
League-wide ORtg this past season was 112.0. Whatever is done, if anything, to stem the tide, it should reduce 3P% to below 33% (currently 35.4%) as a disincentive to shooting so many.
Still like the big ball. I cannot lie.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis


sidney lanier wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.
But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.
I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Totally agree.Licensed to Il wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.
But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.
I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
I don't have a problem with scoring either, give me the peak Spurs moving the ball around, playing with balance, hitting threes, and defending well. The reason I mentioned scoring as a problem, was more in the context of Harden getting 9 free points a game on phantom fouls, or Klay and Steph getting wide open looks because the GS bigs are just forearm shivering and all out shoving defenders out of the play. I agree with you that the review process has added downtime to a sport that already has too much (free throws). I concur that the proliferation of 3's is a huge problem. I can't really think of a single conversation I've had within basketball circles where someone doesn't mention it is hurting the product. I do still love basketball, I do still think the NBA talent is compelling in almost any setting. I wish Silver would take more of a lead on improving the on court product and not worry so much about marketing. A great product markets itself. There are already mega tv deals in place. The money is pouring in. He probably swims in a giant safe of money like Scrooge McDuck. Time to figure out a way for every team not to play the exact same way.
am I?
Licensed to Il wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.
But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.
I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
I don't have a problem with scoring either, give me the peak Spurs moving the ball around, playing with balance, hitting threes, and defending well. The reason I mentioned scoring as a problem, was more in the context of Harden getting 9 free points a game on phantom fouls, or Klay and Steph getting wide open looks because the GS bigs are just forearm shivering and all out shoving defenders out of the play. I agree with you that the review process has added downtime to a sport that already has too much (free throws). I concur that the proliferation of 3's is a huge problem. I can't really think of a single conversation I've had within basketball circles where someone doesn't mention it is hurting the product. I do still love basketball, I do still think the NBA talent is compelling in almost any setting. I wish Silver would take more of a lead on improving the on court product and not worry so much about marketing. A great product markets itself. There are already mega tv deals in place. The money is pouring in. He probably swims in a giant safe of money like Scrooge McDuck. Time to figure out a way for every team not to play the exact same way.
Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?
My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?
My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
sidney lanier wrote:
League-wide ORtg this past season was 112.0. Whatever is done, if anything, to stem the tide, it should reduce 3P% to below 33% (currently 35.4%) as a disincentive to shooting so many.
Still like the big ball. I cannot lie.
Jez2983 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?
My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Robert Horry is usually a good answer.
DrWood wrote:Jez2983 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Robert Horry is usually a good answer.
Young Steph Curry.
Profound23 wrote:DrWood wrote:Jez2983 wrote:
Robert Horry is usually a good answer.
Young Steph Curry.
I assume he means players that were never first-team.
Of course I would have to go with Ray Allen.
Jrue
2001 Ray Allen
Middleton
Giannis
Brook/Bobby
stop it........we go 4/4/4/4 through the postseason
Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?
My answer, Rasheed Wallace.