3toheadmelo wrote:
Lmfaooo I’m dead
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
3toheadmelo wrote:


HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:
So in about 2 years he will become an unwanted contract after failing to take the Knicks anywhere. Sounds about right
Depends, is he going to tear his ACL like Dinwiddie, or be perpetually injured like Brogdon?
From a purely production standpoint he's nowhere close to being a contract overpay, especially compared to other PGs.
Once this new crop of young guards starts to emerge he will look like a big time overpay. He’s very average
moocow007 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:FrozenEnvelope wrote:Sign me up for Brunson, Grimes, RJ, Obi and Sims with Rose, IQ and Cam.
You have now been signed up for….Spoiler:
Hey assuming that the Knicks don't get hit by tampering charges and lose both Brunson and draft picks, he's a Knick. So cheer the poor guy on!!

DOT wrote:I like Brunson
I'm in the camp that his improvement is real and the numbers w/out Luka aren't a fluke, but would regress a bit over the course of a season
So if you think he's just a case of contract-year shenanigans, then I get not liking this move
If he keeps it up, it's a good contract. If not, it isn't. Pretty simple
My concern has always been that we're still kind of building backwards. We don't have a true franchise guy, at least I don't think anyone on this roster can develop into that. So we're kind of spending a lot of money on guys who may or may not be worth it in a vacuum, but aren't really worth it all together. I mean, if we re-sign Mitch for 4/60 as rumored and extend RJ for over 20 mil next year, that's over 110 million for our starting lineup of Brunson/Fournier/RJ/Randle/Mitch
The approach seems to be, make big signings for guys who should be improvements but aren't stars. I don't think that's ever really worked for a team with no real star before
Now, if Randle gets back to 2021 form, RJ steps up into an All Star caliber guy, and Brunson replicates his w/out Luka numbers, that's different. But that's a lot to ask
I can't help but see us treadmilling. You can take a bunch of moves which are all fine individually, but combine them and have them not work together, and I think that's what's gonna happen here
With that being said though, I am excited to have a competent PG for once. Looking forward to seeing him on court, if I still think it won't work out in the grand scheme of things.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:.HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Depends, is he going to tear his ACL like Dinwiddie, or be perpetually injured like Brogdon?
From a purely production standpoint he's nowhere close to being a contract overpay, especially compared to other PGs.
Once this new crop of young guards starts to emerge he will look like a big time overpay. He’s very average
Those new guards will end up on larger contracts, because the cap is going up.
We're in a league where Kyle Lowry makes $30 million per.
KnicksGadfly wrote:Best part of this deal is Mavs fan tears
NowWHYcee7 wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:Best part of this deal is Mavs fan tears
Why though, I always liked the Dirk mavs.
Capn'O wrote:Good player. Good start.


HarthorneWingo wrote:This is good news. But there has to be more.

HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:.HEZI wrote:
Once this new crop of young guards starts to emerge he will look like a big time overpay. He’s very average
Those new guards will end up on larger contracts, because the cap is going up.
We're in a league where Kyle Lowry makes $30 million per.
And Miami is looking to dump that salary after 1 year experiment. You are proving my point. There are bad deals in the NBA and Brunson just became one of them

Manhattan Project wrote:Damn, after seeing what Simons just went for, I might have to take back my slight overpay comment.
