KnicksGadfly wrote:I usually like larger sample sizes for +/- but that -36 is pretty glaring
Very Julius Randle like
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
KnicksGadfly wrote:I usually like larger sample sizes for +/- but that -36 is pretty glaring

HEZI wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:I usually like larger sample sizes for +/- but that -36 is pretty glaring
Very Julius Randle like
aq_ua wrote:HEZI wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:I usually like larger sample sizes for +/- but that -36 is pretty glaring
Very Julius Randle like
I would do a Randle for Tatum swap, sure. We can throw in Alec Burks as the salary filler too.
HEZI wrote:aq_ua wrote:HEZI wrote:
Very Julius Randle like
I would do a Randle for Tatum swap, sure. We can throw in Alec Burks as the salary filler too.
We can trade Randle for Channing Tatum and most of us would sign up for it

HEZI wrote:aq_ua wrote:HEZI wrote:
Very Julius Randle like
I would do a Randle for Tatum swap, sure. We can throw in Alec Burks as the salary filler too.
We can trade Randle for Channing Tatum and most of us would sign up for it
Capn'O wrote:Well I'm glad the Warriors are waxing them because I talked a lot of **** about how they would. Lotta ****.

KnixtapeH20 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Well I'm glad the Warriors are waxing them because I talked a lot of **** about how they would. Lotta ****.
Same. Before the playoffs even started I said with the addition of Poole playing at such a high level on par with steph and Klay... It's just not fair lol. I knew they'd run thru everyone.
Even if one if them 3 has an off game they still have so many weapons. If Mitch doesn't re-sign with us and he could go anywhere, I'd love for him to go to the warriors. Not realistic but I'd love for him to show his impact and make people realize just how dominant this guy really is. They would literally be unstoppable.
duetta wrote:The first game was the aberration. I remember the 71-72 Knicks blowing out the Lakers in game 1, only to lose the next four. Celtics are good but they're not ready to defeat the Warriors in a seven-game series.
HEZI wrote:aq_ua wrote:HEZI wrote:
Very Julius Randle like
I would do a Randle for Tatum swap, sure. We can throw in Alec Burks as the salary filler too.
We can trade Randle for Channing Tatum and most of us would sign up for it

Fury wrote:duetta wrote:The first game was the aberration. I remember the 71-72 Knicks blowing out the Lakers in game 1, only to lose the next four. Celtics are good but they're not ready to defeat the Warriors in a seven-game series.
Question. Were the Knicks good enough to win another title in that 69-70 to 73-74 period?
Jimmit79 wrote:Curry and Tatum are stars of the game and Knicks fans are talking about Wiggins...... what is this world coming too.
KnicksGadfly wrote:Yo was Bill Bradley not always a Celtics fan or is my memory failing me

3toheadmelo wrote:Wiggins 4-12 and let Tatum drop 28 on his head. Oof. Props to Curry for carrying him. Such a legend.
Reign23 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Wiggins 4-12 and let Tatum drop 28 on his head. Oof. Props to Curry for carrying him. Such a legend.
you are trying a little too hard now.

3toheadmelo wrote:Reign23 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Wiggins 4-12 and let Tatum drop 28 on his head. Oof. Props to Curry for carrying him. Such a legend.
you are trying a little too hard now.
Just stating the facts! Wiggins a liability on both ends. Curry been carrying him all year long