if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the most.

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,144
And1: 31,739
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#21 » by tsherkin » Sun Jun 5, 2022 9:06 pm

Some great takes in here, fun to think about some of those. Magic in 91, Ewing in 94, Baylor in 62, 2011 Lebron... Good stuff.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,112
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#22 » by falcolombardi » Sun Jun 5, 2022 9:19 pm

capfan33 wrote:Kareem in 74 for one not mentioned. Wilt is definitely one of the most interesting cases, but I agree I think it has to be Dirk. For better or I would argue worse his entire legacy is defined by that ring.


kareem with 72 and 74 rings would be wild as he would have 8 total and 4 fmvps (which should be 5 tbh)

he would get more respect as a goat candidate in mainstream talk as he should
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,605
And1: 8,235
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#23 » by trex_8063 » Sun Jun 5, 2022 9:25 pm

DQuinn1575 wrote:Add - Karl Malone, if he had ring he would be Top 12 player


This was the first that came to mind for me, too.

Suppose the refs don't blow those two shotclock calls in Chicago's favour in '98 (or they do blow them, but suppose review is allowed to get the call right [like today]): Utah wins game 6, and then are the fav for game 7 in SLC [with Pippen wounded].
EDIT: bonus hypothetical--->if they weren't using the stupid 2-3-2 series structure, AND refs don't blow those calls......maybe it's simply over 4-2 in Utah's favour after game 6??? That's much much more of a stretch, though, obviously.

Drastically alters the perception of Malone [and Stockton]. And also Jordan no longer has the "6-0 in the Finals" narrative that is often used as a bullet-proof suit of armour for him.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,112
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#24 » by falcolombardi » Sun Jun 5, 2022 9:32 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
DQuinn1575 wrote:Add - Karl Malone, if he had ring he would be Top 12 player


This was the first that came to mind for me, too.

Suppose the refs don't blow those two shotclock calls in Chicago's favour in '98 (or they do blow them, but suppose review is allowed to get the call right [like today]): Utah wins game 6, and then are the fav for game 7 in SLC [with Pippen wounded].
EDIT: bonus hypothetical--->if they weren't using the stupid 2-3-2 series structure, AND refs don't blow those calls......maybe it's simply over 4-2 in Utah's favour after game 6??? That's much much more of a stretch, though, obviously.

Drastically alters the perception of Malone [and Stockton]. And also Jordan no longer has the "6-0 in the Finals" narrative that is often used as a bullet-proof suit of armour for him.


another interesting example is the time jordan had 2 bad games in a row vs knicks defense and bulls went 0-2, then he struggles in game 3 too but pippen has the game of his life and saves the bulls from fallin 0-3 (jordan then finally would explode for game 4 and tie the series)

if pippen doesnt go off that would have done so much for ewing legacy
Homer38
RealGM
Posts: 12,170
And1: 13,700
Joined: Dec 04, 2013

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#25 » by Homer38 » Sun Jun 5, 2022 9:38 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
DQuinn1575 wrote:Add - Karl Malone, if he had ring he would be Top 12 player


This was the first that came to mind for me, too.

Suppose the refs don't blow those two shotclock calls in Chicago's favour in '98 (or they do blow them, but suppose review is allowed to get the call right [like today]): Utah wins game 6, and then are the fav for game 7 in SLC [with Pippen wounded].
EDIT: bonus hypothetical--->if they weren't using the stupid 2-3-2 series structure, AND refs don't blow those calls......maybe it's simply over 4-2 in Utah's favour after game 6??? That's much much more of a stretch, though, obviously.

Drastically alters the perception of Malone [and Stockton]. And also Jordan no longer has the "6-0 in the Finals" narrative that is often used as a bullet-proof suit of armour for him.


The 2-3-2 format did not matter in this serie in a sense since the Jazz won game 5 in Chicago.
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 751
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#26 » by capfan33 » Sun Jun 5, 2022 10:22 pm

Jasen777 wrote:
capfan33 wrote:I agree I think it has to be Dirk. For better or I would argue worse his entire legacy is defined by that ring.


For how people would view him, you're right.

But those people would be wrong.


I love Dirk, agree 100%.
User avatar
rrravenred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,112
And1: 582
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Pulling at the loose threads of arguments since 2006

Re: if you could only modify one ring, either by adding or substracting it who do you think benefits and suffers the mos 

Post#27 » by rrravenred » Sun Jun 5, 2022 11:04 pm

Wade in 06 is an interesting case. Rightly or wrongly, 06 is considered one of the great carry jobs of a middling supporting cast.

You flip those and you get "peak" Dirk receiving respect as carrying his team to a championship, and Wade as a flash-in-the-pan talent who wasn't able to go all the way until the Big 3 came around.

(I'm old enough to remember the "They're Wade's team, Lebron is just a passenger!" takes).
ElGee wrote:You, my friend, have shoved those words into my mouth, which is OK because I'm hungry.


Got fallacy?

Return to Player Comparisons