WarriorGM wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
There wasn't any decent data in this thread when that was posted, actually provoking people to lift their game is necessary sometimes.
And the average person is influenced by the marketed narrative. If I want to have a good understanding of a topic I'm not asking the average population that has seen snippets of info on the topic, I'm asking people who have written extensively on the topic. In this case the topic is ranking players and you want find any better expertise than those on the PC board completing ranking projects over there. They've been doing it for years.
When people post stuff like this
BPM
Jordan 9.21
James 8.76
You guys just ignore data like this and other metrics/achievements. There is a ton of stuff posted favoring Jordan over James but you always say “PC board” bro give it a break. Of course there is some data backing James. But there is a ton of data backing Jordan too. Why is the data favoring James more meaningful than the data backing Jordan? And dont tell people that they cant remember how great Jordan was with the Bulls. Why does this bother you so much lol? James had a chance at a 3 peat and he blew it. Jordan did this twice in the 90s..
Start enumerating all the numbers in favor of Curry over on the PC board and feel the temperature drop. They cannot exactly argue against the facts so they'll just censor instead. That's why it's an echo chamber over there. No one should be citing that groupthink forum except as an example of navel gazing on the internet.
Really? What I think happened is that the "numbers" people push for Steph turned out to strongly favor Lebron:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=106319069#p106319069
The "numbers" people are posting for Jordan are box-score aggregates with arbitrary weightings that only track the ends of possessions.
Here's the thing. If we shift the weightings...
https://web.archive.org/web/20150206043605/http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com/ratings/1996.html
(Jordan not top 3!!!!)
What ceiling raising is asking for is presumably data that ties to "making teams win more", and there, Jordan looks more like a peer of Magic and Hakeem than a big era-outlier:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=107218620#p107218620
In some ways he stands out more during the second-three peat than his supposed "peak" which makes the --assumption-- that something like RAPM would prefer him during the first-three peat somewhat questionable,










