ImageImageImageImageImage

Howard Thread III (Howard ready to join Lakers p.68)

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

LateRoundFlyer
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 27, 2012

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#361 » by LateRoundFlyer » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:15 pm

yows wrote:
LateRoundFlyer wrote:
The question you have to ask is: what parts change in order for a three-team deal to happen? No really, ask.

You guys say Bynum and maybe some fillers. But where do they go? ORL would still be presumably get the same package of picks and cap space as they would in a straight up deal with HOU, no? It makes absolutely no sense why they'd want us included unless they want Bynum back for themselves... but then why would HOU consent to do that trade if he is indeed their fallback option? Morey and Les would literally have nothing to show for themselves.

Let's be honest here: the whole three-team rumor was built on a flimsy notion already, and that was HOU banking on Bynum as a better bet to stay with them for the long haul. If they really are prepared to risk it all on Dwight though -- and their actions this week only intensified that belief -- what gives you all this idea that either they or ORL are going to take us along for the ride?



in my post i used the term, ruse, to bring consideration of a scenario where the published reports of proposed trade is not something that HOU intends on executing, maybe this is just posturing and leverage. it was a comment made in passing and jest because i don't know how HOU intends to leverage their risk, with the contracts they would be taking on if dwight does indeed end up a rental. If read correctly my comments poses this question.
and my reference to the 3 way is just hopeful thinking from a fan so please dont read too much into it but thanks for the critical analysis in response.


Don't worry. I'm not going out of my way to bash each and every person who has speculated on that. Believe me, I wouldn't be that bothered if what you said (and what others have said) came true. I'm pretty apathetic to both Howard and Bynum at this point, but does that mean I wouldn't feel some excitement in the future were we included in such a three-way deal? Of course not.

The main obstacle with your particular theory coming true, however, is just how much would HOU be willing to put in front of ORL just to yank back at the last minute? This is essentially what they'd be doing if it was only posturing. But over the past week, I've grown increasingly suspicious of any doublecross.

As I've said before, and you can disagree with me on this, but my understanding of Daryl Morey is that he is not one of the GMs in the West/Kupchak mold who plays his cards close to his vest. It would be an extremely unusual development, in light of his history, if any of this were misdirection, much less essentially his entire offer to Hennigan.

I suppose one could make a good argument that his job might be on the line, and he's willing to take big risks like this and use up his fellow executives' good faith. Prokhorov did this last year in the Melo sweepstakes after all. Of course, he's not really a GM, but what he did was essentially exploit Dolan and Ujiri enough to stall talks out and dramatically raise the cost of acquiring Anthony.

But if you look at HOU's moves this week, which have pretty much gutted their roster, it's hard to see how this points to such a similar move. They're preparing to amnesty Scola, they already traded Lowry and let Dragic watch, they've amassed quite a lot of cap space and draft picks. This would suggest their previous offer to ORL was not significant enough. In other words, who would invest this much risk into what would boil down to a grand prank?

I'm just not buying it here: the moves are extremely transparent, so that "reading too much into it" is pretty much impossible.
User avatar
miggs
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,688
And1: 446
Joined: May 04, 2008
Location: fear and loathing in reseda
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#362 » by miggs » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:23 pm

Interesting wiretap story of Jeremy Lin and the bid war between Knicks and Rockets

The Rockets have reportedly dropped a bombshell, dramatically increasing the third-season salary in the offer sheet signed by Jeremy Lin on Friday.

Last week, it was reported that the Rockets and Lin had agreed on an offer sheet totaling approximately $18 million guaranteed over three seasons, with a team option on the fourth and final season.

The deal was increased to $25 million total over three years, with the final season now nearly $15 million. That final season could cost the Knicks as much as $45 million in luxury tax payments. It is unclear if the fourth season's team option remains in the offer sheet.

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/22 ... z20XUlDFRx
2014: Randle / Clarkson
2015: Russell / Nance
2016: Ingram / Zubac
2017: Top 3 Pick? :nod: Fultz, Ball or Bust
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#363 » by Sofa King » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:25 pm

General manager Daryl Morey is trying to construct a trade that will allow the Rockets to take back, in addition to Howard, multiple players from a group that includes Davis, Richardson, Duhon and Hedo Turkoglu. With Scola's three remaining seasons valued at roughly $21 million off the books, Houston will have increased flexibility to help the Magic shed salary.

LINK
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#364 » by Jetset » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:26 pm

Larry Ridley ‏@mrlarryridley
Magic Source tells me Rockets/Dwight trade far from happening, and "will continue to talk to Dwight about staying" ‪#Orlando‬ ‪#Magic‬ ‪#NBA‬


And since background checks are required to post tweets now:
Larry Ridley
@mrlarryridley
Sports Director WESH-TV (NBC) Orlando, FL Big Bucks, No Whammies
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#365 » by Sofa King » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:33 pm

Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,605
And1: 12,319
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#366 » by Kilroy » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:35 pm

Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#367 » by Jetset » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:42 pm

Welp guys, I've gone full Morey mode for Sabathia. Wish me luck.
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#368 » by Sofa King » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:45 pm

destro wrote:Welp guys, I've gone full Morey mode for Sabathia. Wish me luck.

Wut?
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#369 » by Jetset » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:46 pm

huh?
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#370 » by Sofa King » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:48 pm

dunno
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#371 » by Jetset » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:50 pm

oh. alright.
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#372 » by Sofa King » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:06 pm

cool
User avatar
ennui
General Manager
Posts: 9,719
And1: 955
Joined: Feb 10, 2011
Location: I see jigaboos, I see styrofoam

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#373 » by ennui » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:07 pm

wtf guys seriously
Hunter103
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,035
And1: 94
Joined: May 11, 2006
Location: Not California :(

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#374 » by Hunter103 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:11 pm

good luck with that
Image
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#375 » by Wavy Q » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:13 pm

ok
MAMBAEMD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,038
And1: 1,714
Joined: May 16, 2007
       

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#376 » by MAMBAEMD » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:15 pm

Formerly lakerRD
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,831
And1: 4,837
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#377 » by snaquille oatmeal » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:41 pm

LateRoundFlyer wrote:You aren't saying Lakers control where Howard ends up, but yet their concerns about his back were why a deal wasn't made?

But surely, this implies if they had no problems with his back, he'd be a Laker right now right? That's in essence what you are implying, no? If not, then what? I guess I'm just having difficulty reconciling two completely contradictory statements. It truly may not be what you meant to say, but what you actually said conveys that Lakers own Howard's destiny, and if only they'd just come off their current stance thennnnn...... maybe this whole Dwightmare would be behind us already.


the problem with this kind of response is that I have to explain a previous explanation. :lol:
I never said the Lakers control where D-Ho ends up so how can that contradict my statement that "I read that the Lakers had issues with his back". if you understand the context of my post you would know it means that I thought the poster I was talking to misunderstood what I said. in other words I was saying "I didn't mean that I meant this" so how is that a contradiction? :lol:[/quote]

Well that whole roundabout is nice and all, but pretty useless considering what you posted 2 days ago:

snaquille oatmeal wrote:why are some of us still discussing this as if Orlando is the one making the call when it's the Lakers that have issues with his back? did I miss something?


So let's try this again: if ORL isn't making the call, and LA's skepticism about his back, where does that put Howard? Does it put him in control? Does it put BRK in control? HOU? ATL?

You then said and have since repeated the notion that if the Lakers trusted that Howard's back would be fine, a deal would probably be made by now. That's no misunderstanding, that is just what you said. If you "didn't mean that", then why do you keep repeating it? I mean, it's got to be driving you up a wall, right? That is, struggling to articulate such a simple point.

LateRoundFlyer wrote:
do we have official reports that the Lakers don't care about his back? or are we just assuming that the Lakers don't care and want to make a deal?


Well, no reports are technically official. I think it's best we all keep that in mind as this is playing out. But the point is moot: whether or not the Lakers care doesn't guarantee they can get a deal, nor that they are the best (or only) suitor for it. It isn't like we can't rescind the trade later, pending on the results from a comprehensive physical. ORL could very well do the same thing.

Of course, no party wants that to happen, as it would only alienate their current players even further and drive down their trade stock further, so it behooves both of them to get any concerns alleviated BEFORE a deal is reached. In that way, both ORL and LA absolutely do care about the state of their prospective players. But they also recognize the opportunity to posture, which takes far more priority than otherwise when they have a last minute pocket veto to blow the whole thing up.

[/quote]


:lol: you obviously don't understand the difference between me asking if something has changed since I last read a report or if I am stating an opinion or fact so I'll let you have this one. nice talking to you
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#378 » by Jetset » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:08 pm

Steve Kyler ‏@stevekylerNBA
Being told both Houston and Lakers still very much engaged... nothing close, but both teams working hard. Still up to Magic to deal.
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#379 » by AcecardZ » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:08 pm

desertlakerfan wrote:
Stebo_SSK wrote:@desertlakerfan Bynum was a huge reason why we won 2 rings? Seriously? This is why in 2009 in the Finals he avg 19 MPG 6ppg 4rb and .6 blks? In 2010 was injured and was pretty much a liability on the court at times and averaged 25MPG while only accounting for 7ppg and 5rebounds? Bynum was a huge reason?


2009 Bynum started every game coming back early from a injury, had he not then Pau would of been been in early foul trouble defending Howard giving us a much more difficult time winning that series.

2010 Bynum was a huge difference maker, instead of Pau getting abused at center ala 08 Finals he was allowed to play PF the majority of the game and not have to be our primary rim protection.

How about what Pau's done at center for us without Bynum? 0-1 in NBA Finals series.


You mean the Finals series we had to start Vladimir ZEROFOOTSPEED Radmanovic? You do remember he was trying to guard Paul Pierce? You do remember PP was NBA finals MVP? You do remember Trevor Ariza was just coming back from injury in 2008 and played almost no minutes in the NBA finals?

Ok enough of a condescending tone from me for one day. Steb's is 100% correct on this one. Bynum contributed a little and it was nice having him out there to start but he was far from a significant contributor in either of the most recent Laker NBA championships.
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: Howard Thread Pt. III 

Post#380 » by AcecardZ » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:20 pm

destro wrote:
Steve Kyler ‏@stevekylerNBA
Being told both Houston and Lakers still very much engaged... nothing close, but both teams working hard. Still up to Magic to deal.


The longer this takes to play out the more I'm convinced he's not going anywhere until his back is good to go and he can pass a physical. On top of that the only team I can see taking the gamble on a one year rental is the Lakers. Otherwise I don't see any team giving up any significant assets without a long term commitment from Dwight. Common sense says t's just too risky for a team like Houston to trade away their whole future for what might amount to nothing more than a one year rental.
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D

Return to Los Angeles Lakers