Gooner wrote:JoseRizal wrote:And they say Kyrie was the main problem...
Kyrie wasn't a good leader, but even if he was, I doubt it would have changed anything. There was juts too many egos there, too many immature players, and there was a coach who couldn't handle it at all, and only contrubuted to it by accomodating Hayward too much. Kyrie was the most obvious problem, but he wasn't the main one.
Accomodating Hayward, i hate this narrative. The rest of your statement is fine.
Yes Stevens tried to force Hayward back into the starting role, but that was for exactly 16 games at the start of the season. Thats roughly one fifth of the season, afterwards he was relegated to the bench. If the other players (and some voiced this publicly) felt Hayward hasn't earned the starting spot, they were correct. But they should have gotten their own mindset in order once Stevens pulled the plug on Hayward starting. What happend the rest of the season, the other 70 games? Yes Stevens made the mistake by giving Hayward to much time early on, but he corrected it and the chemestry was still dogs**t for the rest of the season.
The one to blame for most Bostons failure last season is Ainge. He built the roster and knew that 4 of the top 8 rotation players were in contract years. Why would go into the season with so much money on the line. And why didnt't he traded someone at the deadline when the chemestry was obivously (for everyone) horrible. All four are gone now.































