I like it Saric as 36 haha.
36 was the first number of any kind I got on the back of a sporting jersey when I was a little one, a Mr Saverio Rocca (who later went on to be an NFL punter).

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
zimpy27 wrote:I'd like to see the starting lineup as Rose, Okogie, Covington, Saric, KAT
Neeva wrote:We can’t bench wiggins need him to up his value with Butler gone.
Dewey wrote:Neeva wrote:We can’t bench wiggins need him to up his value with Butler gone.
or risk having him totally destroy it? I maybe wouldnt do it right out of the gate post-butler trade, but like the concept...
Neeva wrote:Dewey wrote:Neeva wrote:We can’t bench wiggins need him to up his value with Butler gone.
or risk having him totally destroy it? I maybe wouldnt do it right out of the gate post-butler trade, but like the concept...
What? His numbers have been way better when butler didn’t play, up his value, then hopefully we end up with reddish and we can try to unload wiggins contract and get something positive back..
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
“I think MIN should have taken Richardson and a 1st!” Or “I think MIN should have taken four 1sts from HOU!”
“MIN really needed the awful multi-year contracts of Dion Waiters or Brandon Knight rammed down their throats!”
. Or ...“The PHI offer didn’t have any multi-year bad money!”
“the 2022 second rounder, the higher of the DEN or PHI pick” could be in the year that the NBA first allows high schoolers, doubling the talent - that pick could be worth more than a late 2019 1st, with Jimmy, from HOU or MIA.”
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
AirP. wrote:Don't think I've seen this one anywhere...
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
KGdaBom wrote:I liked RoCo's #33. I know some of the Wolves #s, but don't recall who's wearing #33 if anybody is.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom wrote:derek360 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:What Wiggins or Towns should or shouldn't do has nothing to do with what is likely for Covington. As for us getting Draft picks that may or may not be better than Saric or Covington I was talking about picks acquired by trading Butler. Not picks that we may acquire by tanking.
I just overreacted to the "should" and "likely" in your comment...With the current system the way it is, I don't think Covington can sustain his current production especially on a team that plays little to no team defense on a consistent basis. Covington is by far the Wolves best defender now and his presence might not raise the play of WIggins or Towns (You would expect it to but if Butler couldn't do it...)
What Wiggins and Towns should have a huge impact on what Covington does. If Wiggins and Towns actually play to their potential and that contract (I know that is unrealistic, but at least raise their level of play significantly from what it is now and do it consistently), that should make Covington into an even better player. Same with Saric.
Fair enough, but these people who want to go into full tank mode on the chance we get a draft pick that turns out good sickens me. We got two players who are quite good and should be good for a long time to come.
AirP. wrote:Don't think I've seen this one anywhere(on this board)...
Klomp wrote:KGdaBom wrote:I liked RoCo's #33. I know some of the Wolves #s, but don't recall who's wearing #33 if anybody is.
KBD has 33
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:
upriser7 wrote:Klomp wrote:
damn...I will try to be there....Target Center is just beside the building where I work
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
AirP. wrote:
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves