Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,514
- And1: 8,804
- Joined: Jul 03, 2009
-
Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Take out the factor of who you think is BPA. Who do you think fits our team the best and why?
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- PrimeThyme
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,570
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Doak Campbell
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Jabari. Pretty seamless fit next to WCJ/Franz and addresses a 10 plus year need we’ve had of shooting in the frontcourt.
But why would a team in our position ignore BPA for fit? We’ve got to take the best player on the board.
But why would a team in our position ignore BPA for fit? We’ve got to take the best player on the board.

Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,068
- And1: 3,405
- Joined: Jul 01, 2015
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
It all doesnt matter if we dont have star ball handler. There is only one potential ball handler in top 3 and his name is Paolo Banchero.
My money is on Banchero going number 1 !
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,373
- And1: 14,352
- Joined: May 05, 2014
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Jabari's ready to step in and shoot the crap out of the ball and play great defense for 30 mpg.
No more learning to shoot or trying to gain weight for 3 years.
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
No more learning to shoot or trying to gain weight for 3 years.
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 285
- And1: 164
- Joined: Nov 08, 2020
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
I think Banchero or Ivey is the best option for Orlando, just looking at the roster and seeing how the game is played, you need superstars who can make things happen in chaotic situations and against tough defenses. those guys are the hardest to find.
Chet and Jabari are great players but they don't project as an alpha scorer/playmaker which is pretty important in the playoffs. they are more of the I can make plays when my stars are struggling and contribute in other areas.
Paolo and Ivey both have potential to be that dynamic lead player on a championship team.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using RealGM mobile app
Chet and Jabari are great players but they don't project as an alpha scorer/playmaker which is pretty important in the playoffs. they are more of the I can make plays when my stars are struggling and contribute in other areas.
Paolo and Ivey both have potential to be that dynamic lead player on a championship team.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- Audi
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,889
- And1: 3,216
- Joined: May 30, 2014
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
All of them fit, imo. Jabari is the only one that really fits and fills a need. I’m not sure the alpha first option ball handler & scorer we need is even in this draft, which is why we are all debating over 3-4 guys and I would be happy with any of them.
Abra Cadabra, Razzmatazz, Slam-Dunk Sesame, Hocus Pocus, Alacazam, Gonna set the spirit free
Keeping The Original Orlando Magic Theme Song Alive since 2009
Keeping The Original Orlando Magic Theme Song Alive since 2009
Spoiler:
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,365
- And1: 1,348
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
If there we equal players available at each position, I'd take the 2 guard, our biggest hole.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,514
- And1: 8,804
- Joined: Jul 03, 2009
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
PrimeThyme wrote:Jabari. Pretty seamless fit next to WCJ/Franz and addresses a 10 plus year need we’ve had of shooting in the frontcourt.
But why would a team in our position ignore BPA for fit? We’ve got to take the best player on the board.
Is there a BPA? Seems like splitting hairs. Fit is a natural consideration.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,759
- And1: 1,199
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Our offense is so bad that the answer is Paolo Banchero.
I’ve gone from moving him up and down from 2-5 a lot, but he’s settled down as my number two when I think of him at 250 lbs and 6’10 doing what he can do. I’m normally not a big fan of putting any weight in changing my big board after the college season, but when I didn’t really watch enough games, then here we are.
Jabari Smith number one, as he’ll be somewhat close second place for fit but then a big number one as BPA for me, personally.
I’ve gone from moving him up and down from 2-5 a lot, but he’s settled down as my number two when I think of him at 250 lbs and 6’10 doing what he can do. I’m normally not a big fan of putting any weight in changing my big board after the college season, but when I didn’t really watch enough games, then here we are.
Jabari Smith number one, as he’ll be somewhat close second place for fit but then a big number one as BPA for me, personally.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- Def Swami
- Forum Mod - Magic
- Posts: 25,970
- And1: 15,369
- Joined: Aug 04, 2008
- Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
- Contact:
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Jabari Smith. With all these guards and wings that can't shoot, having a big that can space the floor for them to drive without relinquishing anything on defense is probably the best fit for a flawed roster.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,812
- And1: 1,873
- Joined: Jul 06, 2012
- Location: Baltimore MD
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Jabari is def the best fit. You can plug him right in. Banchero and Ivey are the worst fits but Id still pick them.
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- magicfan217
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,212
- And1: 1,055
- Joined: Nov 04, 2004
- Location: Still a JJ Redick fanboy
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
I think it's pretty easily Jabari. People saying SG is our biggest "Hole" are giving up on the #5 pick from last year way too soon. We can't replace Suggs that quickly. He needs to be given time to develop. A forward that can fill in between Franz and Wendell is easily the biggest hole. We cannot count on JI at this point. And then when you consider Jabari's skill set it meshes perfectly with our current roster.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,968
- And1: 6,114
- Joined: Jun 29, 2009
- Location: Tampa
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Honestly, Chet is the best fit if you look at how we played last season. He slots into Bamba's role seamlessly and upgrades that position tenfold.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- fendilim
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,832
- And1: 5,470
- Joined: Jun 11, 2002
- Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Fit like team need?
This team needs a superstar, none of its current players matters. We dont have that guy yet.
I think out of Jabari and Chet, Chet has the most potential to be THE guy.
So yeah, I’m team Chet, I’d still be happy if we ended up with Jabari though.
We just need a franchise altering guy. We need to swing for the fences now, 10 years of mediocrity is enough. Chet seems To be the generational talent in this draft.
This team needs a superstar, none of its current players matters. We dont have that guy yet.
I think out of Jabari and Chet, Chet has the most potential to be THE guy.
So yeah, I’m team Chet, I’d still be happy if we ended up with Jabari though.
We just need a franchise altering guy. We need to swing for the fences now, 10 years of mediocrity is enough. Chet seems To be the generational talent in this draft.

Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,282
- And1: 13,734
- Joined: Apr 10, 2001
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Keegan Murray is probably the best ‘fit’. He has outside range comparable to Jabari, but can score inside almost as efficiently as Chet, and create his own shots. Plus he’s a 2-way player who can guard the perimeter.
Put him alongside Franz and WCJ and you’ve got a front court who are versatile and can play on and off the ball whilst still creating space for our perimeter-struggling guards.
The bonus is Keegan is slated to be a later pick, so trading down for him would also bring additional assets.
Put him alongside Franz and WCJ and you’ve got a front court who are versatile and can play on and off the ball whilst still creating space for our perimeter-struggling guards.
The bonus is Keegan is slated to be a later pick, so trading down for him would also bring additional assets.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,843
- And1: 536
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
- Location: Southern California
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Jabari and Paolo both fit Best in my opinion but in different ways. Jabari will stretch the floor and be an instant impact shooter, Paolo will bruise with Wendell and soft teams will not like dealing with them at all. I prefer Paolo but Jabari is #2 for me now.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,513
- And1: 763
- Joined: Feb 25, 2021
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Rule numero uno....Never ignore BPA. Always go with BPA.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- AdamTheGreek
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,422
- And1: 2,555
- Joined: Dec 30, 2006
- Location: Orlando, FL. Thinking of Greece.
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Poll is correct.
Jabari is the best fit. He’s the best worker in the draft, currently has the most NBA-ready body, fills our shooting need badly. Fits very well with Wendell, Franz, and Fultz.
He’s the best who can play switchable defense.
He can shoot and turnaround jumper defenders like Dirk/Rashard. That is an elite post-up skill even if he’s not backing defenders up like a traditional big. There’s mismatch exploitation opportunities. I’m not worried about the lack of scoring in the paint at Auburn, that’s not what they wanted him to do. Plus, we have Wendell for that:
Chet is a great help blocker, but so is Bamba. No one confuses Mo to be a good overall defender. Chet has a better BBIQ but he also struggles with true athletes. I don’t need Jabari to block a million shots if he stays in front of perimeter players with his crouching Gianni-like defensive stance and prevents dudes from driving into the paint entirely.
Jabari or Paolo is the best player available. Paolo you can argue does some things similar to either Franz or Wendell (not a bad thing, but that hurts his ‘fit’ case) more so than Jabari. But Paolo is viewed as a definite alpha scorer (more so than Jabari at the moment who I think will be as well because dribbling isn’t that tough to teach) which is the other big fit need we have.
Paolo looks lighter than 250 now. He’s more mobile than given credit for and Julius Randle comparisons are completely wrong. He’s somewhere on the Jabari Parker-Jayson Tatum scale. And Parker would’ve been great too if not for the injuries.
Jabari is the best fit. He’s the best worker in the draft, currently has the most NBA-ready body, fills our shooting need badly. Fits very well with Wendell, Franz, and Fultz.
He’s the best who can play switchable defense.
He can shoot and turnaround jumper defenders like Dirk/Rashard. That is an elite post-up skill even if he’s not backing defenders up like a traditional big. There’s mismatch exploitation opportunities. I’m not worried about the lack of scoring in the paint at Auburn, that’s not what they wanted him to do. Plus, we have Wendell for that:
Chet is a great help blocker, but so is Bamba. No one confuses Mo to be a good overall defender. Chet has a better BBIQ but he also struggles with true athletes. I don’t need Jabari to block a million shots if he stays in front of perimeter players with his crouching Gianni-like defensive stance and prevents dudes from driving into the paint entirely.
Jabari or Paolo is the best player available. Paolo you can argue does some things similar to either Franz or Wendell (not a bad thing, but that hurts his ‘fit’ case) more so than Jabari. But Paolo is viewed as a definite alpha scorer (more so than Jabari at the moment who I think will be as well because dribbling isn’t that tough to teach) which is the other big fit need we have.
Paolo looks lighter than 250 now. He’s more mobile than given credit for and Julius Randle comparisons are completely wrong. He’s somewhere on the Jabari Parker-Jayson Tatum scale. And Parker would’ve been great too if not for the injuries.
Bluesky: @adampapageorgiou.bsky.social
Penny & Pops Podcast (Orlando Magic): https://soundcloud.com/137665379
Penny & Pops Podcast (Orlando Magic): https://soundcloud.com/137665379
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,918
- And1: 14,847
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
Bensational wrote:Keegan Murray is probably the best ‘fit’. He has outside range comparable to Jabari, but can score inside almost as efficiently as Chet, and create his own shots. Plus he’s a 2-way player who can guard the perimeter.
Put him alongside Franz and WCJ and you’ve got a front court who are versatile and can play on and off the ball whilst still creating space for our perimeter-struggling guards.
The bonus is Keegan is slated to be a later pick, so trading down for him would also bring additional assets.
only question to me about Keegan is his true height. is he 6'8? thats more SF height. we also dont know his length, he didnt do any measurements at the combine.
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,918
- And1: 14,847
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Ignore BPA. Who fits best? Why?
AdamTheGreek wrote:Poll is correct.
Jabari is the best fit. He’s the best worker in the draft, currently has the most NBA-ready body, fills our shooting need badly. Fits very well with Wendell, Franz, and Fultz.
He’s the best who can play switchable defense.
He can shoot and turnaround jumper defenders like Dirk/Rashard. That is an elite post-up skill even if he’s not backing defenders up like a traditional big. There’s mismatch exploitation opportunities. I’m not worried about the lack of scoring in the paint at Auburn, that’s not what they wanted him to do. Plus, we have Wendell for that:
Chet is a great help blocker, but so is Bamba. No one confuses Mo to be a good overall defender. Chet has a better BBIQ but he also struggles with true athletes. I don’t need Jabari to block a million shots if he stays in front of perimeter players with his crouching Gianni-like defensive stance and prevents dudes from driving into the paint entirely.
Jabari or Paolo is the best player available. Paolo you can argue does some things similar to either Franz or Wendell (not a bad thing, but that hurts his ‘fit’ case) more so than Jabari. But Paolo is viewed as a definite alpha scorer (more so than Jabari at the moment who I think will be as well because dribbling isn’t that tough to teach) which is the other big fit need we have.
Paolo looks lighter than 250 now. He’s more mobile than given credit for and Julius Randle comparisons are completely wrong. He’s somewhere on the Jabari Parker-Jayson Tatum scale. And Parker would’ve been great too if not for the injuries.
how is that quantified? because by every report, Chet is a workout warrior too. Im sure many other players putting in the work too. and Chet more than a "help blocker", he goes chest to chest against big men. Watch him vs Duren in the tournament.