BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:blueNorange wrote:BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:The union wouldn't let that fly though. It would be as big a circus as we've had here in a while....and that's saying something.
lol what is the union gonna do about it?
melo is still getting his money, the union can't tell a team who to play.

If he's healthy and ready to play but not playing that torpedoes his numbers which kills his value in free agency. Lotta relationships will suffer. He's not Starbury. Melo is still very much an NBA darling. But we need a resolution.
1. melo's value is set, he is what he is. his value doesn't diminish if you don't play him.
2. players don't run the league.
3. the front office already laid out the plan time and time and time again, and they've never mentioned melo as part of their plan so players can get butthurt but the knicks already stated their intentions of this franchise now and moving forward, and it doesn't involve melo.