ImageImage

The Gordon Hayward Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,919
And1: 11,122
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#361 » by LofJ » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:25 am

MasterIchiro wrote:
LofJ wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
What do you mean by offer? Contract offer? What about sign & trade offer?


Contract offer, we can sign and trade him tonight if the Jazz were willing.


Exactly so for one whole week now this **** guy has been working on trades supposedly and he has nothing. Hayward's leaving and all we got was a blurb from Aldridge. **** pathetic.


Yeah, it's been pretty dern uneventful so far.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#362 » by DY_nasty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:25 am

the lack of faith in cho is just absurd to me. ever since he's got here, he's been arguably a top 3 GM in the league.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#363 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:26 am

Also, even if Cho were to offer an offer sheet it would tie up cap space for 3 days while the Jazz have a chance to match that we could be using on other free agents. Its smarter to just wait.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Charlotte_____
Freshman
Posts: 60
And1: 12
Joined: May 22, 2014
 

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#364 » by Charlotte_____ » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:26 am

Fred Williamson wrote:the thoughts of having the incredibly average Gordon Hayward at SG on this team (or at SF for that matter and therefore taking over MKGs spot) and paying him 16 million per year, just frightens me.

I actually rather have Stephenson. At least Stephenson has the potential to be a hit (or miss) while Hayward and his huge contract are going to make us the everlasting 4th/5th seed team.


Last season, Hayward was one of five players to average at least 15 points, five assists and five rebounds per game. The four other players were L. James $19.1M, K.Durant $17.8M, R.Westbrook $14.7M, G.Hayward $3.5M, MCW $2.2M

Hardly average, I'm assuming you've never seen him play.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#365 » by JDR720 » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:28 am

DY_nasty wrote:the lack of faith in cho is just absurd to me. ever since he's got here, he's been arguably a top 3 GM in the league.

he knows how to trade thats for sure
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#366 » by DY_nasty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:33 am

Charlotte_____ wrote:
Fred Williamson wrote:the thoughts of having the incredibly average Gordon Hayward at SG on this team (or at SF for that matter and therefore taking over MKGs spot) and paying him 16 million per year, just frightens me.

I actually rather have Stephenson. At least Stephenson has the potential to be a hit (or miss) while Hayward and his huge contract are going to make us the everlasting 4th/5th seed team.


Last season, Hayward was one of five players to average at least 15 points, five assists and five rebounds per game. The four other players were L. James $19.1M, K.Durant $17.8M, R.Westbrook $14.7M, G.Hayward $3.5M, MCW $2.2M

Hardly average, I'm assuming you've never seen him play.

I love those kinds of lists.

Because Hayward isn't as good as KD, Westbrook, or LBJ and its absolutely laughable to include him in the conversation. He isn't in the same ballpark at all.

And MCW? LOL. The Sixers went to (Please Use More Appropriate Word) 80s paced offense in an effort to inflate the stats of him and Evan Turner hoping to get something good for either of them.

Just a stupid, stupid list. Same as the Tyreke/LBJ/MJ crap.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#367 » by MasterIchiro » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:33 am

Liver_Pooty wrote:Also, even if Cho were to offer an offer sheet it would tie up cap space for 3 days while the Jazz have a chance to match that we could be using on other free agents. Its smarter to just wait.


The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole. And their other wing has made 10 three point shots in 2 years!!!! I mean. I WILL RAGE if this falls through.
It has been written...
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#368 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:36 am

MasterIchiro wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:Also, even if Cho were to offer an offer sheet it would tie up cap space for 3 days while the Jazz have a chance to match that we could be using on other free agents. Its smarter to just wait.


The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole.


Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#369 » by JDR720 » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:36 am

Liver_Pooty wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:Also, even if Cho were to offer an offer sheet it would tie up cap space for 3 days while the Jazz have a chance to match that we could be using on other free agents. Its smarter to just wait.


The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole.


Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.

Marvin. Williams.
User avatar
JDuaneWayne
Senior
Posts: 514
And1: 115
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#370 » by JDuaneWayne » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:37 am

Liver_Pooty wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:Also, even if Cho were to offer an offer sheet it would tie up cap space for 3 days while the Jazz have a chance to match that we could be using on other free agents. Its smarter to just wait.


The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole.


Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.


Somebody missed the instagram of MKG shooting in the background...
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#371 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:38 am

JDR720 wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole.


Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.

Marvin. Williams.


Don't forget Mo. Dynamic duo
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#372 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:38 am

JDuaneWayne wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
The only thing I can think of is the closer we get to July 10th, the less desperate Cho looks for a sign and trade that could occur before that point. The option to sign Hayward outright doesn't even become official until July 10th. But by the sound of the Jazz, that option, official or not official, means squat to them. They will match. I have no idea why Hayward is walking away today without a finalized sign-and-trade. You can't just pretend the Jazz don't exist here. Cho MUST have been working on a sign and trade all this time and failed to seal it during the visit. I'm being demanding on Cho but look they announced we need shooting, they failed to acquire Afflalo. They ended up not drafting Stauskas or McDermott. They lost shooting with McRoberts. They added a major risk in Hairston and still have Hendo perched atop his totem pole.


Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.


Somebody missed the instagram of MKG shooting in the background...


What about it?
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
JDuaneWayne
Senior
Posts: 514
And1: 115
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#373 » by JDuaneWayne » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:41 am

Liver_Pooty wrote:
JDuaneWayne wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:
Maybe we're interested in other targets along with Hayward? The reason why the Cavs backed out of their offer sheet is to hold out hopes of Lebron. Maybe we plan on looking into Parsons, Stephenson and others as well. Always good to keep your options open.


Somebody missed the instagram of MKG shooting in the background...


What about it?


Lol sorry LP, I totally didn't mean to quote you in that. I haven't been logged on in forever and by the time I got logged in I thought I was quoting MasterIchiro, my bad. I was being sarcastic. So much doom and gloom on here I decided to login and post, trying to make light of a situation.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#374 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:42 am

JDuaneWayne wrote:
Liver_Pooty wrote:
JDuaneWayne wrote:
Somebody missed the instagram of MKG shooting in the background...


What about it?


Lol sorry LP, I totally didn't mean to quote you in that. I haven't been logged on in forever and by the time I got logged in I thought I was quoting MasterIchiro, my bad. I was being sarcastic. So much doom and gloom on here I decided to login and post, trying to make light of a situation.


Lol. You threw me for a loop.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#375 » by DY_nasty » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:45 am

I never knew our entire offseason hinged on throwing away some of our young guys for a chance to give Gordon Hayward a max contract.
Charlotte_____
Freshman
Posts: 60
And1: 12
Joined: May 22, 2014
 

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#376 » by Charlotte_____ » Wed Jul 9, 2014 12:46 am

DY_nasty wrote:
Charlotte_____ wrote:
Fred Williamson wrote:the thoughts of having the incredibly average Gordon Hayward at SG on this team (or at SF for that matter and therefore taking over MKGs spot) and paying him 16 million per year, just frightens me.

I actually rather have Stephenson. At least Stephenson has the potential to be a hit (or miss) while Hayward and his huge contract are going to make us the everlasting 4th/5th seed team.


Last season, Hayward was one of five players to average at least 15 points, five assists and five rebounds per game. The four other players were L. James $19.1M, K.Durant $17.8M, R.Westbrook $14.7M, G.Hayward $3.5M, MCW $2.2M

Hardly average, I'm assuming you've never seen him play.

I love those kinds of lists.

Because Hayward isn't as good as KD, Westbrook, or LBJ and its absolutely laughable to include him in the conversation. He isn't in the same ballpark at all.

And MCW? LOL. The Sixers went to (Please Use More Appropriate Word) 80s paced offense in an effort to inflate the stats of him and Evan Turner hoping to get something good for either of them.

Just a stupid, stupid list. Same as the Tyreke/LBJ/MJ crap.


How is it laughable to compare them? These players put up these numbers, these are FACTS. These are not comparisons, so you have reasons behind MCW's numbers, what about Hayward's? It was known that Hayward was going to have a breakout year and he does. If he consistently puts up these numbers you can't call him average.

As for the Tyreke list, if Tyreke were to continue on his ROY level for his career this would not be an issue. But he did achieve similar numbers to LeBron, MJ, and Oscar Robertson. You can't take that away from him.
User avatar
Absinthe
Pro Prospect
Posts: 904
And1: 452
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#377 » by Absinthe » Wed Jul 9, 2014 1:05 am

DY_nasty wrote:I never knew our entire offseason hinged on throwing away some of our young guys for a chance to give Gordon Hayward a max contract.


I would trade Zeller and MKG for him in a heartbeat. I might would even throw in Biyombo too. That would give Vonleh more playing time. And Hayward would be an improvement over MKG. At least teams on the defensive end would have to try to guard the 3 for once.
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#378 » by Eoghan » Wed Jul 9, 2014 1:53 am

So let me get this straight. The Jazz have a ton of cap space and can easily give GoHay the max. So GoHay has to threaten Utah to opt out if Utah matches any offer Charlotte gives him, so that Utah listens to S&T offers.

So Utah would want some of our young guys (and picks) since those are the only ones on the roster worth anything.
Kemba: Practically untouchable and they have Burke and Exum.
Henderson: No idea why Utah would want him but Charlotte would be glad to move him, presumably.
MKG: Utah could use him, but CHA torpedoes their defense if they lose him.
Zeller: Utah has developing bigs out the ass, Favors, Kanter, and Gobert. Not many PFs though, I guess he's a candidate.
Biyombo: Utah has Favors, Kanter, and Gobert. They shouldn't want him plus we need our backup C.
Vonleh: Rookies very rarely get traded so soon.
Hairston: Not Mormon material.
Taylor: Would be filler but I can see him going.
Neal: Expiring filler, helps them meet salary floor.

So, uh, yeah. Hayward for Hendo, Zeller + filler and future 1st rounder or something. Not exactly a haul for Utah and really kind of lame for CHA to be ponying up so much for a guy that shares a name with The Humble One.

I just don't see why we're good trade partners.
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#379 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Wed Jul 9, 2014 2:20 am

It would be interesting to offer a 4 contract with a player option after the fist year. If the Jazz match he gets paid and can still opt out after a year.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,761
And1: 10,091
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: The Gordon Hayward Thread 

Post#380 » by amcoolio » Wed Jul 9, 2014 4:02 am

Just say no to guards with the initials "GH".

Just sign Lance and ship Henderson for whatever you can if Hendo doesn't want to come off the bench. There is so much potential growth left for Kemba, Lance, MKG, Zeller, Vonleh, and Biz, and maybe even Hairston. Why give up assets like that for a guy like Hayward? Can you imagine if just three of that six took their game to the next level? I mean what if Zeller, MKG, and Vonleh turn out to be all-stars? Of the six only Kemba is closest to being what he can in his prime, but even Kemba has a chance to Tony Parker-fy his game and be a great starter on a contender.

Return to Charlotte Hornets