Almost Retired wrote:The idea that Liddell is not athletic enough is foolish. Look at the video. He switched on guards in space a lot in college. He didn't get abused. And if he can stand torso to torso with Kofi Cokburn and hold his own....The combine numbers don't lie. Even though he is a very strong 240-245 pounds he can get off the ground very well.
I don’t think he’s tall enough to be an impact 4 in the NBA, and I don’t think he’s quick enough to play the 3. College and NBA are two completely different levels of athleticism. His ability to switch and stay in front of wings in college isn’t completely meaningless but the highlights only mean so much. I saw him look like he was standing in concrete plenty of times in college as well. Like you, most of the college ball I watch is Big 10. I’ve always had concerns with Liddell translating to the NBA game defensively.
Liddell works hard and is smart. He won’t suck as a defender but he’s also going to be exploitable at both the 3 and 4. Offensively he’ll be fine as a role player which, for a good defender, would be plenty.
Regarding his athleticism, I beat this drum with Pat too. Athleticism is based on a wide variety of factors. Liddell can leap, but he has a poor second leap and his lateral quickness is sluggish. There is a difference between measurable athleticism and functional athleticism. And in actual game action, Liddell’s functional athleticism has always been a big question mark for translating to the NBA.
If Liddell were in fact as functionally athletic as he is measurable athletic, he’d be a lock as a top 10 pick. It’s not foolish that this is a concern.
That said, I do believe Liddell will be a useful NBA player. I also believe that certain teams in certain situations would be wise to use an 18th pick on him. But in my view the Bulls need to target someone with a standout ability as a specialist or a much higher upside player to take the bigger risk.
I don’t want Liddell for the Bulls, but it’s not like I think he’ll be a bad NBA player.