hickfromfrenchlick wrote:Cornbread wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
Stop it.
Hey, he has 81 followers! Big time!
A call like that would last 4 minutes, not 4 hours.
Or 4 seconds
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
               hickfromfrenchlick wrote:Cornbread wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
Stop it.
Hey, he has 81 followers! Big time!
A call like that would last 4 minutes, not 4 hours.
KamikazeK wrote:Why are we posting all these random-ass tweets from random-ass people with zero credibility? It needs to stop.
165bows wrote:aim2please wrote:ViperGTS wrote:
If that deal wasn't negotiated with that exact scenario in mind by Danny, then that's another in the fireable offense category.
Man, you need to chill.
The fact that the pick is not conveyed if it's lower than 5 is a clear sign that possibility of Lakers improving was considered. PG coming out with this statement today, even thought 3 days ago he was on the record saying that he'll play out his contract with the Pacers, is not something you can predict. Hence, my original post.
---------------------------
*Tin foil hat on*
Timing of this was planned by the Lakers to screw up Celtics.
My homertastic conspiracy theory:
PG wants a winning team (ie, not LA, but Boston).
A few pieces supporting this reasoning:
Who did George say he was looking forward to meeting at the AS game? Thomas.
Who did Zach Lowe say George would love to have come home and play in Indiana?
Celtics target Gordon Hayward.
Reputable reporter Bobby Marks, former front office guy, has gone out of his way to say he thinks a good Boston trade for George is Crowder/Rozier/Zeller, an unthinkable underpay.
End result? The current situation.
Celtics trading straight up for George would suck their assets dry. However, George that is an impending FA going to LA has little trade value, and suddenly Boston opens up as a possibility. A possibility that, because of the timing of Boston's cap space, isn't a FA option. Indiana is then forced to trade him for pennies on the dollar in order to not lose him for nothing, "to LA."
Counter point: LeBron and George are teaming up in LA in next summer, and zero things could get in the way of that.
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               GoCeltics123 wrote:hickfromfrenchlick wrote:Cornbread wrote:Stop it.
Hey, he has 81 followers! Big time!
A call like that would last 4 minutes, not 4 hours.
Or 4 seconds

 
                                                                                                           
                                      
                                                                       
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
               bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
               chrisab123 wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
I won't believe it until Sherrod tweets that it won't happen.
 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
               Fruit Pastilles wrote:
Schultz is a clown.
 
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                          
Fruit Pastilles wrote:165bows wrote:aim2please wrote:
Man, you need to chill.
The fact that the pick is not conveyed if it's lower than 5 is a clear sign that possibility of Lakers improving was considered. PG coming out with this statement today, even thought 3 days ago he was on the record saying that he'll play out his contract with the Pacers, is not something you can predict. Hence, my original post.
---------------------------
*Tin foil hat on*
Timing of this was planned by the Lakers to screw up Celtics.
My homertastic conspiracy theory:
PG wants a winning team (ie, not LA, but Boston).
A few pieces supporting this reasoning:
Who did George say he was looking forward to meeting at the AS game? Thomas.
Who did Zach Lowe say George would love to have come home and play in Indiana?
Celtics target Gordon Hayward.
Reputable reporter Bobby Marks, former front office guy, has gone out of his way to say he thinks a good Boston trade for George is Crowder/Rozier/Zeller, an unthinkable underpay.
End result? The current situation.
Celtics trading straight up for George would suck their assets dry. However, George that is an impending FA going to LA has little trade value, and suddenly Boston opens up as a possibility. A possibility that, because of the timing of Boston's cap space, isn't a FA option. Indiana is then forced to trade him for pennies on the dollar in order to not lose him for nothing, "to LA."
Counter point: LeBron and George are teaming up in LA in next summer, and zero things could get in the way of that.
Keep going, I'm almost there.
 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
               neno wrote:I'm hoping Danny pulls out at the last minute to extract reasonable value (protection? Give me a break)

 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                
                    
                    
                   