bballcool34 wrote:jfs1000d wrote:canman1971 wrote:Jesus, if Winslow was such a sure thing he probably doesn't make it to 10. Yes, there are cases of Dirk, PP, etc... but look at reality. More guys who drop fail.
Gotta agree with canman. I would want Winslow, but Miami is going to struggle anyway. The guy I would have liked is Okafor.
As far as assets. The problem with all these assets is people don't like to make trades when the guy could pay more. It's like, well, "you can afford it" syndrome.
Other GMs know we can offer more, so our price is higher. The fact the Hornets went and got Kaminsky, ridiculous. They could have traded down and got him or could have got KO and No. 16 for Kaminsky.
That's not how it works generally in a rational negotiation. If you value the assets being offered more than your own, even if the other person can offer more, you'd still accept the offer if it's firmly better in your mind. What does this tell us?
a) Danny didn't value Winslow enough to offer enough to get him
or
b) we didn't have the assets to move up
It has to be A. We had plenty of assets to move from 16 to 9. If we thought he was an all-star, fine.
What we also have learned is that the Lakers are out of Boogie Cousins derby. They don't have an asset to trade. I think that's a deal we make sometime next month. We are holding these picks for trades. Not rookies.
Too bad. I wanted Okafor.