TechMansoor wrote:
The only word out of his camp was a statement by attorney Daniel E. Reidy, who said Rose cooperated in an investigation by Memphis that uncovered "no wrongdoing on his part."
http://www.nba.com/2009/news/05/30/rose ... index.html
From the above article:
"He was a smart student since he's been in grammar school," Danyell Freeman said. "I don't think he needs [anybody] to take tests for him. He's been getting good grades. He's always been smart in school so why would he need somebody to take the SAT for him?"
Added Keke Shelby, who has known Rose as long as she can remember: "They want to see him back out here, doing nothing, but he was always a smart student so why try to take that away from him?"
These comments from his friends are interesting. If it is true that he got "good grades" and also true that someone took the SAT for him, whoever sat apparently wasn't sharp enough to get the 800 to 850-ish combined score needed to match his GPA on the sliding scale. (NCAA eligibility requirements linked on the bottom of the last page). Geesh, if you are going to get a ringer at least get a sharp ringer.
As to the "no wrongdoing" quote...yeah. Derrick's lawyer's public statement. THAT puts everything to rest, for sure.
I'm still waiting to hear more about the alleged illicit payoffs to Brother Reggie.