to Kessler? Your assessment isn't based on reality, Jabari passed it to Kessler who by the way wasn't as effective as Timme against the 6'7" centers in the WCC. Kessler is a good garbage man but I didn't see a great post-game.

I'm going to have to watch video of every Jabari 3-pointers to see where Kessler was wide open under the basket. I doubt it's true, just like it isn't true that Kessler is the reason Jabari was a good defender.





Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1033 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 11:30 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Jabari needs to drive more but the defenses packed the paint more against Auburn. He has a good step and will learn how to deal with the double-teams better with training.

When you shoot nearly 40% on guarded 3-point shots, I don't think that's a low IQ play it means defenses can't stop you from getting a good shot over them.



Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


I think i must have been speaking Klingnon. Its probably the only reason why you are explaining something totally out of my point.

I question Jabari's BBIQ because of plays wherein there is an open huuuuuuugggee 7ft guy underneath the basket sealing off a 6'8 defender yet instead of making the simple pass, you decide to shoot a guarded 3 yourself.

Unless you're saying a 40% 3pt shooter shooting a 3 has a better odds of making it over a point-blank dunk by a 7footer??? Is that what you mean?
Chet made passes to Timme and Jabari didn't make passes to Kessler? Your assessment isn't based on reality, Jabari passed it to Kessler who by the way wasn't as effective as Timme against the 6'7" centers in the WCC. Kessler is a good garbage man but I didn't see a great post-game.

I'm going to have to watch video of every Jabari 3-pointers to see where Kessler was wide open under the basket. I doubt it's true, just like it isn't true that Kessler is the reason Jabari was a good defender.





Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Uh sure go ahead. Watch the full games if you can.i mean when you can see it in highlights how much nore in the full games.
User avatar
MartinsIzAfraud
Head Coach
Posts: 6,463
And1: 4,854
Joined: Mar 07, 2017
Location: Work
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1034 » by MartinsIzAfraud » Sat Jun 4, 2022 1:57 pm



6 highlights in and wow there’s 2 drives and a 3, a post jab step which creates hella space & then a post rip through that allows him to drive to the basket for 2. Oh and that post up back door spin to step back jumper sheesh.

Shocked I was told he can’t get to the basket or has 0 post game. Y’all just want Chet and that’s fine but goodness open your eyes a little bit Jabari at 19 is a damn good baller.
A scoring guard.. never heard of one. :roll:
axl_c_cool
Analyst
Posts: 3,608
And1: 870
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1035 » by axl_c_cool » Sat Jun 4, 2022 3:44 pm

I haven't watched it (I will in a minute) but I can't help but think Jabari will only improve.

Chet and Banchero will too, but it's fair to say that Jabari will end up 6'11/7' 240lbs in his prime

Sent from my SM-G996B using RealGM mobile app
FORMALLY LC MAGIC
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1036 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 3:49 pm

Here's a podcast that has Jabari-bias, with Chet and Orlando Magic hate.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/6Uh1yYsP9wzeR3pNQStbja?si=fv6a9lZXRqOPEc1u1PVUyg&utm_source=copy-link

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,940
And1: 30,460
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1037 » by thelead » Sat Jun 4, 2022 6:00 pm

RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
Ehhh... I take it as apologism for Smith's shortcomings. Experience has taught me that these sorts of arguments are usually BS. Again, you can like Smith for what he is, but he was a contributing factor in Auburn's lack of ball movement at the offensive end. Everyone is blaming his guards, but college basketball is lousy with guards of that type. It's just odd to me that people have lasered in on that particular argument on behalf of Smith, because you can make the same argument for so many others as well.

I am highly critical of Cole Anthony, so I get it, but Jabari Smith Jr. needs to be judged based upon what he is, independent of the quality of the guards on his team. The hope is that Smith evolves as a player, but you can't simply assume it will happen in the absence of such guards. And if he gets drafted by Orlando, he is going to be playing with Cole Anthony anyway.

It's also a bit confounding because people are also lauding Smith for his iso potential. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either you love him because "he can get his shot off over anyone" or you hope that he evolves as a basketball player when he gets out from playing next to a couple selfish guards.

I prefer Chet because he already knows how to play basketball. He knows when to attack and when not to. He knows a good shot from a bad one. He knows how to make the simple pass. He know when to cut and when to get out of the way. I'm not ruling out his iso potential for late clock situations, but a significant part of his appeal for me is that you don't have to feed him the ball and watch him burn clock to try to get his own shots up.


People pick their favourite prospect and just ideologize him (i do it too with Banchero, but at least i do my research). It was the same when i was against drafting Bamba. Its so easy to say "you just hate him" and so much harder to have independent opinion based on research. People just create excuses to feel better about their choice.
Why every player except Zep Jesper shot worse from 3 than year before ? Wendell Green and K.D Johnson were good shooters as freshman but bad shooters in Auburn. Is it bad luck or is it the downside of having offense created around one trick pony player ?
Why Auburn guards are pictured as selfish while Wendell Green had 36% assist rate which is the highest among Auburn, Gonzaga, Duke guards? Their 2 point attempts are not that high, its 3 point attempts that stand out. Johnson was the more selfish guard but he had 5.6 two point attempts on 46.3% while Jabari Smith had 7 two point attempts on 42.9%.
I am not saying that Jabari is the only problem but that he was part of the problem. If he could dribble and read the game better his teammates would have a better time playing with him.
Players projected to go number one should elevate their team and make everyone around them better. While Auburn guards were not the best year earlier they were even worse next to Jabari Smith this year.


I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.

THIS is why it’s a weak draft. None of the top 3 guys consistently elevated their teams play. We know Jabari’s limitations. Chet did not LEAD the team and I kind of knock him for going to Gonzaga where he never had the chance to be the team’s #1 option. And while Paolo did impress in the tournament, his team was stack and more often than not ‘the others’ as a collective were leading the way (between Roach, Moore, Keels, Williams, and AJ). We’re splitting hairs at this point to pick our favorite.
Image
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,620
And1: 16,405
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1038 » by VFX » Sat Jun 4, 2022 6:02 pm

As of today…
1a.Jabari - highest floor, clear skill set, good fit, safest
1b.Paolo - best playmaker, plug n play, best fit
1c.Chet - best defensive player, highest upside, boom or bust
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,943
And1: 8,139
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1039 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 4, 2022 8:18 pm

thelead wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
People pick their favourite prospect and just ideologize him (i do it too with Banchero, but at least i do my research). It was the same when i was against drafting Bamba. Its so easy to say "you just hate him" and so much harder to have independent opinion based on research. People just create excuses to feel better about their choice.
Why every player except Zep Jesper shot worse from 3 than year before ? Wendell Green and K.D Johnson were good shooters as freshman but bad shooters in Auburn. Is it bad luck or is it the downside of having offense created around one trick pony player ?
Why Auburn guards are pictured as selfish while Wendell Green had 36% assist rate which is the highest among Auburn, Gonzaga, Duke guards? Their 2 point attempts are not that high, its 3 point attempts that stand out. Johnson was the more selfish guard but he had 5.6 two point attempts on 46.3% while Jabari Smith had 7 two point attempts on 42.9%.
I am not saying that Jabari is the only problem but that he was part of the problem. If he could dribble and read the game better his teammates would have a better time playing with him.
Players projected to go number one should elevate their team and make everyone around them better. While Auburn guards were not the best year earlier they were even worse next to Jabari Smith this year.


I think that is exactly why most of us compare him more to Rashard Lewis rather than some who think he is Tatum. The guy is a shooter and scorer and doesnt look to pass.

I mean, even watching his highlights when his Big Kessler has sealed off his man under the basket , instead of making the easy pass he instead launches a 3pt bomb.

During fastbreaks when they have an advantage instead of passing or even going to the hole, he stops at the 3pt line and launches another one.

Its good if ot goes in. However, it shows for NOW that he is just a shooter-scorer and can't really raise up the team. Maybe with reps and more understanding he can in the near future.

THIS is why it’s a weak draft. None of the top 3 guys consistently elevated their teams play. We know Jabari’s limitations. Chet did LEAD the team and I kind of knock him for going to Gonzaga where he never had the chance to be the team’s #1 option. And while Paolo did impress in the tournament, his team was stack and more often than not ‘the others’ as a collective were leading the way (between Roach, Moore, Keels, Williams, and AJ). We’re splitting hairs at this point to pick our favorite.


It certainly looks that this draft is pretty weak when compared to the others. However, I think this draft will surprise us down the line. There will be allstars in this bunch.

Also, sure Paolo had a more "reputable team compared to the others, yet they did constantly dump everything to him during crunch time when they were charging to the Final Four. He delivered that's why I was impressed by him and down with AJ Griffin who kinda under-performed.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,520
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1040 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 4, 2022 8:34 pm

Delete

Return to Orlando Magic