Liver_Pooty wrote:"The minute she/someone breathes heavy I am jumping in my Lamborghini Urus and am Ghost."
LOL. Hell yeah.
This is what I want to do now. I just need the Lamborghini Urus.
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
Liver_Pooty wrote:"The minute she/someone breathes heavy I am jumping in my Lamborghini Urus and am Ghost."
LOL. Hell yeah.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
vorbis wrote:at some point the Hornets might have to make a decision about what they want to do about this situation before the league and/or legal processes have played out.
JMAC3 wrote:I am by no means an official on law, or precedent to how these have been handled in the past.
So if he pleads not guilty, I doubt the team will play him until the sentencing. So he probably misses all the games prior to the ruling and then whatever suspension NBA gives him based on verdict. (My guess, is 50 games).
My guess is Bridges, will neither accept or deny the QO while the case is open. So his rights are just in limbo until we know more information.
fatlever wrote:my guess is this is headed to trial, many months from now... or a plea deal to lesser charges, down the road, before trial
?s=20&t=bbvGJvk2LSmnyJVgd1k1Iw
I think that has to come from the leagueKEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:fatlever wrote:my guess is this is headed to trial, many months from now... or a plea deal to lesser charges, down the road, before trial
?s=20&t=bbvGJvk2LSmnyJVgd1k1Iw
Are the Hornets (the holders of his Qualifying Offer) allowed to suspend him indefinitely, or is that something that has to come from the NBA since he's a RFA?
fatlever wrote:I wish I knew more about these felony child-abuse charges. I'm curious as to why this is the first we hearing about it. I would have thought any injuries to the children that day would have been front and center in the reporting.
Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Yeah, I have that same confusion. Are they saying it is a felony because parents fighting physically in front of the children puts them in Harm's Way both physically and emotionally?JMAC3 wrote:fatlever wrote:I wish I knew more about these felony child-abuse charges. I'm curious as to why this is the first we hearing about it. I would have thought any injuries to the children that day would have been front and center in the reporting.
Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM Forums mobile app
I am unsure, reading the article Woj released it sounds like they are saying it was child abuse because the acts were committed against the mother in front of the children. It does not say he specifically if he physically injured the children.
Then goes on to have a DA say "Children who witness family violence are especially vulnerable and the impact on them is immeasurable."