Did OKC make the right decision with Harden?

Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

User avatar
dyukcs
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,097
And1: 493
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#41 » by dyukcs » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:00 am

SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing


He was before he started **** everyone's sisters and mothers, Darko's a bad bad man.
kdthunderup
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 562
Joined: May 13, 2011
 

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#42 » by kdthunderup » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:01 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:Of course they made the wrong decision. They gave up Harden for essentially nothing and instead kept the far inferior Westbrook. The fact that Durant is so good that the team is still elite despite making the worse error since Darko over Wade doesn't change the reality that they blew an opportunity to have a GOAT level team in OKC.

Uh no Westbrook is a far better player then Harden. Harden doesn't play any defense and not doesn't play at the same level of intensity as Westbrook which helps us greatly. Plus Westbrook has a better attitude which fits the culture at OKC.
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 649
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#43 » by Frank Mulely » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:01 am

SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing


Nobody really had seen Darko play in 03 whereas Wade was a blue-chipper to anybody who had watched him work. I remember him being compared to Jordan during the Final Four. The real question is why most GMs are such sheep and always draft the conventional wisdom and let obvious studs like Wade fall in the lottery....which brings us to Presti who is one of the GMs none of us on this board can even pretend we could out-draft. His slick drafting might save the Harden dump from being viewed as an all-time idiotic decision. I think the pieces they have now can win a ring. It's a nice supporting cast around KD and Westbrook.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
User avatar
Rhinou
Junior
Posts: 307
And1: 299
Joined: Sep 12, 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK
   

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#44 » by Rhinou » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:03 am

SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing

Because the guy that said that is a troll and makes ludicrous statements continually for attention.
MalonesElbows wrote:No team giving Enes Kanter significant minutes will make it out of the second round, can take that to the bank.
mojay641
Banned User
Posts: 591
And1: 205
Joined: Aug 20, 2013

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#45 » by mojay641 » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:09 am

how is harden far superior to westbrook?
jym85
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,685
And1: 649
Joined: Jan 26, 2010

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#46 » by jym85 » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:25 am

They should have kept him that extra year and made the decision the next summer
User avatar
TheBargnaniRule
Junior
Posts: 495
And1: 438
Joined: Dec 25, 2012

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#47 » by TheBargnaniRule » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:31 am

Styrian wrote:Obviously not, Thunder would already have 4 championships and would go 82-0 if they kept Harden.
Image

Thanks to TZ for the sig
User avatar
SargentBargs101
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,961
And1: 307
Joined: Apr 05, 2010

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#48 » by SargentBargs101 » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:44 am

Frank Mulely wrote:
SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing


Nobody really had seen Darko play in 03 whereas Wade was a blue-chipper to anybody who had watched him work. I remember him being compared to Jordan during the Final Four. The real question is why most GMs are such sheep and always draft the conventional wisdom and let obvious studs like Wade fall in the lottery....which brings us to Presti who is one of the GMs none of us on this board can even pretend we could out-draft. His slick drafting might save the Harden dump from being viewed as an all-time idiotic decision. I think the pieces they have now can win a ring. It's a nice supporting cast around KD and Westbrook.

But heres my question basing this off all the reports written about him prior to the draft,did the pistons really make a mistake on drafting a 17 year 7'0 big by all reports could do it all offensively passing, shooting, dribbling and defend? I will say at that point GM's were all tryna find the next international star i.e (dirk, yao) plus the pistons needed a big ( teaching us all a lesson in years later to pick based on BPA not need). Also there were things there about wade not to like... Having his meniscus removed, being undersize, upside he was like 22/23 when he came out etc.

I think everyone can agree the Harden trade was beyond horrible but i will say this presti has made up for it with drafting Adams, jackson/lamb development. Lets see how things play out the next two to three years...
Image
" Best case scenario Gordan Hayward becomes like Adam Morrison."
User avatar
SargentBargs101
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,961
And1: 307
Joined: Apr 05, 2010

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#49 » by SargentBargs101 » Mon Dec 2, 2013 7:54 am

jym85 wrote:They should have kept him that extra year and made the decision the next summer

Even the trade deadline some team might have panicked and overpay.
Image
" Best case scenario Gordan Hayward becomes like Adam Morrison."
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#50 » by Kabookalu » Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:52 am

I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.

No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.

There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.
Read on Twitter
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#51 » by BrooklynBulls » Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:55 am

Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.

No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.

There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.


Everything you said is correct, which is why they should have kept Harden, amnestied Perkins, and traded Ibaka for a Center.
jeremylin17
Sophomore
Posts: 196
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 08, 2012

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#52 » by jeremylin17 » Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:58 am

luckily you guys were not the GM or OKC would be stucked as Miamis bitch had they stuck with harden.
Chalky White
Banned User
Posts: 862
And1: 154
Joined: Jan 01, 2013

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#53 » by Chalky White » Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:59 am

BrooklynBulls wrote:
Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.

No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.

There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.


Everything you said is correct, which is why they should have kept Harden, amnestied Perkins, and traded Ibaka for a Center.



And the Bulls should have selected Russell Westbrook over Derrick Rose. But then, they do say hindsight is 20/20.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#54 » by BrooklynBulls » Mon Dec 2, 2013 9:00 am

Chalky White wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:
Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.

No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.

There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.


Everything you said is correct, which is why they should have kept Harden, amnestied Perkins, and traded Ibaka for a Center.



And the Bulls should have selected Russell Westbrook over Derrick Rose. But then, they do say hindsight is 20/20.


Because Russell Westbrook would really have helped in the previous years playoffs. If you're done making completely irrelevant attacks, it may interest you to know that this was ALWAYS my opinion. Probably since the beginning of Harden's 3rd year when he made the leap, but definitely by the end of it.
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: Did OKC make the right decision with Harden? 

Post#55 » by kingkirk » Mon Dec 2, 2013 9:24 am

This topic is becoming nauseating. I've locked at least 12 of them. This will be 13.

It's been done and is only now relevant if users want to bait each other. That's all it serves at this point.

Return to The General Board