Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 (Houston)

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 (Houston) 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:57 pm

How it works
Simple ballot system: 3 votes/ballots [3-2-1 point system]. The "source" with the most points will take the spot.

It looks like interest in this project is limited, so I'm not going to have a designated time-limit for each place [though I don't want to leave each open for 4-5 days]; we'll probably aim for something in the neighborhood of 48 hours each, but we'll see.
This may be one of those projects that fizzles out quick due to lack of interest, but I'm hoping at least 2-3 people will come along with me for it.
There will be no approval of participants; anyone can pop in at any time to vote/contribute, even on a sporadic or part-time basis. No "arguments" will be required to accompany votes, though a list of notable players from each source being voted for is encouraged.....this will help jog memories, as well as stimulate conversation (and may help clarify the "source" in some rare cases where it is ambiguous). Hopefully we'll pick up some participants along the way.

How you want to consider those universities/sources (in terms of considerations of total players vs quality of players, etc) is entirely up to you [though others may wish to debate your selection criteria].

I'm hoping to make it out to around the top 20 [or so] "sources" of all-time for pro [NBA/ABA/BAA/NBL] players, but we'll see.


The "Talent Sources"
We are going to include non-university sources, as to do otherwise just leaves too many relevant players on the table.
Besides, it occurred to me that when scrutinizing the resulting list, one can just mentally exclude the non-university sources [I'll even colour-code those differently to make it easier], and what's left is an ordered list of the universities (as well as an ordered list of other sources)......two birds, right?
The source can be of the following three types:

a) (an American) University/College - if they played even one year at the university, that will be designated the default "source" of that pro player. If a player played at multiple universities, you can mentally factor that in to consideration for ALL universities played at, give preference to the university he had his BEST years at, or to the university he played LONGER at.....whatever; up to you.

b) a Non-USA Country (if not subject to "a" above) - This one is only to be considered a potential source IF they did not attend an American university. Examples would be guys like Dirk Nowitzki, Luka Doncic, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, or Nikola Jokic.......their country of origin is considered the "source".
Someone like Hakeem Olajuwon, otoh, would be considered from the University of Houston [and not Nigeria].

In the event of using this designation, we may have individuals where consensus on just WHERE a player is "from" is debatable. Tony Parker is a good example: born in Belgium to an American father and Dutch mother, but raised in France (confusing already, right?). But most of us consider Tony from France [he played for their national team, too], as that's where he grew up.

And to me, that's what it's more about: where they grew up (rather than where they were born (or the nationality of his parents)). There may end up being a player for whom the "source" country is ambiguous and debatable; but we'll cross that bridge as we come to it (and again: that's why it's good to give at least a partial list of WHO you have in mind when placing a vote, so we can debate things like this as needed).

c) an American Highschool Zone - Self-explanatory: this is for American players who did NOT have a college career, but rather went straight to pro.
Having just "USA" as a single source for all American players who did NOT attend a university is just too great a source......it ends up blowing away all the competition at this point (we've just seen too many great players out of highschool now, it holds too much of a sample-size advantage over any American university).
So I've opted to break it up into three zones, which are as follows....

The East Coast Zone - This includes all states that actually make up part of America's eastern coastline [including Washington D.C. simply because it basically resides within Maryland]. That is: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticutt. Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland [including D.C.], Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.

The East-Central Zone - This includes the states west of our "East Coast Zone", but east of [or inclusive of, in one case] the Missouri River. That is: West Virginia, Vermont, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Mississippi, Lousiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Missouri.

The Western Zone - All the states that are left: Texas, Arkansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, Hawaii.


That's 14 states in the East Coast Zone, 16 in the East-Central Zone, and 20 in the Western Zone.
If you want to know why I broke them up in this manner, I wanted zones that had some geographical rhyme or reason, but also zones that had similar overall population.....
The East Coast Zone has a population of just over 108 million by recent census.
The East-Central Zone has just under 102 million.
The Western Zone has just over 119 million.

So the Western Zone has the largest population, BUT that's only by recent census. If we jumped back 60-70 years ago, that was not at all the case. Nearer the start of BAA/NBA history, the Western Zone would have been the LEAST populous zone. The population of states like California, Arizona, Nevada, and even Texas have really taken off in more modern eras.
Basketball also started out East, and spread west more gradually. So I intentionally made it the largest zone [today] to compensate somewhat for that consideration, while still having some manner of geographical demarkation to go with.

Gimme' your top 3 picks [in order] for the #11 spot.....

1. UCLA
2. North Carolina
3. Kentucky
4. Kansas
5. East Coast Zone (highschool)
6. Duke
7. Georgetown
8. East-Central Zone (highschool)
9. Michigan State
10. Wake Forest

Spoiler:
Doctor MJ wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

jalengreen wrote:.

falcolombardi wrote:.

Colbini wrote:.

giordunk wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#2 » by trex_8063 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:58 pm

EDITED (~3:20pm MST 6/22/22 to include Marquette).

Total WS
Arizona - 974.3
Ohio State - 965.4
Indiana - 949.7
Michigan - 897.7
UCONN - 828.9
Georgia Tech - 797.7
Notre Dame - 769.0
Texas - 746.6
Houston - 708.5
Illinois - 695.9
Marquette - 671.9
LSU - 670.1
Spain - 339.9
Western Zone - 317.8
Serbia - 275.9

Total Players (Mean WS)
Indiana - 68 (14.0)
Arizona - 62 (15.7)
Michigan - 62 (14.5)
Notre Dame - 60 (12.8)
Ohio State - 50 (19.3)
LSU - 50 (13.4)
Illinois - 46 (15.1)
Marquette - 43 (15.6)
Georgia Tech - 41 (19.5)
UCONN - 39 (21.3)
Texas - 37 (20.2)
Houston - 38 (18.6)
Serbia - 24 (11.5)
Spain - 15 (22.66)
Western Zone - 9 identified so far (35.31)

Score [the one I'd previously shared]
Arizona - 414.89
Ohio State - 391.34
Indiana - 372.88
Houston - 367.66
Michigan - 360.12
UCONN - 359.22
LSU - 336.28
Notre Dame - 333.52
Georgia Tech - 326.66
Illinois - 324.78
Texas - 318.60
Marquette - 311.79
Spain - 191.25
Western Zone - 155.11
Serbia - 154.86

All-Star Selections
Houston - 38
LSU - 36
Ohio State - 33
Indiana - 31
Marquette - 30
Texas - 27
Illinois - 24 (6 were ABA All-Stars [also a few from early 1950's; but otoh Illinois also claims Derek Harper, Eddie Johnson, Nick Anderson, and Kendall Gill.......who were all dubiously snubbed their entire careers)
UCONN - 22
Michigan - 18
Georgia Tech - 18
Notre Dame - 15
Spain - 8
Arizona - 6 (although note they have Mike Bibby, Richard Jefferson, Jason Terry, and DeAndre Ayton......all of whom have had at least 1 or 2 All-Star level seasons, even if they weren't recognized; Iggy only got one, too)
Serbia - 5
Western Zone - 3

MVP's
LSU - 3
Serbia - 2
Houston - 1
Texas - 1
Indiana - 1 (or 0.5?--->George McGinnis shared a co-MVP with Dr. J [in the ABA])

Ohio State/Michigan/Arizona/UCONN/Georgia Tech/Notre Dame/Spain/Western Zone/Illinois/Marquette - 0 each
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
jalengreen
Starter
Posts: 2,176
And1: 1,926
Joined: Aug 09, 2021
   

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#3 » by jalengreen » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:19 pm

Last time I went 1. Houston, 2. Wake, 3. Ohio State. Tentatively sticking with that order for now and having LSU move into the rankings with Wake having been selected:

1. Houston
2. Ohio State
3. LSU
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#4 » by falcolombardi » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:27 pm

Sorry for dissapearing from the last thread guys got a bit too busy the last few days and forgot about real gm, Will try to vote in the rest of threads left

I was actually considering houston over wake forest fwiw as i think hayes bridges the gap betweeb paul and drexler and then some but whatever

Leaning right now into houston over lousiana as i find hayes career superior to simmons short career and i still have seripus doubts about maravich having real all star impact hakeem/drexler vs shaq/petit is equal ish

For 3 i am thinking to start seriously lookinh into countries like serbia, spain, france and maybe even germany (?) as well as michigan , ohio and both arizonas
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#5 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:57 am

Anyone else thinking about Arizona? (I guess falcolombardi did at least give them a mention)

Their depth of talent is pretty impressive. No MVP-tier players, but a relative TON of "good" NBA careers.

One of the things I've been listing is All-Star selections from each source, but there's a ton of noise to that. For example, Houston has 38, and Arizona has just 6.
But consider the following:

Otis Birdsong (Houston): 4 All-Stars

Andre Iguodala, Mike Bibby, Jason Terry, Richard Jefferson, and DeAndre Ayton combined (Arizona): 1 All-Star

Does that seem equitable?
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#6 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:12 am

trex_8063 wrote:Anyone else thinking about Arizona? (I guess falcolombardi did at least give them a mention)

Their depth of talent is pretty impressive. No MVP-tier players, but a relative TON of "good" NBA careers.

One of the things I've been listing is All-Star selections from each source, but there's a ton of noise to that. For example, Houston has 38, and Arizona has just 6.
But consider the following:

Otis Birdsong (Houston): 4 All-Stars

Andre Iguodala, Mike Bibby, Jason Terry, Richard Jefferson, and DeAndre Ayton combined (Arizona): 1 All-Star

Does that seem equitable?


I dont use the actual accolades as all star selections and mvps except as tiebreakers same with win shares

I prefer evaluating the players individually, ben simmons is a multi all star but iguodala career is a lot better
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#7 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:25 am

Houston

total of nba players: 34 ( mid)

mvp level players: 2 (mid) (hakeem, maybe drexler)

notable all star level players: 3 (mid) (hakeem, drexler, hayes)

notable: birdsong, bo outlaw

Vs

lousiana

total of nba players: 47 ( mid)

mvp level players: 2 (high) (shaq, petit)

notable all star level players: 4 ( high) (shaq, petit, ben simmons*, maravich) *short career

notable: glen davis, abdul-rauf

I am low on simmons career and have huge doubts about maravich impact (anyone here want to sell me on pistol pete) as his results are outlier bad for a player of his rep and seemingly not in a way that can be explained by bad teammates

So i go houston first, LSU second and thinl more aboyt my thirs pick

After those two i think the stacked at the top schools end and we are left with 1 superstar + good players sources vs no superstars but a few all stars vs no stars but tons of good players

I think germany with dirk + detlef would be interesting if they had spain level depth or spain if luka career was finished but neither is the case

France has low key a very deep talent pool headliend by two stars (parker and gobert) and a decent amount of notable talent line diaw or batum

Serbia is similar but with an actual superstar in jokic

I think france, spain and serbia should start making some noise here

Michigan, ohio and arizona seem to be the next schools to look at

But marquette top heavy big 2 may just put them over the top here as they arguably are the last source with 2 superstars in butler and wade
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#8 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:33 am

arizona

total of nba players: 62 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 2 ( low) (Iguodala, arenas)

notable: kerr (coaching bonus?) budinger, ayton (still not quite an star career yet) richard jefferson, sean elliot, bibby

vs

michigan

total of nba players: 59 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 3 ( mid) (glen rice, webber, tomjamovich)

notable: jalen rose, juwan howard, jamal crawford

Vs

Marquette

total of nba players: 44 ( mid)

mvp level players: 2 (high) wade and butler

notable all star level players: 4? ( mid) (wade, butler maurice lucas, doc rivers)

notable: jae crowder

I wont consider serbia or france yet as marquette top 2 clearly beats gobert/parker and jokic/divac (jokic career may come to eclipse wade in the future thanks to longevity but that is not to discuss here yet)

Marquette wins this at the top while arizona wins it with depth, so i am gonna go marquettw for now
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#9 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:34 am

1-houston (would have voted them over wake forest but alas, wake forest would be here anyway if i voted houston 10 very clpse between both)

2- LSU

3-Marquette

HM: indiana, spain, arizona, france, michigan

Open to be convinced on moving marquette down and arizona up but i dont think i can be dissuaded on lousiana state U for the next round
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#10 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:45 am

What are you guys thoughts on

Marquette- i am being too high on their top 4 despite them being underwhelming after that

Arizona- how to evaluate their depth of talebt but lack of star careers,iggy and arenas short career coming the closest (i dont weight ayton two borderline all star seasons too high yet he still has a lpt of room tl grow and his high end playrt longevity is not even as good as ben simmons who i am not even that high on as a career

Lousiana- am i being too harsh on maravich?

Spain-is gasol, gasol, luka (2 stars with long careers and a superstar with a very short career) + players like rubio and ibaka do they matchup favorably with marquette already? Should i give them bonus point for how good luka likely will be in the future (do wr consider expectatives for the future here?)

Frances vs arizona, france arguabky has the top 2 career and they have a decent depth of talent too wuth diaw and batum should they get more consideration among the no-mvp level player schools/spurces?

I see serbia a tad below spain/france still, jokic career is too short to tske over gobert or the gasols yet and divac is great but not better than the gasols or parker/gobert

Spain/france depth of succesful talebt like rubio amd ibaka beats serbia guys for me

Should harden/dort arizona stsrt to enter our radar?

How high are we on michigan top 3 of webber/tomjanovich and rice?

What do we do of the top heavy sources left like san francisco, germany (who also have detlef schremp who may bridge the gap between dirk and russel) davidson
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#11 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:01 am

There are so maby viable schools and countries at this stage that it is hard to keep track of

Didnt even get into ohio, indiana texas or florida
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#12 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:14 am

Indiana (had not even got into them)

total of nba players: 65 ( High)

mvp level players: 1-2? (High) (bird, isiah thomas)

notable all star level players: 5 (high) bird, thomas, tom van arsdale?(3 all star picks is very notable) walt bellamy, george mcginnis

Notable: oladipo, eric gordon

notable: jalen rose, juwan howard, jamal crawford

Now that is flying under (my) radar. i am changing my 3rd pick for indiana over marquette

Bird career edges out wade a bit and isiah probably edges out butler even if i think jimmy may have the best peak

Lucas and rivers vs bellamy, mcginnis is close and then i see the names of indiana edging out marquette

May even comsider them over lousiana next round
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#13 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:21 pm

falcolombardi wrote:arizona

total of nba players: 62 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 2 ( low) (Iguodala, arenas)

notable: kerr (coaching bonus?) budinger, ayton (still not quite an star career yet) richard jefferson, sean elliot, bibby

vs

michigan

total of nba players: 59 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 3 ( mid) (glen rice, webber, tomjamovich)

notable: jalen rose, juwan howard, jamal crawford

Vs

Marquette

total of nba players: 44 ( mid)

mvp level players: 2 (high) wade and butler

notable all star level players: 4? ( mid) (wade, butler maurice lucas, doc rivers)

notable: jae crowder

I wont consider serbia or france yet as marquette top 2 clearly beats gobert/parker and jokic/divac (jokic career may come to eclipse wade in the future thanks to longevity but that is not to discuss here yet)

Marquette wins this at the top while arizona wins it with depth, so i am gonna go marquettw for now



This sort of speaks to what I was saying above. While you stated you weren't really looking at number of All-Stars as anything other than perhaps a tie-breaker, in your own accounting above you appear to be using whether or not they ever actually received an All-Star selection as the minimum threshold to designate them "All-Star level".

Inasmuch as Doc Rivers, Maurice Lucas, Rudy Tomjanovich, and even Pete Maravich were ever legitimately "All-Star level", so were probably all of Mike Bibby, DeAndre Ayton, Jason Terry, and Richard Jefferson [for at least a season or two each].
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#14 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:24 pm

falcolombardi wrote:Indiana (had not even got into them)

total of nba players: 65 ( High)

mvp level players: 1-2? (High) (bird, isiah thomas)

notable all star level players: 5 (high) bird, thomas, tom van arsdale?(3 all star picks is very notable) walt bellamy, george mcginnis

d


Hold up here, you're blending two different universites. Isiah, and most others you mentioned went to Indiana. Larry Bird attended Indiana State.......entirely different university.

Also, no way was Isiah MVP level, imo (or if he was, similar semantics/criteria that designates him as such would also make someone like Gilbert Arenas an "MVP level player" for a season or two).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#15 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:45 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:Indiana (had not even got into them)

total of nba players: 65 ( High)

mvp level players: 1-2? (High) (bird, isiah thomas)

notable all star level players: 5 (high) bird, thomas, tom van arsdale?(3 all star picks is very notable) walt bellamy, george mcginnis

d


Hold up here, you're blending two different universites. Isiah, and most others you mentioned went to Indiana. Larry Bird attended Indiana State.......entirely different university.

Also, no way was Isiah MVP level, imo (or if he was, similar semantics/criteria that designates him as such would also make someone like Gilbert Arenas an "MVP level player" for a season or two).


Weird i looked up indiana nba players and found alist with both bird and thomas

I move my third pick back to marquette then
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,502
And1: 7,107
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#16 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:55 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:arizona

total of nba players: 62 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 2 ( low) (Iguodala, arenas)

notable: kerr (coaching bonus?) budinger, ayton (still not quite an star career yet) richard jefferson, sean elliot, bibby

vs

michigan

total of nba players: 59 ( High)

mvp level players: 0 (low)

notable all star level players: 3 ( mid) (glen rice, webber, tomjamovich)

notable: jalen rose, juwan howard, jamal crawford

Vs

Marquette

total of nba players: 44 ( mid)

mvp level players: 2 (high) wade and butler

notable all star level players: 4? ( mid) (wade, butler maurice lucas, doc rivers)

notable: jae crowder

I wont consider serbia or france yet as marquette top 2 clearly beats gobert/parker and jokic/divac (jokic career may come to eclipse wade in the future thanks to longevity but that is not to discuss here yet)

Marquette wins this at the top while arizona wins it with depth, so i am gonna go marquettw for now



This sort of speaks to what I was saying above. While you stated you weren't really looking at number of All-Stars as anything other than perhaps a tie-breaker, in your own accounting above you appear to be using whether or not they ever actually received an All-Star selection as the minimum threshold to designate them "All-Star level".

Inasmuch as Doc Rivers, Maurice Lucas, Rudy Tomjanovich, and even Pete Maravich were ever legitimately "All-Star level", so were probably all of Mike Bibby, DeAndre Ayton, Jason Terry, and Richard Jefferson [for at least a season or two each].


Is not that i think only players selected for all star were real all star level players, i would have iguodala as all star even without one for example

But they are useful to me with players i am unknowledgeable about so i dont underate (so much) schools with older talent i didnt know about much. They are useful to give me an idea on how to weight older players i am unsure about

Of the guys you mention i dont weight ayton too much yet cause longevity, only 2 seasons of what i consider borderline all star play, i think i would have jefferson,terry and bibby as borderline all stars who make a serious difference in my admiteddly arvitrary criteria

(Superstar first>star>low end all star>good players depth) where if thinghs are close i give more weight to top end talent
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#17 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:09 pm

I'm gonna put my tentative votes out there:

1. Ohio State
2. Houston
3. Indiana


OSU - Again, just a nice combination of star-power and depth at this stage.

Houston - Less depth than several still on the table, but Hakeem at the top and followed up with Clyde and Hayes makes up for a lot. Could see going with 3rd place [or even top HM] with them here......but otoh, could also see going with them at 1st.

Indiana - No true MVP-tier guys, but more than a handful of stars, and decent depth behind. Isiah, Bellamy, McGinnis, the Van Arsdales, plus Jon McGlocklin, Victor Oladipo, Eric Gordon, Quinn Buckner, etc. It's a fairly impressive list for this stage. Their case is sort of similar to OSU, just not quite as impressive as the OSU list imo (which includes Havlicek, Neil Johnston, Jerry Lucas, Mike Conley, Arnie Risen, Michael Redd, Jim Jackson, Herb Williams, Larry Siegfried, Derek Anderson).


Really thought about Arizona; still think their depth is impressive. Although it's worth noting that Chris Mills and Bison Dele are actually shared with another university [Kentucky for Mills, Maryland for Dele]; halving their WS would actually push Arizona behind OSU in total win shares, fwiw.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
jalengreen
Starter
Posts: 2,176
And1: 1,926
Joined: Aug 09, 2021
   

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#18 » by jalengreen » Wed Jun 22, 2022 7:00 pm

trex_8063 wrote:Anyone else thinking about Arizona? (I guess falcolombardi did at least give them a mention)

Their depth of talent is pretty impressive. No MVP-tier players, but a relative TON of "good" NBA careers.

One of the things I've been listing is All-Star selections from each source, but there's a ton of noise to that. For example, Houston has 38, and Arizona has just 6.
But consider the following:

Otis Birdsong (Houston): 4 All-Stars

Andre Iguodala, Mike Bibby, Jason Terry, Richard Jefferson, and DeAndre Ayton combined (Arizona): 1 All-Star

Does that seem equitable?


I think Arizona is likely to be an honorable mention for me at this stage. They're not in my top 3 but will probably show up in my ballot soon. I do think I favor Indiana over them though along with the 3 on my ballot
jalengreen
Starter
Posts: 2,176
And1: 1,926
Joined: Aug 09, 2021
   

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#19 » by jalengreen » Wed Jun 22, 2022 7:05 pm

falcolombardi wrote:What are you guys thoughts on

Marquette- i am being too high on their top 4 despite them being underwhelming after that

Arizona- how to evaluate their depth of talebt but lack of star careers,iggy and arenas short career coming the closest (i dont weight ayton two borderline all star seasons too high yet he still has a lpt of room tl grow and his high end playrt longevity is not even as good as ben simmons who i am not even that high on as a career

Lousiana- am i being too harsh on maravich?

Spain-is gasol, gasol, luka (2 stars with long careers and a superstar with a very short career) + players like rubio and ibaka do they matchup favorably with marquette already? Should i give them bonus point for how good luka likely will be in the future (do wr consider expectatives for the future here?)

Frances vs arizona, france arguabky has the top 2 career and they have a decent depth of talent too wuth diaw and batum should they get more consideration among the no-mvp level player schools/spurces?

I see serbia a tad below spain/france still, jokic career is too short to tske over gobert or the gasols yet and divac is great but not better than the gasols or parker/gobert

Spain/france depth of succesful talebt like rubio amd ibaka beats serbia guys for me

Should harden/dort arizona stsrt to enter our radar?

How high are we on michigan top 3 of webber/tomjanovich and rice?

What do we do of the top heavy sources left like san francisco, germany (who also have detlef schremp who may bridge the gap between dirk and russel) davidson


Marquette is an interesting one, will have to consider them more strongly.

I think Cincinnati would beat out Davidson for me. If you call Oscar/Steph close to a wash, Twyman is probably the main difference maker. Van Exel and Kenyon Martin to offer some depth.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,597
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Top Pro Talent Sources of All-Time: #11 

Post#20 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 9:38 pm

falcolombardi wrote:What are you guys thoughts on

Marquette- i am being too high on their top 4 despite them being underwhelming after that


There's a few other names worth mentioning, but the extended depth is sort of poor compared to many others. fwiw, I inserted their numbers and rank in my post above citing different metrics. They rate out......OK. Perhaps a reasonable honourable mention, but not a solid top-3 contender, imo.


falcolombardi wrote:Lousiana- am i being too harsh on maravich?


imo, no. He's the most overrated player in NBA history, if you ask me. A poor man's DeMar DeRozan, with worse longevity (but more flash, more innovation [relative to era], and a much more storied college career).


falcolombardi wrote:Spain-is gasol, gasol, luka (2 stars with long careers and a superstar with a very short career) + players like rubio and ibaka do they matchup favorably with marquette already? Should i give them bonus point for how good luka likely will be in the future (do wr consider expectatives for the future here?)


Yeah, I need to figure out "how much of" Luka and Serge I want to give Spain "credit" for. My methodology in these players who are split between sources, is to come of with a rough estimate how much should be credited to where [e.g. 50/50? 60/40? etc], and then break up his career as such, just so I have some figures to easily contemplate.
Note that my numbers for Spain in above post do NOT include any of Serge Ibaka or Luka Doncic. I'll get on that soon; it may well boost Spain into contention (at least somewhere in the next 2-4 threads).


falcolombardi wrote:Frances vs arizona, france arguabky has the top 2 career and they have a decent depth of talent too wuth diaw and batum should they get more consideration among the no-mvp level player schools/spurces?


I will add in France to my listing soon, too. My gut is no, not yet. Not when there are teams like Houston, LSU, and probably OSU who have better top 2, and more depth besides.
Vs Arizona??? I guess it depends on how you weigh things, regarding depth vs stars.


falcolombardi wrote:Should harden/dort arizona stsrt to enter our radar?


Definitely not until Houston, OSU, Marquette, LSU, probably some others are off the table. Harden's not THAT great.


falcolombardi wrote:How high are we on michigan top 3 of webber/tomjanovich and rice?


Definitely below the top 3 of Houston, LSU, Marquette, Ohio State, Texas, Indiana, probably even Notre Dame (Dantley, Laimbeer + one of Woolridge or Carr, probably), as well as France, possibly some others.

falcolombardi wrote:What do we do of the top heavy sources left like san francisco, germany (who also have detlef schremp who may bridge the gap between dirk and russel) davidson


Detlef is a tough one to credit to Germany. He spent his childhood there, and had a couple years in whatever youth semi-pro league, but then relocated to America, playing one year of highschool ball [Western Zone, fwiw] and then playing college ball at the University of Washington (four full seasons, showing MASSIVE improvement while in college).
So I'd be most inclined to credit him to Washington U.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

Return to Player Comparisons