Klomp wrote:Norseman79 wrote:What seems stupid is very few PGs and very few PF/C seem to be worked out. And I am referring to ranked ones.
There are a couple of things I read into this.
First of all, Finch doesn't really use true traditional PGs. McLaughlin is about the only one and he barely got time on the court because we have Russell and Beverley in front of him.
Second of all, if you are looking at those as the biggest positional needs, I think it speaks to the philosophy of not drafting to fill needs. Use free agency and trades to fill your needs, especially when situated later in the round.
I mean, they've worked out Montero, Davison and Hardy (if you think he's a scoring PG), not to mention they interviewed Chandler (not sure if there's a workout planned). So they've looked into most of the PGs in the draft so far, the only glaring omission would be Washington and maybe Terry.
In regards to how Finch uses PGs, he basically laid out what he wants when he was discussing the JMac/DLo thing; he wants a PG that gets the ball up the floor quickly, gets the team into their sets, then moves off ball and can make plays as a secondary playmaker when/if the ball comes back to him. I think this is why DLo chafes a bit there because he's more of a hold it, hunt for a "good" shot kind of guy.
And I don't get the PF/C comment. Cs, sure, but I doubt many if any of the top guys are trying to get drafted here due to lack of opportunity. PFs, we've worked out Liddell, Eason and Jovic, who are all the guys ranked around #19. If people are upset we haven't worked out guys like Williams or Sochan...uh, it takes 2 to tango there. You can't force someone to come in for a workout and we're far enough removed from the lottery that it makes little sense for those guys to bother coming here.