R3AL1TY wrote:Durant showed why he will be very important against the Lebrons. If Curry or Klay go on a drought, Durant can carry the team.
Durant is their best player. Of course he will be important.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
R3AL1TY wrote:Durant showed why he will be very important against the Lebrons. If Curry or Klay go on a drought, Durant can carry the team.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
kyrv wrote:R3AL1TY wrote:Durant showed why he will be very important against the Lebrons. If Curry or Klay go on a drought, Durant can carry the team.
Durant is their best player. Of course he will be important.
tong po wrote:MrSparkle wrote:Basketball should have no salary cap. Make somebody pay $100m salary for Lebron if they want to.
Of course, then you'd have LAL/NYK/BRK/GSW just buy up all the best talent and not think twice.
Just have a very punitive luxury tax. That is more effective than anything - just look at this franchise for proof of that.
If Ballmer or Prokhorov want to blow $300million or something for a year, hey go ahead - most of that money's actually going to the other teams.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
kyrv wrote:tong po wrote:MrSparkle wrote:Basketball should have no salary cap. Make somebody pay $100m salary for Lebron if they want to.
Of course, then you'd have LAL/NYK/BRK/GSW just buy up all the best talent and not think twice.
Just have a very punitive luxury tax. That is more effective than anything - just look at this franchise for proof of that.
If Ballmer or Prokhorov want to blow $300million or something for a year, hey go ahead - most of that money's actually going to the other teams.
One cheap franchise doesn't prove the rule, in fact as I understand it here, the Bulls are the exception in caring about finances.
A punitive tax that prevents one cheap team from spending when they wouldn't anyway, doesn't resolve a league wide issue.
A few teams giving out money to other teams does not help the balance. It helps the pockets of the other teams, doesn't help the on court product.
the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:G Buckets wrote:
what?
rondo/Val/payne
CJ/Wade/grant
Engles/zip
James Johnson/niko
rolo/chris/niko
im down wit dat! 2 great shooters and 1-2 good shooters on the floor at all times. 3-4 tough nosed defenders on the court as well with those shooters(some of them the same guy).
team ball!! ball movement. these guys will play for each other and make each other better. James and CJ and even wade and rondo can all get shots and play make. that team wins 45 games. 6 seed. ECF's. fa sho!
Why not just add Johnson and Engles to compliment Jimmy? You move Jimmy out for a worse player in CJ and you only get a 4 win difference. Hell this Bulls roster would have been 4-5 games better if the young players wouldn't have been so hot and cold or Rondo wasn't terrible the majority of the season.
stilldropin20 wrote:the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:
rondo/Val/payne
CJ/Wade/grant
Engles/zip
James Johnson/niko
rolo/chris/niko
im down wit dat! 2 great shooters and 1-2 good shooters on the floor at all times. 3-4 tough nosed defenders on the court as well with those shooters(some of them the same guy).
team ball!! ball movement. these guys will play for each other and make each other better. James and CJ and even wade and rondo can all get shots and play make. that team wins 45 games. 6 seed. ECF's. fa sho!
Why not just add Johnson and Engles to compliment Jimmy? You move Jimmy out for a worse player in CJ and you only get a 4 win difference. Hell this Bulls roster would have been 4-5 games better if the young players wouldn't have been so hot and cold or Rondo wasn't terrible the majority of the season.
better and easier foundation to build around CJ than to build around Jimmy. jimmy won make ingles and JJ better. CJ does by virtue of his elite 3 pt shooting and ability to score at the rim and mid range floaters as well. CJ's scoring is not dependant on the refs whistle. jimmy's is. which means you need the refs on your side. which is more "luck" dependent. Once a player bully ball fades and that player who's efficiency is FT depenedant no longer get s those calls that player is almost useless. even shaq became useless at some point.
R3AL1TY wrote:wait a minute...I'm watching the Raptors against the Lebrons...Deron Williams just went down after the Raptors scored a bucket. It was a non call with PJ Tucker moving his forearms towards him while Ibaka got the basket, yet the refs get to do a replay on a non foul call to see if it is a tech or a flagrant? smh
This replay system is just holding up the game more than before.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
tong po wrote:kyrv wrote:tong po wrote:Just have a very punitive luxury tax. That is more effective than anything - just look at this franchise for proof of that.
If Ballmer or Prokhorov want to blow $300million or something for a year, hey go ahead - most of that money's actually going to the other teams.
One cheap franchise doesn't prove the rule, in fact as I understand it here, the Bulls are the exception in caring about finances.
A punitive tax that prevents one cheap team from spending when they wouldn't anyway, doesn't resolve a league wide issue.
A few teams giving out money to other teams does not help the balance. It helps the pockets of the other teams, doesn't help the on court product.
It isn't just the Bulls though. Look how the Knicks didn't bother keeping Lin because of it. The Clippers this summer are absolutely not going to keep everybody on that roster even though they have the richest owner.
Even rich guys don't like losing hundreds of millions of dollars every year on players. They would really just end up hurting each other, which is exactly why they implemented these rules on themselves.
If you have a luxury tax that is punitive enough to basically act as a de facto hard salary cap, that is all you really need. When paying Chris Paul, say, $60million a year actually means $120million or even more a year, no owner's going to do that.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:the ultimates wrote:
Why not just add Johnson and Engles to compliment Jimmy? You move Jimmy out for a worse player in CJ and you only get a 4 win difference. Hell this Bulls roster would have been 4-5 games better if the young players wouldn't have been so hot and cold or Rondo wasn't terrible the majority of the season.
better and easier foundation to build around CJ than to build around Jimmy. jimmy won make ingles and JJ better. CJ does by virtue of his elite 3 pt shooting and ability to score at the rim and mid range floaters as well. CJ's scoring is not dependant on the refs whistle. jimmy's is. which means you need the refs on your side. which is more "luck" dependent. Once a player bully ball fades and that player who's efficiency is FT depenedant no longer get s those calls that player is almost useless. even shaq became useless at some point.
Getting to the foul line or if not fouled getting into the paint causes just as many problems for the defense. That makes role players particularly shooters better but it wouldn't make Ingles or Johnson better Drawing fouls is an underrated and often overlooked skill. Remember when people were begging Derrick in his mvp year to draw more fouls? That doesn't just suddenly go away. Is Jimmy all of sudden not going to be strong next year and draw and power through contact. I'll take Jimmy being an elite player into his 12th and 13th like Shaq was. Small guards like CJ even if they can shoot start to fall off greatly around 29-30 years old.
ChicagoStrong wrote:The NBA isn't even watchable anymore.


stilldropin20 wrote:the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:
rondo/Val/payne
CJ/Wade/grant
Engles/zip
James Johnson/niko
rolo/chris/niko
im down wit dat! 2 great shooters and 1-2 good shooters on the floor at all times. 3-4 tough nosed defenders on the court as well with those shooters(some of them the same guy).
team ball!! ball movement. these guys will play for each other and make each other better. James and CJ and even wade and rondo can all get shots and play make. that team wins 45 games. 6 seed. ECF's. fa sho!
Why not just add Johnson and Engles to compliment Jimmy? You move Jimmy out for a worse player in CJ and you only get a 4 win difference. Hell this Bulls roster would have been 4-5 games better if the young players wouldn't have been so hot and cold or Rondo wasn't terrible the majority of the season.
better and easier foundation to build around CJ than to build around Jimmy. jimmy won make ingles and JJ better. CJ does by virtue of his elite 3 pt shooting and ability to score at the rim and mid range floaters as well. CJ's scoring is not dependant on the refs whistle. jimmy's is. which means you need the refs on your side. which is more "luck" dependent. Once a player bully ball fades and that player who's efficiency is FT depenedant no longer get s those calls that player is almost useless. even shaq became useless at some point.
stilldropin20 wrote:the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:
better and easier foundation to build around CJ than to build around Jimmy. jimmy won make ingles and JJ better. CJ does by virtue of his elite 3 pt shooting and ability to score at the rim and mid range floaters as well. CJ's scoring is not dependant on the refs whistle. jimmy's is. which means you need the refs on your side. which is more "luck" dependent. Once a player bully ball fades and that player who's efficiency is FT depenedant no longer get s those calls that player is almost useless. even shaq became useless at some point.
Getting to the foul line or if not fouled getting into the paint causes just as many problems for the defense. That makes role players particularly shooters better but it wouldn't make Ingles or Johnson better Drawing fouls is an underrated and often overlooked skill. Remember when people were begging Derrick in his mvp year to draw more fouls? That doesn't just suddenly go away. Is Jimmy all of sudden not going to be strong next year and draw and power through contact. I'll take Jimmy being an elite player into his 12th and 13th like Shaq was. Small guards like CJ even if they can shoot start to fall off greatly around 29-30 years old.
"power and athletic" based players tend to get hurt more. and always near the end of the season. we've had plenty of experience with that with Rose. Jimmy has been knicked up now for 2 different post seasons (if we are to believe jimmy was even hurt?). hurt or not. he was atrocious in games 3-6. bulls got backdoor swept. blown out by an average of 25 frickin points.
and boston aint even that good. we have seen what a jimmy led team can do. Jimmy is not 19 or 20. he will be 28 before the season starts. his athletic decline has already begun. he doesn't have the skills like elite ball handling or shooting or just good ol' fashioned nuanced ball fakes and eye brow fakes that translate into being great beyond age 30-31. He is just NOT A BASKETBALL SAVANT. This is it for Jimmy. he likely just had his best year ever. it took us to 41 aweful wins. a brutal season.
CJ miles however is indeed a basketball savant. and has polished handles and shooting to go with his floor game.
He is not undersized. Because he is a PG in the modern NBA. and in terms of "size." avery bradley just manhandled Jimmy in the boston series. so size is over rated. see Niko as well.
CJ is 25. basketball savants always improve. sometimes until their mid 30's. when a player like him cant be the #1 option anymore he will still be lethal off ball like ray allen was until his late 30's. they improve by many means. some of which is by teaching young guys how to play better (the right way). the sum of the parts is always stronger than any 1 or 2 individual basketball players. The 60's celtics and 80's lakers and Celtic 90's Bulls SA Spurs over the last 20 years and early pre durant warriors taught us this. Early Shaq and Kobe teams didn't play off each other well at all. PJ taught the lakers how to play for each other as well as brought in players that would teach those 2 to do just that on the court and they 3-peated. CJ Mcollum gets all that and just said the same on TV 2 nights ago about this years spurs team.
These nuanced ideas in basketball are simply just lost on jimmy. i mean we had a former MVP "point guard" on the team and Jimmy answer a question in the summer a few years ago about what posiiton he plays. "point guard." i mean jimmy is kinda dumb.he plays a dumb brand of basketball and says and does dumb things. he seldom if ever does things off ball to make his team mates better. i almost never see jimmy take himself out of a play or make a cut that clears the lane for another player. instead he stands there, clogs that lane with himself and his defender and makes it harder. wade does the same. Yet Jimmy recruited wade and clamored for wade. and butt buddied with wade. and intelligent player/leader of the team would simply go to wade and say, "bruh, we need you to do some things differently." thats part of the reason why the role players look night and day difference with jimmy and wade. NOTE!!! I didn't say the only reason. but its part of the reason. and jimmy either doesn't get this. or doesn't have the balls to stand up to wade and encourage wade to modify his role because he doesn't sense the urgency. and thats in addition to bring close to nothing getting almost nothing out of the role players once rondo went down.
CJ Mcollum OTOH took it to GS, the number #1 defense in the league bar none. and thats with poor offensive fit in lillard dominating the ball.
lillard and Jimmy almost deserve each other. and for what both jimmy and lillard want to do. they are a better fit personality wise. i'd love to give them to each other. love that.
bring CJ over here who would be a young Ray allen type to pair with Rondo(a team first player and solid defender). Sign James Johnson (also a team player good defender)and Joe Ingles(very much a team player and tough nosed defender). groom Zip, grant, and Val with them and thats pretty decent team. maybe payne can be the selfish gunner off the bench? with wade?
i'm ready for a new direction.

stilldropin20 wrote:the ultimates wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:
better and easier foundation to build around CJ than to build around Jimmy. jimmy won make ingles and JJ better. CJ does by virtue of his elite 3 pt shooting and ability to score at the rim and mid range floaters as well. CJ's scoring is not dependant on the refs whistle. jimmy's is. which means you need the refs on your side. which is more "luck" dependent. Once a player bully ball fades and that player who's efficiency is FT depenedant no longer get s those calls that player is almost useless. even shaq became useless at some point.
Getting to the foul line or if not fouled getting into the paint causes just as many problems for the defense. That makes role players particularly shooters better but it wouldn't make Ingles or Johnson better Drawing fouls is an underrated and often overlooked skill. Remember when people were begging Derrick in his mvp year to draw more fouls? That doesn't just suddenly go away. Is Jimmy all of sudden not going to be strong next year and draw and power through contact. I'll take Jimmy being an elite player into his 12th and 13th like Shaq was. Small guards like CJ even if they can shoot start to fall off greatly around 29-30 years old.
"power and athletic" based players tend to get hurt more. and always near the end of the season. we've had plenty of experience with that with Rose. Jimmy has been knicked up now for 2 different post seasons (if we are to believe jimmy was even hurt?). hurt or not. he was atrocious in games 3-6. bulls got backdoor swept. blown out by an average of 25 frickin points.
and boston aint even that good. we have seen what a jimmy led team can do. Jimmy is not 19 or 20. he will be 28 before the season starts. his athletic decline has already begun. he doesn't have the skills like elite ball handling or shooting or just good ol' fashioned nuanced ball fakes and eye brow fakes that translate into being great beyond age 30-31. He is just NOT A BASKETBALL SAVANT. This is it for Jimmy. he likely just had his best year ever. it took us to 41 aweful wins. a brutal season.
CJ miles however is indeed a basketball savant. and has polished handles and shooting to go with his floor game.
He is not undersized. Because he is a PG in the modern NBA. and in terms of "size." avery bradley just manhandled Jimmy in the boston series. so size is over rated. see Niko as well.
CJ is 25. basketball savants always improve. sometimes until their mid 30's. when a player like him cant be the #1 option anymore he will still be lethal off ball like ray allen was until his late 30's. they improve by many means. some of which is by teaching young guys how to play better (the right way). the sum of the parts is always stronger than any 1 or 2 individual basketball players. The 60's celtics and 80's lakers and Celtic 90's Bulls SA Spurs over the last 20 years and early pre durant warriors taught us this. Early Shaq and Kobe teams didn't play off each other well at all. PJ taught the lakers how to play for each other as well as brought in players that would teach those 2 to do just that on the court and they 3-peated. CJ Mcollum gets all that and just said the same on TV 2 nights ago about this years spurs team.
These nuanced ideas in basketball are simply just lost on jimmy. i mean we had a former MVP "point guard" on the team and Jimmy answer a question in the summer a few years ago about what posiiton he plays. "point guard." i mean jimmy is kinda dumb.he plays a dumb brand of basketball and says and does dumb things. he seldom if ever does things off ball to make his team mates better. i almost never see jimmy take himself out of a play or make a cut that clears the lane for another player. instead he stands there, clogs that lane with himself and his defender and makes it harder. wade does the same. Yet Jimmy recruited wade and clamored for wade. and butt buddied with wade. and intelligent player/leader of the team would simply go to wade and say, "bruh, we need you to do some things differently." thats part of the reason why the role players look night and day difference with jimmy and wade. NOTE!!! I didn't say the only reason. but its part of the reason. and jimmy either doesn't get this. or doesn't have the balls to stand up to wade and encourage wade to modify his role because he doesn't sense the urgency. and thats in addition to bring close to nothing getting almost nothing out of the role players once rondo went down.
CJ Mcollum OTOH took it to GS, the number #1 defense in the league bar none. and thats with poor offensive fit in lillard dominating the ball.
lillard and Jimmy almost deserve each other. and for what both jimmy and lillard want to do. they are a better fit personality wise. i'd love to give them to each other. love that.
bring CJ over here who would be a young Ray allen type to pair with Rondo(a team first player and solid defender). Sign James Johnson (also a team player good defender)and Joe Ingles(very much a team player and tough nosed defender). groom Zip, grant, and Val with them and thats pretty decent team. maybe payne can be the selfish gunner off the bench? with wade?
i'm ready for a new direction.
G Buckets wrote:ChicagoStrong wrote:The NBA isn't even watchable anymore.
When it comes to postseason play.
NHL >>>> NBA

dumbell78 wrote:G Buckets wrote:ChicagoStrong wrote:The NBA isn't even watchable anymore.
When it comes to postseason play.
NHL >>>> NBA
Even the NHL has screwed it up with the seeding matchups. You have best teams playing each other in the 1st and 2nd rounds.
