GONYK wrote:j4remi wrote:GONYK wrote:IT wasn't that level of player when he signed that deal though. He was pretty much a sparkplug off the bench type like Beasley is for us.
Now that he's established himself, he can go ahead and try to gain that type of clout during his next negotiation.
Blake had a chance to have an NTC. He passed it up to get the 5th year on his deal. Now he can assess which aspect of his contract was really more valuable to him.
I'm bringing them up specifically to say "players should be pushing for NTC's more often since organizations treat them so disposably" so no disagreement here. Just not tryna hear that their salaries precludes them from wanting security in other forms.
If every player starts demanding NTC's, we'll see their salary/years come down (unless they are negotiating with Phil Jackson). I see a direct correlation.
They are getting security. They are just currently choosing financial security over geographic security.
Its not really a matter of player's choice when it comes to the NTC. There's a fairly strict criteria that a player needs to qualify for it. Just about every player that qualified, got it.
The NBA doesn't make it easy for players to have a no-trade clause included in their contracts. In order to get one, a player must have eight NBA seasons of experience and played for the team with which he is signing for at least four of them. If those conditions have been met, a no-trade clause can be negotiated into a new contract but not a contract extension. Because the circumstances required to get a no-trade clause are so specific, very few players meet the criteria.




























