MrSparkle wrote:Thinking this over… Brooklyn has over $100M to spend, 0.1% win-(chip)-now aspirations as a young team, an incoming top-7 pick, an Australian GM (who has pursued several Aussies): Mills, Simmons, technically Kyrie… and nothing to lose. Giddey is borderline averaging a triple-double.
I think unless Nets draft a full-time playmaker (namely Harper… VJ, Kasparas to a lesser extent), I’m about 90% expecting them to make that $166M/4Y max offer to Giddey. Which wouldn’t be the end of the world to match (better than giving him the $224M/5Y extension with larger raises). But it’s starting to feel like that max offer is Giddey’s to lose. He really raised his stock last month, and I can’t think of 1 other team in the NBA as potentially interested/fitting as Brooklyn.

I doubt it. Not that Giddey wouldn’t fit with Cam Thomas and Cam Johnson - he would. But I also don’t think he would make them a top 4 team in the East. Brooklyn seems to be looking for a complete rebuild, having moved current assets for future ones. They tried to move Cam Johnson, too, but didn’t get a good enough offer. I think Brooklyn is looking for “the guy,” and while I like Giddey, I don’t view him as a legit “the guy” candidate. Don’t forget that Cam Thomas is going to get a big raise - as a guy putting up stats better than Coby’s over the course of a season, and putting up similar level stats for 2 years in a row (and two years younger than Coby).
Don’t forget that the 2nd apron really makes “bad” Max contracts hurt. A lot. Hence Brandon Ingram traded for pennies, and Zach despite rehabbing himself similarly traded for little.
I mean, who knows - they may decide that Giddey-Cam-Cam-Claxton-draft pick wing or guard plus maybe resigned Zaire Williams is the group they want to build around. But like with the Bulls, we’re talking about a group that gives you a punchers chance, at best. Bulls hopes for anything more than play in / low seed are based on Matas exploding. Meanwhile, Cam Johnson is older than Lonzo Ball…