ImageImage

ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
sidney lanier
Head Coach
Posts: 7,251
And1: 10,491
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Location: where late the sweet birds sang

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1641 » by sidney lanier » Mon Jun 6, 2022 6:52 pm

Image

League-wide ORtg this past season was 112.0. Whatever is done, if anything, to stem the tide, it should reduce 3P% to below 33% (currently 35.4%) as a disincentive to shooting so many.

Still like the big ball. I cannot lie.
"The Bucks in six always. That's for the culture." -- B. Jennings
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,813
And1: 30,077
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1642 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Jun 6, 2022 7:07 pm

sidney lanier wrote:Image



Think the three point situation is also bringing out these high variance playoff games. If your team is on, you race out to 20 point leads.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 3,264
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1643 » by Licensed to Il » Mon Jun 6, 2022 7:26 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.

But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.

I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.

Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


I don't have a problem with scoring either, give me the peak Spurs moving the ball around, playing with balance, hitting threes, and defending well. The reason I mentioned scoring as a problem, was more in the context of Harden getting 9 free points a game on phantom fouls, or Klay and Steph getting wide open looks because the GS bigs are just forearm shivering and all out shoving defenders out of the play. I agree with you that the review process has added downtime to a sport that already has too much (free throws). I concur that the proliferation of 3's is a huge problem. I can't really think of a single conversation I've had within basketball circles where someone doesn't mention it is hurting the product. I do still love basketball, I do still think the NBA talent is compelling in almost any setting. I wish Silver would take more of a lead on improving the on court product and not worry so much about marketing. A great product markets itself. There are already mega tv deals in place. The money is pouring in. He probably swims in a giant safe of money like Scrooge McDuck. Time to figure out a way for every team not to play the exact same way.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,928
And1: 18,284
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1644 » by RiotPunch » Mon Jun 6, 2022 7:28 pm

LeBron butting heads with Darvin AND 'Sheed sounds like great entertainment.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1645 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:12 pm

Licensed to Il wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.

But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.

I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.

Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


I don't have a problem with scoring either, give me the peak Spurs moving the ball around, playing with balance, hitting threes, and defending well. The reason I mentioned scoring as a problem, was more in the context of Harden getting 9 free points a game on phantom fouls, or Klay and Steph getting wide open looks because the GS bigs are just forearm shivering and all out shoving defenders out of the play. I agree with you that the review process has added downtime to a sport that already has too much (free throws). I concur that the proliferation of 3's is a huge problem. I can't really think of a single conversation I've had within basketball circles where someone doesn't mention it is hurting the product. I do still love basketball, I do still think the NBA talent is compelling in almost any setting. I wish Silver would take more of a lead on improving the on court product and not worry so much about marketing. A great product markets itself. There are already mega tv deals in place. The money is pouring in. He probably swims in a giant safe of money like Scrooge McDuck. Time to figure out a way for every team not to play the exact same way.
Totally agree.

Probably should be noted this isn't just an NBA problem. Baseball and to some extent football both have seen some changes in how teams play because people have identified efficiencies and everyone hammers those. With baseball it's shifting and strike outs/HRs and football we've seen a major shift to passing.

Maybe we just live in a sports world where we have a **** ton of data and no matter the changes teams find the most efficient way and everyone does it. Not really sure how you combat that.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
Finn
Starter
Posts: 2,363
And1: 2,608
Joined: Aug 14, 2009
       

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1646 » by Finn » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:19 pm

My dumb idea of the day. :dontknow:

Put a max on the number of 3 point shots a team can take per game. Once you exceed the number every shot is worth 2. 3's can still be taken by the Curry's of the world but they'd only count for 2. Maybe coaches would tell poor shooters to stop chucking it (sorry Giannis) as it could hurt the team. Say the number is 20. Do you save 5 shots for the 4th quarter for a possible comeback, or do you shoot them all early to build a big lead? Maybe this introduces some level of strategy. Go mad. If a team shoots their 20 & makes above some certain percentage, the team gets 3 extra 3 point attempts (i.e., reward good shooting). Go insane. If a team doesn't hit at least a minimum percentage (e.g., 4 of their first 10), they lose 3 attempts for the rest of the game. I'm sure there are other things we could think of.

How :crazy: am I?
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 3,264
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1647 » by Licensed to Il » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:28 pm

I think the solution is way more simple than many are grasping. Just make it easier for defenders to guard the three point line; crack down on moving screens, clutching and grasping defenders on off ball motions, don’t let guys with the ball initiate contact on defenders who are under control of their body, etc.

We all like scoring, we all like threes, just level the playing field a bit and coaches will hunt for other advantages.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,143
And1: 41,679
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1648 » by emunney » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:29 pm

Licensed to Il wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Licensed to Il wrote:There are some funny wise ass comments in this thread.

But there are some legit points, I think the NBA could really clean up the game (if they wanted to) with more consistent officiating (less superstar leniency), taking away the Bam and Draymond comically moving screens, and calling post play tighter (they let you wail on post players). I think these are all subtle changes that the talking head types wouldn't even notice. But that would lead to a much more watchable product.

I think the reason this won't happen, is that the TV ratings go up when scoring is up, and superstars are putting up mega stats. The league is listening to the casuals, not the league pass junkies.
I don't have an issue with scoring. I'm old enough to remember the 90s, we don't need to go back to ugly rock fights. Just give me a little more variety vs every team shooting a million 3s a game.

Non 3 related the god damn take foul needs to go, fast breaks are fun. Also they need to take a hard look at the replay system, currently it absolutely kills the flow.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


I don't have a problem with scoring either, give me the peak Spurs moving the ball around, playing with balance, hitting threes, and defending well. The reason I mentioned scoring as a problem, was more in the context of Harden getting 9 free points a game on phantom fouls, or Klay and Steph getting wide open looks because the GS bigs are just forearm shivering and all out shoving defenders out of the play. I agree with you that the review process has added downtime to a sport that already has too much (free throws). I concur that the proliferation of 3's is a huge problem. I can't really think of a single conversation I've had within basketball circles where someone doesn't mention it is hurting the product. I do still love basketball, I do still think the NBA talent is compelling in almost any setting. I wish Silver would take more of a lead on improving the on court product and not worry so much about marketing. A great product markets itself. There are already mega tv deals in place. The money is pouring in. He probably swims in a giant safe of money like Scrooge McDuck. Time to figure out a way for every team not to play the exact same way.


I don't agree that every team plays the same way but I agree that the core of the solution is basically just to ENFORCE EXISTING RULES properly. Stop discouraging interior play by rewarding flopping. Stop encouraging perimeter play by allowing illegal screens. I don't know how to incentivize taking midrange jumpers -- I think the incentive is right there for individual players to develop that skill, because you can get that shot whenever you want. If you want to be a hero, get automatic from 18 feet.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,143
And1: 41,679
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1649 » by emunney » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:42 pm

Mr. Mandelbaum, please.

Read on Twitter


It's go time!
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,081
And1: 30,089
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1650 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Jun 6, 2022 8:56 pm

Remember that first month of the season when literally everyone was cheering the refs not calling the Harden/Trae foul-baiting stuff? Just go back to that and stop letting dudes like Bam, Draymond, Horford, etc. pass-block on screens like they're NFL offensive lineman. It's that simple, but the NBA has no one to blame but themselves because they actively enable the foul and 3PT grifters in their never-ending goal to make every game a 130-125 track meet.

David Stern might have been a Grade-A douchebag, but he ultimately knew at certain junctures in the league lifecycle when the rules needed amending to balance offense/defense and improve the overall product, and knew how to get all the owners on board. Silver on the other hand, is spineless. We're now in the 9th straight season of 3PT attempts increasing an average of 13-15% every year, but they don't care and if anything, their complete inaction shows that this is precisely what the league office wants...
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 3,264
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1651 » by Licensed to Il » Mon Jun 6, 2022 9:15 pm

Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?

My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1652 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jun 6, 2022 9:46 pm

Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?

My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,957
And1: 22,292
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1653 » by VooDoo7 » Mon Jun 6, 2022 9:59 pm

Listening to the Celtics cry about the refs after every loss is really something. Jalen Brown saying Draymond was trying to pull his shorts down when they were on the ground during the foul on his 3-pt attempt...GTFO you clown. BTW, I can't stand Draymond either.
User avatar
Jez2983
RealGM
Posts: 18,117
And1: 8,235
Joined: Dec 10, 2006
Location: #team56.4%eFG
   

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1654 » by Jez2983 » Mon Jun 6, 2022 11:03 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?

My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Robert Horry is usually a good answer.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.

"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,496
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1655 » by DrWood » Mon Jun 6, 2022 11:24 pm

sidney lanier wrote:Image

League-wide ORtg this past season was 112.0. Whatever is done, if anything, to stem the tide, it should reduce 3P% to below 33% (currently 35.4%) as a disincentive to shooting so many.

Still like the big ball. I cannot lie.

I can't find 2p% for teams (I don't have time to calculate it right now), but I think teams are shooting 2pt shots better than 50%. So if your point is to make 3p% comparable it would be 2/3rds what the 2p% is. For example, if 2p% is 54%, a "balanced" 3p% would be 36%
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,496
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1656 » by DrWood » Mon Jun 6, 2022 11:26 pm

Jez2983 wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?

My answer, Rasheed Wallace.
Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Robert Horry is usually a good answer.

Young Steph Curry.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,949
And1: 8,597
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1657 » by Profound23 » Tue Jun 7, 2022 12:05 am

DrWood wrote:
Jez2983 wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Mugsy Boges. No basketball reasons it was just fun to watch that little dude play.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Robert Horry is usually a good answer.

Young Steph Curry.



I assume he means players that were never first-team.

Of course I would have to go with Ray Allen.

Jrue
2001 Ray Allen
Middleton
Giannis
Brook/Bobby


stop it........we go 4/4/4/4 through the postseason
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 36,031
And1: 11,944
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1658 » by MikeIsGood » Tue Jun 7, 2022 12:18 am

Profound23 wrote:
DrWood wrote:
Jez2983 wrote:
Robert Horry is usually a good answer.

Young Steph Curry.



I assume he means players that were never first-team.

Of course I would have to go with Ray Allen.

Jrue
2001 Ray Allen
Middleton
Giannis
Brook/Bobby


stop it........we go 4/4/4/4 through the postseason


This is the homerun pick IMO, but it also feels a little off picking a 10x all-star and top-75 all time player :D

I'll keep in the same vein though and take Klay Thompson. Prime Klay's shooting and defense would be wonderful.
KidA24
RealGM
Posts: 11,138
And1: 11,508
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1659 » by KidA24 » Tue Jun 7, 2022 12:19 am

Licensed to Il wrote:Here is a (maybe) fun question. What “non first team” (you can’t pick a top 5 guy) player from a previous decade would be the perfect fit for the 2022-23 Bucks?

My answer, Rasheed Wallace.


Mark Price or Terry Porter.
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"

Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,834
And1: 5,627
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1660 » by drew881 » Tue Jun 7, 2022 12:36 am

emunney wrote:Mr. Mandelbaum, please.

Read on Twitter


It's go time!


Lots of PJ quotes in that presser that will make some board members here look towards a cliff to jump from.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks