Chanel Bomber wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Barrett has a negative impact on winning overall, primarily because he doesn't defend.
Neither Barrett nor Hunter can turn a bad team into a good one. Neither's a significant player but I'd take Hunter over Barrett on a good team every time. At least he won't focus on hijacking the offense to put up numbers at the expense of the team and ignore defense entirely.
The primary reason we lost the Miami series was RJ's total lack of defense. The numbers are staggering and bear it out.
I still think that’s underrating Barrett.
Defensive rating is a terrible stat anyway, but they’re both at 117. (OG 112 though, with Randle at 110, Towns at 108… shows you how misleading stats can be)
DFG%, however: Hunter 51%, RJ 46% …
Granted, Hunter is the better shooter, but Barrett is the better player.
I didn't use defensive rating.
DFG% isn't indicative of defense as it only covers a minuscule proportion of defensive possessions played. Defenders contest a shot at the end of only 5-10% of the defensive possessions they play. DFG% doesn't account for team defense (i.e. help defense, transition defense, rotations etc.) which accounts for a much larger portion of individual defensive performance.
RJ is one of the worst wing defenders in the entire NBA. Hunter is not.
No, but I had brought up defensive rating in a related post. Either way, this is interesting to an extent, but after all you’re betting on a horse here that doesn’t have any record of being any good either. They’re both incomplete, lackadaisical players, very similar in what they’re usually criticized for, however, people have been a lot more frustrated with Hunter’s development.
Personally, I’ve been intrigued by him ever since he entered the league, but after all, he cannot even make it into their mediocre starting lineup. He is the better shooter out of the two, but he wouldn’t win Toronto any games either, especially not defensively or with intangibles. Overall, RJ already is the much more polished and versatile player.