Image ImageImage Image

Options to fix the PF hole

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,337
And1: 9,173
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1041 » by sco » Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:36 pm

weneeda2guard wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
weneeda2guard wrote:At this point I'm getting the feeling akme is simply holding the pf seat warm until Patrick Williams gets back.

And honestly Patrick Williams is who we need at the pf.

I'm not willing to give up bench scoring and depth for a guy to come here and grab 9 rebounds.
The idea of PWill is what we need at PF, but the current iteration is not that.

Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app

Lol it's year 2

What we need from the 4 is

Rebounding
Outside scoring
Good passing from the post
Rim protection
Defensive switches
Being able to step out on shooters
Being able to defend the pick and roll
Getting through screens
Can move his feet on defense
Can defend the back cuts

Patrick Williams checks the boxes on all of that.
Especially based on how Donovan runs his offense. We don't need a pf who will make the ball stick. Only other player who might fit that role is jerami Grant but he not great enough to give up even more assets for especially since we have Patrick Williams here on a rookie deal.

I am optimistic about Pat's future, but he's average, to below average at:
Rebounding
Good passing from the post
Rim protection
Being able to defend the pick and roll
Getting through screens
Can move his feet on defense
Can defend the back cuts

Not to say he can't improve, but his timeline isn't this year or next year to be better than either Green or DJJ.
:clap:
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1042 » by TheSuzerain » Thu Jan 20, 2022 12:20 am

GoBlue72391 wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:I'd love to trade for THT as an improving asset for the future, but I don't really see him being all that useful for us this year. The shot just isn't there yet.
No hostility intended, but were you the one suggesting we sign THT to a huge contract in the off-season? Maybe even a max, I don't remember.

My point is it's crazy how quickly a player's value can change in just a few months. I wouldn't want THT unless we blew it up and started rebuilding.

Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app

His "max" was like 19 million a year or something.

Fans are fickle. I don't think THT's actual value has changed a heck of a lot. Perhaps his value to the Lakers has declined as he is not someone to play next to a Westbrook/LeBron tandem (although only a complete idiot would want to build around a Westbrook/Anyone tandem, but I digress).

The Lakers are a nightmare in terms of roster construction. I'd absolutely be looking for talent that they're selling for cheap because the roster fit is a mess.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,386
And1: 9,081
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1043 » by Chi town » Thu Jan 20, 2022 12:29 am

TheSuzerain wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:I'd love to trade for THT as an improving asset for the future, but I don't really see him being all that useful for us this year. The shot just isn't there yet.
No hostility intended, but were you the one suggesting we sign THT to a huge contract in the off-season? Maybe even a max, I don't remember.

My point is it's crazy how quickly a player's value can change in just a few months. I wouldn't want THT unless we blew it up and started rebuilding.

Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app

His "max" was like 19 million a year or something.

Fans are fickle. I don't think THT's actual value has changed a heck of a lot. Perhaps his value to the Lakers has declined as he is not someone to play next to a Westbrook/LeBron tandem (although only a complete idiot would want to build around a Westbrook/Anyone tandem, but I digress).

The Lakers are a nightmare in terms of roster construction. I'd absolutely be looking for talent that they're selling for cheap because the roster fit is a mess.

That already happened w Kuzma.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1044 » by prolific passer » Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:18 am

Wizards are in the 8th spot and with the east being so wide open they are only 5 games out of first. Doubt they will be trading anybody right now.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,712
And1: 6,955
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1045 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:13 am

weneeda2guard wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
weneeda2guard wrote:At this point I'm getting the feeling akme is simply holding the pf seat warm until Patrick Williams gets back.

And honestly Patrick Williams is who we need at the pf.

I'm not willing to give up bench scoring and depth for a guy to come here and grab 9 rebounds.
The idea of PWill is what we need at PF, but the current iteration is not that.

Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app

Lol it's year 2

What we need from the 4 is

Rebounding
Outside scoring
Good passing from the post
Rim protection
Defensive switches
Being able to step out on shooters
Being able to defend the pick and roll
Getting through screens
Can move his feet on defense
Can defend the back cuts

Patrick Williams checks the boxes on all of that.
Especially based on how Donovan runs his offense. We don't need a pf who will make the ball stick. Only other player who might fit that role is jerami Grant but he not great enough to give up even more assets for especially since we have Patrick Williams here on a rookie deal.

What does this being PWill's 2nd year have to do with anything? I never said he's a finished product, just that the potential of PWill may indeed be what we need at PF, but the player he is today is not that. And there's no guarantee he ever becomes that player, and even if he does, it might not happen until our window has already closed.

And you're being incredibly generous to PWill with at least half of that list. Has PWill ever posted up even once in his NBA career? How the hell can anyone know if he's a good passer from the post when he's almost never posted up? That's just one example of many from your list. People confuse potential with current ability.
Bulls2021
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 544
Joined: Nov 13, 2021

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1046 » by Bulls2021 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:22 am

Posted this in the other thread, but you're at the point where you start looking for a team that would like to swap a PF for a guard (Coby). Coby has been damn good lately, but guard is our deepest position.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1047 » by prolific passer » Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:26 am

Bulls2021 wrote:Posted this in the other thread, but you're at the point where you start looking for a team that would like to swap a PF for a guard (Coby). Coby has been damn good lately, but guard is our deepest position.

Hard to get rid of Coby when your 2 starting guards are both out. Also he becomes valuable as a 6th man due to his scoring streak he is currently on.
Bulls2021
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 544
Joined: Nov 13, 2021

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1048 » by Bulls2021 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:47 am

prolific passer wrote:
Bulls2021 wrote:Posted this in the other thread, but you're at the point where you start looking for a team that would like to swap a PF for a guard (Coby). Coby has been damn good lately, but guard is our deepest position.

Hard to get rid of Coby when your 2 starting guards are both out. Also he becomes valuable as a 6th man due to his scoring streak he is currently on.

We don't have a PF, period. That's more important than a 6th man when you're already ridiculously deep with guards.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1049 » by prolific passer » Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:49 am

Bulls2021 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Bulls2021 wrote:Posted this in the other thread, but you're at the point where you start looking for a team that would like to swap a PF for a guard (Coby). Coby has been damn good lately, but guard is our deepest position.

Hard to get rid of Coby when your 2 starting guards are both out. Also he becomes valuable as a 6th man due to his scoring streak he is currently on.

We don't have a PF, period. That's more important than a 6th man when you're already ridiculously deep with guards.

Bulls can probably get a decent/average power forward without trading Coby.
Bulls2021
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 544
Joined: Nov 13, 2021

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1050 » by Bulls2021 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:09 am

prolific passer wrote:
Bulls2021 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Hard to get rid of Coby when your 2 starting guards are both out. Also he becomes valuable as a 6th man due to his scoring streak he is currently on.

We don't have a PF, period. That's more important than a 6th man when you're already ridiculously deep with guards.

Bulls can probably get a decent/average power forward without trading Coby.

Like who? The whole point of dealing Coby is to get a better PF, not some scrap heap buyout candidate like you're thinking of.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1051 » by prolific passer » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:16 am

Bulls2021 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Bulls2021 wrote:We don't have a PF, period. That's more important than a 6th man when you're already ridiculously deep with guards.

Bulls can probably get a decent/average power forward without trading Coby.

Like who? The whole point of dealing Coby is to get a better PF, not some scrap heap buyout candidate like you're thinking of.

Bulls don't really a power forward on the roster. So any decent power forward is better than what they have now.
Bulls2021
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 544
Joined: Nov 13, 2021

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1052 » by Bulls2021 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:18 am

prolific passer wrote:
Bulls2021 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Bulls can probably get a decent/average power forward without trading Coby.

Like who? The whole point of dealing Coby is to get a better PF, not some scrap heap buyout candidate like you're thinking of.

Bulls don't really a power forward on the roster. So any decent power forward is better than what they have now.

But why not get a better one? They aren't keeping Coby AND Ayo two years from nows. Deal from a strength and get a good PF.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1053 » by prolific passer » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:30 am

What do the bulls do with Lonzo if he continues to get hurt and Coby and Ayo continue their great play? Lonzo's contract though? :/
User avatar
dawhizz
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,308
And1: 601
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1054 » by dawhizz » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:58 am

I’m not sure how we get him, as he’s on a pretty cheap deal for the next two years, but Trey Lyles makes sense to me as a cheaper option.
"I'd go with Tyrus Thomas at small forward." - Sam Smith
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,169
And1: 7,842
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1055 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:37 pm

Think I've talked myself out of Jerami Grant.

1. I'm wary of the extension money he wants.

2. I'm wary of the offensive role he wants.

3. After soul searching, I'm not convinced this is our go-for-broke moment. We don't have that Milwaukee/BKN/GSW or even Miami fastball. I could easily see a situation where we knock off one of them in the playoffs, but beating two or three would require a tremendous amount of luck. I'm leaning toward being highly competitive now while preserving a couple young pieces (some combo of Pat, Coby, Ayo, Lonzo, draft picks) for a near-future reboot built around a true superstar. I know Jokic in 2023 seems a bit pie in the sky, but hoping Grant is the piece that covers for our lack of a top 10 guy is even more aspirational IMHO.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,992
And1: 3,621
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1056 » by MGB8 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:42 pm

Kelly Olynyk came back last night. He'd definitely be a 5 in the Bulls' system, but he'd be a huge (though modestly expensive - 12M salary) upgrade to Tony Bradley - Olynyk is a very good player who can play the hub role at the 5 and is not awful defensively. In fact, he used to be quick enough to play the 4 a bit - though I doubt that's still the case.

DJJ (who is out for the next 4-6) plus Simonovic or Bradley (salary) plus the Portland pick feels like a mild overpay... but I wonder if that could be expanded into a 3 team deal with Josh Jackson or Trey Lyles heading to the Clippers (for a look-see at a younger player) and Batum heading to Chicago....

If that would be doable - and let's assume Simonovic is worth a little more to Detroit (less expensive next year - either due to Bradley opting out or in; hope for greater growth) and that the Clipps take Lyles to save 700K on salary (and whatever multiple of that it is with the lux tax)... new depth chart:

cc: Vuc, Olynyk, Bradley
f: Batum, Green, McKinnie, M.Hill
w: DD, TBJr., (Caruso), (McKinnie)
g: Zach, Coby, Thomas
g: Ball(?), Ayo, Caruso, (LaVine/DD/Coby)
PistolP
Analyst
Posts: 3,266
And1: 387
Joined: Sep 13, 2011

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1057 » by PistolP » Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:55 am

Read on Twitter

Second try is a charm
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,733
And1: 2,277
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1058 » by biggestbullsfan » Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:58 am

PistolP wrote:
Read on Twitter

Second try is a charm


I’d take him but not for any real assets. Nothing significant. I’d rather sign him outright.

Also, he should’ve gave came to us first. Brooklyn had 2 PF already before he got there.
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,476
And1: 13,579
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1059 » by FriedRise » Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:01 am

Read on Twitter


Is he still productive? Wish we would’ve landed LMA.
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 16,135
And1: 7,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#1060 » by Wingy » Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:04 am

PistolP wrote:
Read on Twitter

Second try is a charm


Seems like a strong indicator that he’s washed up. Outside the big 3, Mills and Harris, the rest of that roster is...let’s put it nicely and say uninspiring.

Return to Chicago Bulls