[Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- WuTang_CMB
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,529
- And1: 51,957
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
?s=21&t=NCIqnGmcQ8v6tinI6rqaiw
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- OakleyDokely
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,017
- And1: 68,358
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: 416
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
One thing that isn't talked about enough is that OG has been amazing in the playoffs. It makes sense though, he's really built for a game that slows down, becomes more physical and where length, versatility and shooting are even more important.
In his career, in the playoffs, he has shooting splits of 48.6 FG / 39.6 3PT / 69.1 FT / 60.5 TS
In his career, in the playoffs, he has shooting splits of 48.6 FG / 39.6 3PT / 69.1 FT / 60.5 TS
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
Masai4PM
- Junior
- Posts: 362
- And1: 872
- Joined: Aug 10, 2020
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- OakleyDokely
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,017
- And1: 68,358
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: 416
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
mihaic
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,713
- And1: 3,863
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
yt_boi wrote:720 wrote:yt_boi wrote:Gobert is 29 currently, and contract aside, you're silly to think gobert wouldn't be leaps and bounds better than any C we have.
Only reason people are even considering trading og is cus og, Pascal and barnes are all very similar...none can play c or sg full time.
In case u still don't understand, im saying don't trade og
Bro Gobert is going to make 37 million next season, 40 million after that. To get Gobert it wouldn’t just be OG. We would have to add more to make the contracts works. And I’m sorry but losing OG and adding Gobert wont make us better. He provides very little on offense (nothing more than dump off dunks and layups). Other teams will go small ball and kill us. Also allocating 37-40 million a year to a center in his 30s ain’t the move.
Also he’s literally turning 30 later this month and before the season starts. Unless you think the season starts next week or something he doesn’t fall into your “late 20s” criteria.
Just wrong and off bud.
I guess you don't know what contract aside means...compression bud, work on it
Even if we ignore the contract I don't like it. Gobert will be inside the paint and take away from Pascal and Scottie's strengths. OG actually fits real well with those 2. Just wait for the catch or cut occasionally, simple offense for him.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
mihaic
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,713
- And1: 3,863
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
yt_boi wrote:720 wrote:yt_boi wrote:Gobert is 29 currently, and contract aside, you're silly to think gobert wouldn't be leaps and bounds better than any C we have.
Only reason people are even considering trading og is cus og, Pascal and barnes are all very similar...none can play c or sg full time.
In case u still don't understand, im saying don't trade og
Bro Gobert is going to make 37 million next season, 40 million after that. To get Gobert it wouldn’t just be OG. We would have to add more to make the contracts works. And I’m sorry but losing OG and adding Gobert wont make us better. He provides very little on offense (nothing more than dump off dunks and layups). Other teams will go small ball and kill us. Also allocating 37-40 million a year to a center in his 30s ain’t the move.
Also he’s literally turning 30 later this month and before the season starts. Unless you think the season starts next week or something he doesn’t fall into your “late 20s” criteria.
Just wrong and off bud.
I guess you don't know what contract aside means...compression bud, work on it
Even if we ignore the contract I don't like it. Gobert will be inside the paint and take away from Pascal and Scottie's strengths. OG actually fits real well with those 2. Just wait for the catch/shoot or cut occasionally, simple offense for him. Can Gobert help with that?
Also, OG can defend the paint but Gobert cannot defend the perimeter, based on playoffs games I watched.
Gobert is a good player but we would need to revamp the roster to make it work In my opinion.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
Madhouse
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,323
- And1: 9,892
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
That he is upset or not should have never been the question. Nothing was pointing to it, he knows his role on the team.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
Madhouse
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,323
- And1: 9,892
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
mihaic wrote:yt_boi wrote:720 wrote:Bro Gobert is going to make 37 million next season, 40 million after that. To get Gobert it wouldn’t just be OG. We would have to add more to make the contracts works. And I’m sorry but losing OG and adding Gobert wont make us better. He provides very little on offense (nothing more than dump off dunks and layups). Other teams will go small ball and kill us. Also allocating 37-40 million a year to a center in his 30s ain’t the move.
Also he’s literally turning 30 later this month and before the season starts. Unless you think the season starts next week or something he doesn’t fall into your “late 20s” criteria.
Just wrong and off bud.
I guess you don't know what contract aside means...compression bud, work on it
Even if we ignore the contract I don't like it. Gobert will be inside the paint and take away from Pascal and Scottie's strengths. OG actually fits real well with those 2. Just wait for the catch/shoot or cut occasionally, simple offense for him. Can Gobert help with that?
Also, OG can defend the paint but Gobert cannot defend the perimeter, based on playoffs games I watched.
Gobert is a good player but we would need to revamp the roster to make it work In my opinion.
I mean, you are not wrong but nobody on this team can truly defend the paint WELL except Precious. And Gobert is a tier above him, so we are talking about a massive improvement in that area.
That it creates a lot of other issues with the contract, value, age, spacing etc. is true and I would lean towards no to Gobert but defensively his impact would be HUGE.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- WuTang_CMB
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,529
- And1: 51,957
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
anotherhomer
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,969
- And1: 3,550
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
There you have it...og isn't going anywhere
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- Badonkadonk
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,933
- And1: 12,543
- Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
WuTang_OG wrote:
I just saw that. Thank god we have a competent FO that can properly value its assets.

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
tecumseh18
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,119
- And1: 11,357
- Joined: Feb 20, 2006
- Location: Big green house
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- Johnny Bball
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,895
- And1: 59,262
- Joined: Feb 01, 2015
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
PhilBlackson wrote:Lord_Zedd wrote:So we trading OG for a 7th pick that could potentially be as good as OG?
The obvious belief would be that they could be better.
Not so obvious when it's real life, apparently.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
alienchild
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,473
- And1: 17,191
- Joined: Jan 05, 2012
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
Johnny Bball wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:Lord_Zedd wrote:So we trading OG for a 7th pick that could potentially be as good as OG?
The obvious belief would be that they could be better.
Not so obvious when it's real life, apparently.
This is Real GM, not real life.
Everybody is losing their freaking minds. Nutbars and wingnuts have infested this forum. We've become a public lavatory without cleaning staff.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
Madhouse
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,323
- And1: 9,892
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
anotherhomer wrote:There you have it...og isn't going anywhere
that doesn't mean that, lol. He just isn't unhappy. He also has no reason to be.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- WuTang_CMB
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,529
- And1: 51,957
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- Psubs
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,833
- And1: 11,899
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Toronto
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
I just read that John Collins might go to Portland for #7.
I'd say #7 and Justise Winslow for John Collins and Kevin Knox's rights.
I would want the 4th pick for OG. I would sweeten with Flynn.
I'd say #7 and Justise Winslow for John Collins and Kevin Knox's rights.
I would want the 4th pick for OG. I would sweeten with Flynn.

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- WaltFrazier
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,950
- And1: 31,483
- Joined: Jan 21, 2006
- Location: Ontario Canada
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
Badonkadonk wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:
I just saw that. Thank god we have a competent FO that can properly value its assets.
Lock it up, thread over
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
-
Madhouse
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,323
- And1: 9,892
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
Psubs wrote:I just read that John Collins might go to Portland for #7.
I'd say #7 and Justise Winslow for John Collins and Kevin Knox's rights.
I would want the 4th pick for OG. I would sweeten with Flynn.
We wouldn't decline the 4th but no way Sacramento is offering that pick.
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
- Psubs
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,833
- And1: 11,899
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Toronto
Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy
WaltFrazier wrote:Badonkadonk wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:
I just saw that. Thank god we have a competent FO that can properly value its assets.
Lock it up, thread over
He actually had a chance to have a bigger role in the playoffs when they team needed it and he didn't come through. He's clutch but a much higher usage isn't good for him.












