KamikazeK wrote:KIRAG wrote:
GSW have some of the most punchable faces in the league.
and they literally bought everyone they have 300mil payroll lmao. at least boston handbuilt even though too fleeced kd.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
KamikazeK wrote:KIRAG wrote:
GSW have some of the most punchable faces in the league.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
DroseReturnChi wrote:KamikazeK wrote:KIRAG wrote:
GSW have some of the most punchable faces in the league.
and they literally bought everyone they have 300mil payroll lmao. at least boston handbuilt even though too fleeced kd.
Ill News wrote:It's actually pretty weird that he's still doing podcasts after every game these playoffs. That's a pretty dangerous thing to do since he might say something there that the opponent might use as fuel. Or what if he gets extremely heated about the previous game, and goes on an insane rant in his podcast? Shouldn't Kerr ask him to hold off on doing that for now?
For the record, I like his podcast, but I just find it weird that he's being allowed to do it by the Warriors organization. Especially since he's prone to saying some spicy stuff.
FlatearthZorro wrote:Several things that stuck out to me during game 1:
- from what I saw it seems that the Warriors will have a tougher time defending the C's than the other way around- Klay/Steph and Poole cannot guard Brown or Tatum.
- Green completely ignored Horford. He should know better. Horfie is a pretty good 3 point shooter.
- We're more athletic and physical.
- Warriors will play better next game, interested in their adjustments.
Miami_Lux wrote:BoatsNZones wrote:KamikazeK wrote:GSW have some of the most punchable faces in the league.
Your teams are the Celtics, Patriots and Penn State. Talk about punchable.
Grant Williams is definitely giving Draymond a run for his money in this department
WHITE_HOT_HEAT wrote:Miami_Lux wrote:BoatsNZones wrote: Your teams are the Celtics, Patriots and Penn State. Talk about punchable.
Grant Williams is definitely giving Draymond a run for his money in this department
And Smart... Just really hard to root for anyone this series

I would argue Al Horford's Game 4 against Milwaukee would be his best game and Derrick White scored 36 in a playoff game when he was with the Spurs. But it isnt about that debate. It's the sour grapes reaction. When you talk about your opponents having "career games" you are slighting them, whether it's their best all time game or not.Miami_Lux wrote:celtxman wrote:Miami_Lux wrote:
That’s 3 role players combining for 6 3-pointers versus 2 role players combining for 11 3-pointers. So what’s your point here
Ah so now we're qualifying things. Funny how they also didn't say that Tatum was 3/17. Again no one cares if Curry blows kisses to the Celtics. "We lost - we need to play better - kudos to the Celtics." Simple. But they didn't chose that direction. They chose essentially to say the Celtics were lucky. That's the point.
Yes I am qualifying the Celtics win. Both Horford and White going off the way was an anomaly. That is why the Celtics won. Fight me all you want. Tell me I m a butthurt Heat fan. But I m just stating the obvious.
That being said kudos for the Celtics for winning game 1. That was huge and I m sure Tatum will not have that many bad shooting games just as the Celtics will cool down considerably down from three. Things will average out in the end.
DroseReturnChi wrote:and they literally bought everyone they have 300mil payroll lmao. at least boston handbuilt even though too fleeced kd.
Homer38 wrote:
I agree that the officiating was okayTriple M wrote:The officiating in game 1 was pretty good. The game flow was excellent and resulted in both teams being in rhythm. I hope to see more of the same in game 2
get your priorities straight man50yrceltsfan wrote:As a Celtics fan, when there's an open 3 point shot, my confidence level in these shooters is in this order:
tier 1: Horford and Pritchard
tier 2: Smart and White
tier 3: Brown and Tatum
tier 4: GWilliams, Theis
Horford-Pritchard-Smart-White are money. Brown & Tatum are more effective when they have to make a move on a contested 3.
al bondiga wrote:get your priorities straight man50yrceltsfan wrote:As a Celtics fan, when there's an open 3 point shot, my confidence level in these shooters is in this order:
tier 1: Horford and Pritchard
tier 2: Smart and White
tier 3: Brown and Tatum
tier 4: GWilliams, Theis
Horford-Pritchard-Smart-White are money. Brown & Tatum are more effective when they have to make a move on a contested 3.
