Explain how these players are better than Robinson

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,522
And1: 8,070
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#21 » by G35 » Tue Jun 14, 2022 4:29 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
migya wrote:There's been much talk recently here about to 10, top 20 or so rankings. Robinson has constantly been placed around 15-20. I don't understand how some players mentioned ahead of him had better careers so give your reasonings :

Players mentioned -

Garnett, Nowitzki, Curry, DrJ, Durant, Moses, CP, Nash.

Name other players of you want.


Let's see:

Garnett - more fluid agility, quicker anticipation, better communicator, better ball handler, better facilitator, better shooter, much better longevity.

Curry - hard to compare skill vs skill, but I'm very impressed with Curry's impact on winning, and at this point have him having more Top 5 years than Robinson had.

Nowitzki & Erving - I believe I had Robinson higher last time I did the analysis. If I didn't, probably because of longevity.

Durant, Moses, CP & Nash - definitely have Robinson higher



I see why we differ on KG.

I don't think KG is more fluid, or greater agility than Robinson at all. I don't know how to judge KG being a better ball handler, they never asked Robinson to be a ball handler, mostly because that would have been dumb.

Do you think Giannis is a better ball handler than KG because he can dribble end to end.

The problem with KG is that the things he was good at being are things that you don't really need from a big man. I would give up KG's ball handling if he was more efficient. I would give up KG's facilitating if he was a better rim protector.....
I'm so tired of the typical......
SickMother
Senior
Posts: 677
And1: 634
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#22 » by SickMother » Tue Jun 14, 2022 4:43 pm

Of the players listed, I only have Curry (9-12 tier) ahead of DRob (13-19 tier). Garnett, Nowitzki, Dr. J & Durant I have with the Admiral in the 13-19 tier and then Moses, CP & Nash are 20s and beyond for me.

As to Garnett being a better shooter, that may have been the case, but he wasn't a more efficient scorer with a career 105 TS+ and only three individual seasons above Admiral's career 110 TS+.

For all the talk of Admiral being a playoff letdown, he also has Garnett beat in the postseason with 23.0 PER | .547 TS% | 17.5 WS | .199 WS/48 | 6.2 BPM compared to 21.1 PER | .525 TS% | 16.4 WS | .149 WS/48 | 5.1 BPM for Garnett.
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#23 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:27 pm

70sFan wrote:
migya wrote:Don't think Garnett's and Nowitzki's extra seasons make their careers any better. Robinson from 99-01 is more effective than both at the same point in their careers.

1990-01 Robinson vs 1999-10 Garnett is a good discussion indeed, but Garnett also has 1997, 1998 and 2011-12 which gives a lot of career value. It doesn't help that Robinson didn't play in 1996/97 either, shortening his already short prime.

Dirk's relevant career is much longer than Robinson's as well: 2001-16 vs 1990-01 basically. I think Robinson was a better player, that's why I have them extremely close (18th vs 19th on my list), but it's foolish to argue that Dirk has no longevity advantage.

How is Curry's prime better? So far is been at best ten years and average defense. Robinson was a better scorer to me. Many now see shooting as the best scoring but players like Shaq, Olajuwon, Duncan and Robinson show that it isn't. Give Robinson Klay in the 90s and he's scoring even more.

Curry just has one of the most impressive finals series of his career against ATG Celtics defense and you still believe that Robinson is a better scorer? The same Robinson who never scored well against quality defense in postseason? That's wishful thinking, Robinson has no case over Curry as a scorer.


Robinson was totally exposed
Dooley
Sophomore
Posts: 162
And1: 131
Joined: Apr 22, 2022

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#24 » by Dooley » Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:13 pm

I have Steph, Dirk and Garnett over DRob out of those listed. Garnett not by much, they're really close, I think they're on about the same level as scorers and defenders and KG's passing and versatility maybe gives him a slight edge, but I would certainly listen to arguments the other way.

Steph and Dirk I rate really highly offensively, and for quite similar reasons, I think the package of volume scoring + spacing + playmaking or turnover economy is extremely valuable overall. And I would feel much more confident about their ability to be the best player on a championship team compared to DRob, which I think should matter when you're talking about guys in this range.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,622
And1: 3,138
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#25 » by Owly » Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:17 pm

70sFan wrote:
How is Curry's prime better? So far is been at best ten years and average defense. Robinson was a better scorer to me. Many now see shooting as the best scoring but players like Shaq, Olajuwon, Duncan and Robinson show that it isn't. Give Robinson Klay in the 90s and he's scoring even more.

Curry just has one of the most impressive finals series of his career against ATG Celtics defense and you still believe that Robinson is a better scorer? The same Robinson who never scored well against quality defense in postseason? That's wishful thinking, Robinson has no case over Curry as a scorer.

Not to contest the core 2 player scorer debate because ... well all the reasons.

"Never scored well against quality defense"? Could be parsed different ways ("a quality defense"?, on average?)

Still ...
If "a" not intended, iirc he torched the Suns and '96 and Hot Rod Williams (RIP) who was a quality defender (albeit slightly post prime at that point, production wise otoh) ... think I've got a couple of sources (definitely one) saying things like he did a great job, did all the right things, played "quality defense".

If "a" intended/implied I'd think '90 Blazers are one of the best team level D's he faced (better than on paper as Duckworth (RIP) goes out so a D specialist early career version of C Robinson (RIP, ... this is getting depressing) is in, I'd say this ups the team and man D, Wayne Cooper plays some, maybe some minutes from Bryant or Williams, I'm not working out minutes) and he has a perfectly good scoring series except at the line, which unless you're someone who believes in free throw defense ... that's not the defense.

Again not advocating for near Curry and I get the playoff drop (though as above and I think prior discussion re quality of D, I don't think holding FT% versus good defensive teams is fair) ... personally I think we're looking at small in prime samples and was put in some bad positions with roster construction ... but I can't argue scoring held up. I just think, whilst the sentence could be parsed in different ways, "never" seems a touch strong ... to me at least.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,896
And1: 25,242
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#26 » by 70sFan » Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:27 pm

Owly wrote:Not to contest the core 2 player scorer debate because ... well all the reasons.

"Never scored well against quality defense"? Could be parsed different ways ("a quality defense"?, on average?)

Still ...
If "a" not intended, iirc he torched the Suns and '96 and Hot Rod Williams (RIP) who was a quality defender (albeit slightly post prime at that point, production wise otoh) ... think I've got a couple of sources (definitely one) saying things like he did a great job, did all the right things, played "quality defense".

Suns were horrible defensively as a team though, ranking at +2.4 rDRtg in the RS.

If "a" intended/implied I'd think '90 Blazers are one of the best team level D's he faced (better than on paper as Duckworth (RIP) goes out so a D specialist early career version of C Robinson (RIP, ... this is getting depressing) is in, I'd say this ups the team and man D, Wayne Cooper plays some, maybe some minutes from Bryant or Williams, I'm not working out minutes) and he has a perfectly good scoring series except at the line, which unless you're someone who believes in free throw defense ... that's not the defense.

I wouldn't call 23 ppg on +2.7 rTS% a great scoring series. Even adjusting for relatively low FT% in the series, he'd still be at 23.6 ppg on +4.4 rTS% which is decent... but again nothing special. Not something we should admire as his best scoring series against good defensive team.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,622
And1: 3,138
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#27 » by Owly » Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:45 pm

70sFan wrote:
Owly wrote:Not to contest the core 2 player scorer debate because ... well all the reasons.

"Never scored well against quality defense"? Could be parsed different ways ("a quality defense"?, on average?)

Still ...
If "a" not intended, iirc he torched the Suns and '96 and Hot Rod Williams (RIP) who was a quality defender (albeit slightly post prime at that point, production wise otoh) ... think I've got a couple of sources (definitely one) saying things like he did a great job, did all the right things, played "quality defense".

Suns were horrible defensively as a team though, ranking at +2.4 rDRtg in the RS.

Indeed, hence my point trying to clarify different readings regarding whether you meant "quality defense" or "a quality defense". My reading indicate the former was played against him, I couldn't claim that at a team level, the Suns would tend to bring such.

70sFan wrote:
If "a" intended/implied I'd think '90 Blazers are one of the best team level D's he faced (better than on paper as Duckworth (RIP) goes out so a D specialist early career version of C Robinson (RIP, ... this is getting depressing) is in, I'd say this ups the team and man D, Wayne Cooper plays some, maybe some minutes from Bryant or Williams, I'm not working out minutes) and he has a perfectly good scoring series except at the line, which unless you're someone who believes in free throw defense ... that's not the defense.

I wouldn't call 23 ppg on +2.7 rTS% a great scoring series. Even adjusting for relatively low FT% in the series, he'd still be at 23.6 ppg on +4.4 rTS% which is decent... but again nothing special. Not something we should admire as his best scoring series against good defensive team.

Leading with the pre-adjustment numbers ... I assume you don't think FT defense is real ... that would be clearer just posting those or at least leading with them (raw numbers in parenthesis maybe). Would I argue it as "something special" ... not for a player of his caliber. Would I say it contradicts "never scored well" ... I think I would.

I would, otoh, (but based on your brackets and the "no Duckworth" improvement) I would guess it's the best on paper defense he faced (in reality in a series, matchup [e.g. Hakeem, Mutombo], defensive strategy may be more pertinent to individual production and individual difficulty). But I wasn't looking for that, I would guess it might be his best (you'll know the buckets better than me), but then especially in what are small samples I think you only need one to disprove/(or here debate) "never".
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,052
And1: 6,714
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#28 » by Jaivl » Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:55 pm

For most of the players the answer is either "he's not better" or "he's probably not better at their best, but he crushes via longevity".
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,286
And1: 22,291
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#29 » by Doctor MJ » Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:11 pm

G35 wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
migya wrote:There's been much talk recently here about to 10, top 20 or so rankings. Robinson has constantly been placed around 15-20. I don't understand how some players mentioned ahead of him had better careers so give your reasonings :

Players mentioned -

Garnett, Nowitzki, Curry, DrJ, Durant, Moses, CP, Nash.

Name other players of you want.


Let's see:

Garnett - more fluid agility, quicker anticipation, better communicator, better ball handler, better facilitator, better shooter, much better longevity.

Curry - hard to compare skill vs skill, but I'm very impressed with Curry's impact on winning, and at this point have him having more Top 5 years than Robinson had.

Nowitzki & Erving - I believe I had Robinson higher last time I did the analysis. If I didn't, probably because of longevity.

Durant, Moses, CP & Nash - definitely have Robinson higher



I see why we differ on KG.

I don't think KG is more fluid, or greater agility than Robinson at all. I don't know how to judge KG being a better ball handler, they never asked Robinson to be a ball handler, mostly because that would have been dumb.

Do you think Giannis is a better ball handler than KG because he can dribble end to end.

The problem with KG is that the things he was good at being are things that you don't really need from a big man. I would give up KG's ball handling if he was more efficient. I would give up KG's facilitating if he was a better rim protector.....


I'm glad if we can figure out differences in process!

On specific points:

Re: don't believe KG more fluid/agile. This makes me want to ask how you see Robinson's movement. I see him as a bit stilted compared to the most agile bigs. Do you disagree with this?

Re: would have been dumb to make Robinson a ball handler. It's only dumb if it's not good enough. I feel like you're thinking of this as "Robinson's a big, so you want him on the interior.", but the question is always how you get the ball to the man on the interior where he's in a position to attack. If a man can handle the ball on the perimeter - a la Giannis - that's going to make it considerably easier.

Re: Giannis better ball handler than KG. I think Giannis has focused on developing this more than KG or probably more than any earlier big with his height, so in that sense, the answer is "Yes".

Re: KG is good at things you don't need from a big. Ooh, we very much disagree here. To me that's talking like how people talked about KG 20 years ago when they really didn't know what to do with KG. I'd say KG excels at all sorts of stuff that aren't traditionally associated with bigs for understandable reasons, but if he can do those things, it's a missed opportunity not to allow him to do it...and KG's career - despite his top tier impact numbers - was full of missed strategic opportunities because he was ahead of his time.

Re: efficiency. Let's put it like this: In today's game, does anyone NOT want an agile 7-footer who can shoot from long distance very effectively while also being a DPOY level defender? Garnett's efficiency would have been considerably higher had his teams focused on a pace & space model...which all teams today basically have to do to stay competitive.

Re: if he were a better rim protector. I would argue that KG basically defined the state-of-the-art ideal for a defensive big in Boston, and that it's really not too different from Bill Russell's approach. The goal of these players is not the literal blocked shots, but the shot disruption that comes from successfully putting pressure on the opposing offense, and to max that out, you want someone who can threaten shots over as much horizontal ground as possible.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,943
And1: 11,448
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#30 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:12 pm

I can never shake the impression I have of David that the biggest difference between rs and ps DRob was that his medium range jumper went from very solid to pretty bad and he never got to where Hakeem did from 93 on where he was just going to take the shots when games got close or be able to understand that at a certain point you just demand the ball and tell everyone else to get out of the way. He might have got to that point had the injury not happened but again my sense was always that his jumper was never as good in the playoffs the way it could be like when he had his 71 game. Most of his points were jumpers in that game.
letskissbro
Rookie
Posts: 1,167
And1: 1,520
Joined: Sep 05, 2017

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#31 » by letskissbro » Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:14 pm

Of the guys listed only KG is definitively better to me. They're similar as scorers (in the playoffs) and defenders but KG brings better intangibles with his shooting, passing, and better self creation. Add on significantly better longevity and he's got the clear edge.

Curry has a comparable prime too and could pass him up with another 2 or 3 seasons like this last one.

Imo Robinson and Hakeem were virtual equals (outside of Hakeem's 93 season which I think is a clear rung above any DRob year), the biggest difference was that Hakeem had more quality seasons because of Robinson's Navy years. Magic and Bird had comparable career arcs but for some reason he gets relegated to outside the top 15 pretty often while they're rarely left out of the top 12.

I get the love KG receives from this board—I have him 6th myself—but I never understood why that energy is never kept for Robinson. Their arguments for being ranked higher than conventional wisdom typically places them are very similar.
Doctor MJ wrote:I like the analogy with Curry as Coca-Cola. And then I'd say Iverson was Lean.
migya
General Manager
Posts: 8,124
And1: 1,492
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#32 » by migya » Wed Jun 15, 2022 5:06 am

G35 wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
migya wrote:There's been much talk recently here about to 10, top 20 or so rankings. Robinson has constantly been placed around 15-20. I don't understand how some players mentioned ahead of him had better careers so give your reasonings :

Players mentioned -

Garnett, Nowitzki, Curry, DrJ, Durant, Moses, CP, Nash.

Name other players of you want.


Let's see:

Garnett - more fluid agility, quicker anticipation, better communicator, better ball handler, better facilitator, better shooter, much better longevity.

Curry - hard to compare skill vs skill, but I'm very impressed with Curry's impact on winning, and at this point have him having more Top 5 years than Robinson had.

Nowitzki & Erving - I believe I had Robinson higher last time I did the analysis. If I didn't, probably because of longevity.

Durant, Moses, CP & Nash - definitely have Robinson higher



I see why we differ on KG.

I don't think KG is more fluid, or greater agility than Robinson at all. I don't know how to judge KG being a better ball handler, they never asked Robinson to be a ball handler, mostly because that would have been dumb.

Do you think Giannis is a better ball handler than KG because he can dribble end to end.

The problem with KG is that the things he was good at being are things that you don't really need from a big man. I would give up KG's ball handling if he was more efficient. I would give up KG's facilitating if he was a better rim protector.....


I mostly agree, Garnett lacked enough in the big man skills, particularly shotblocking and inside scoring, to really be as great a centerpiece for a championship team. Robinson is one of the best defenders and big man scorers in history. 99 Robinson replacing 08 Garnett on those Celtics would be a 70 win season and they'd probably get three straight championships. Both spent most of their careers on bad teams but Robinson took his to much more winning.
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,522
And1: 8,070
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: Explain how these players are better than Robinson 

Post#33 » by G35 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:50 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
I'm glad if we can figure out differences in process!

On specific points:

Re: don't believe KG more fluid/agile. This makes me want to ask how you see Robinson's movement. I see him as a bit stilted compared to the most agile bigs. Do you disagree with this?

Re: would have been dumb to make Robinson a ball handler. It's only dumb if it's not good enough. I feel like you're thinking of this as "Robinson's a big, so you want him on the interior.", but the question is always how you get the ball to the man on the interior where he's in a position to attack. If a man can handle the ball on the perimeter - a la Giannis - that's going to make it considerably easier.

Re: Giannis better ball handler than KG. I think Giannis has focused on developing this more than KG or probably more than any earlier big with his height, so in that sense, the answer is "Yes".

Re: KG is good at things you don't need from a big. Ooh, we very much disagree here. To me that's talking like how people talked about KG 20 years ago when they really didn't know what to do with KG. I'd say KG excels at all sorts of stuff that aren't traditionally associated with bigs for understandable reasons, but if he can do those things, it's a missed opportunity not to allow him to do it...and KG's career - despite his top tier impact numbers - was full of missed strategic opportunities because he was ahead of his time.

Re: efficiency. Let's put it like this: In today's game, does anyone NOT want an agile 7-footer who can shoot from long distance very effectively while also being a DPOY level defender? Garnett's efficiency would have been considerably higher had his teams focused on a pace & space model...which all teams today basically have to do to stay competitive.

Re: if he were a better rim protector. I would argue that KG basically defined the state-of-the-art ideal for a defensive big in Boston, and that it's really not too different from Bill Russell's approach. The goal of these players is not the literal blocked shots, but the shot disruption that comes from successfully putting pressure on the opposing offense, and to max that out, you want someone who can threaten shots over as much horizontal ground as possible.


When I see Robinson vs KG and agility:

Robinson had the best combination of speed, agility, quickness, and strength that I have personally seen. He was like guard in a big man's body. So when I see DRob, he can take anyone off the dribble in a one on one situation and I'm talking the best big man defenders...so yes DRob could take Hakeem off the dribble.

When I think of KG in a one on one situation, he's a little more deliberate and his steps are more lanky. KG's twitchiness is not as good as Robinson's.

Here is a video of what I mean:



@:13 DRob got the ball and it was a quick spin move, no hesitation quick steps

@:30 Robinson gets the pass and he's already leaning into his spin move, which I don't see much from KG, he's more deliberate in the post, then the other thing is DRob was able to use his footwork and still finish with power, KG was all finesse

@ 1:40 DRob is able to go right around Olajuwon with a quick upfake

@ 2:01 this is one of the best examples of DRob's quick feet and speed that I don't think KG could do. DRob get's the pass and he gets Hakeem completely leaning the wrong way and goes right by him for a power dunk. This is a one on one situation with Hakeem...a player many people think is the perfect center.

@ 2:11 this shows DRob's twitch reactions on defense guarding Hakeem who does a dream shake to the middle and it looks like he has a step on DRob, but DRob is not only able to recover but cleanly block the little hook shot. KG is not doing that.

Then from 2:16 to 3:25 you see DRob dominating a frontline of Shaq and Horace Grant. That is an intimidating front line but he blocks Shaq's shot twice and these aren't hook shots, these were shots with Shaq going to the basket. @2:27 Drob blocks a Shaq dunk attempt AFTER he stopped ball penetration. I don't think is capable of blocking any dunks by Shaq. KG just does not provide that sort of rim protection.

Here is something else I think is underrated about DRob, is that he had a very effective mid-range game. His jumper set up his driving because everyone would play off him because he was so quick.

@ 4:07 he gets the ball at the top of the key and he fakes a drive to his right and completely backs off Otis Thorpe who was a good defender, and creates about five ft of space to get an open 18ft shot. KG is not doing that, because he does not have the agility to blow by defenders. His fakes aren't faking people enough to open up driving lanes.

@ 4:31 DRob is on the right block with Hakeem on his back and he is so quick he leaves Hakeem flat footed and spins to his left for an uncontested layup

@ 5:08 he does it again to Hakeem going around him for a reverse layup...imo, I don't think KG has that kind of agility, footwork and touch around the basket. He may have done it once or twice but DRob did it consistently and the stats bear that out. Robinson is one of the most efficient players ever.

DRob shot over 50% in 13 of his 15 seasons. His TS% obliterates KG's...DRob's career TS% is .583 and only two seasons did KG even match that.

For example, when we talk about efficiency, many people will say that Michael Jordan was far more efficient that Kobe and its true he was, but the gap between Mike and Kobe is smaller than the gap between DRob and Garnett.

The rest of the video is just more of the same of DRob going around defenders and dunking or getting layups.

So to be fair I looked at a KG's MVP 2004 season and its what I suspected, KG is a mid-range jump shooting fadeaway type big man. Similar to Patrick Ewing where I also criticized him is that 80% of his shots are fadeaways. Kevin uses his length effectively to get shots off. He isn't blowing by people, he isn't crossing people over with his handles, and he takes long strides. Watch how long his strides are in the post compared to DRob. You can't get around people with long strides, you have to be quicker.



Then for the defense, you see a lot of KG blocking shots from guards or weakside...DRob was blocking shots faced up. You saw DRob blocking Hakeem and Shaq head on. That is not what KG is doing. One of the issues I always had with KG is that he never wanted any piece of Shaq.

@ 7:25 to 9:00 they show (I guess) all the highlights from the Lakers-Wolves playoff series and I don't see any blocks of Shaq or really anyone during that series. So I checked BR of how blocks KG had in that series and he had seven...in a six game series, your best defender, this GOAT level defender, this amazingly athletic defender got seven blocks? Really? Where is that legendary defense? Where are the reactions...the quickness...the lateral movement.

In that 1995 series between the Rockets and Spurs where Hakeem went all GOAT, DRob still had 13 blocks and 9 steals in a six game series. But KG at his absolute peak (this is one of those top 10 peaks all time we hear about) and he was very underwhelming when the Wolves needed him to step up. This isn't even Shaq at his best or most dominating. This is Shaq starting to get out of shape. Where was KG?

One thing I don't understand is that if you watch KG...he plays a lot like a 7ft Kobe. So when you hear all the complaints about Kobe taking bad shots...inefficient shots...but then you see KG is taking the same kind of shots but lower efficiency, lower volume and he's a big man. I don't see KG having this athletic advantage where he was doing what he was doing on the court.

Someone should have told KG to stick to the post or mid-range and you would be more effective, but they essentially let KG do whatever he wanted and it was not efficient.

I don't feel sorry for KG, he didn't take advantage of his opportunities and some of that was due to his personality imo.

But if you gave DRob that version of Sam Cassell, Sprewell, Wally and I think he beats the Rockets. Drob had crazy Rodman, Vinny Del Negro, Sean Elliott, and Avery Johnson. Imo, that's no contest.....
I'm so tired of the typical......

Return to Player Comparisons


cron