Jamaaliver wrote:King Ken wrote:The Suns been absolutely horrible since. Bledsoe was right and Rich Paul once again fought for his client. Your not being sensical.
Rich Paul fought for his clients when their teams didn't want to do the client justice.
But i don't care about Rich Paul's clients.
I care about the Atlanta Hawks...and I don't want them having to deal with this guy.
NOTE: Who actually defends sports agents? I've never heard any fan spout glowing remarks on Scott Boras, Drew Rosenhaus or the like? Why the hell would a fan of a sports team be siding with the agent over the team?
1. People generally side with the player in player-v-team kerfuffles.
2. Because Klutch present themselves as ultra-aggresively(sp?) pursuing players' interests, people (incorrectly) see them as some Robin Hood-type organization. Fighting the good fight against these bad ol' GM's/teams.
3. So when Klutch makes a pubic outcry over something, many fans are like .. "Yeah, stick it to tha man!"
The reality is, Klutch exists to do the bidding of Lebron ... and obtw they're a sports agency. Outside of being Lebron's friend, they don't truly have what it takes to be a successful agency. All they do is walk into teams' offices and scream, "Gimme as much money as the CBA allows you to pay! ...... obtw, the most powerful man in basketball is backing us so you don't wanna get on his bad side, do you?"
Once the Lebron shadow fades, likely so will that agency.
All that being said, I do appreciate the fact that they are a minority-owned voice in that industry/business. It's an industry/business that suffers from a lack of diversity at the highest levels. This is also another reason folks seem to love Klutch. That said, it doesn't mean one can't evaluate what they're actually doing with a critical eye. Outside of guys that were currently teammates of lebron at the time they were negotiating, they have spectacularly failed to get anyone paid.
All in all, I love the
concept of Klutch but I do not like the execution.