This is an example of what I was referring to when I said 3 sides because I could see some large market teams be completely fine giving in to this demand where as it screws over the little markets.MickeyDavis wrote:The union wants free agency cut from 6 years to 5, a $100 reduction in revenue sharing and arbitration to include all 2 year players. I realize it's a negotiation and you aim high but if any of those actually happen it will suck.
Now taking my brewers fan goggles off I do think the current service time/arby rules do kind of screw players because teams game the system.
For all it's other issues I have to give the NFL credit for their CBA. Real revenue sharing and a hard cap are the best way for leveling the playing field for all the franchises.
I know this will upset some people but honestly one of the best ways for teams to save money and in theory reinvest is to dramatically cut back on the minor leagues. We simply don't need that many levels. Cut it way back and pay the players at those levels better. Sucks for guys chasing that dream but there would still be independent leagues and plenty of foreign leagues for guys to chase that dream. The fact teams pay 100+ basically non prospects to fill out these clubs plus the operating expenses of the clubs is wasted resources.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app