ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

bsilver
Rookie
Posts: 1,104
And1: 593
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: New Haven, CT

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#681 » by bsilver » Mon Jan 30, 2017 5:57 pm

pineappleheadindc wrote:
nate33 wrote:
pineappleheadindc wrote:I see that customs personnel at airports refused to comply with judicial cease-and-desist orders. That's executive branch personnel not adhering to judicial branch legal declarations.

Book this: On January 29, 2017 -- I'm calling that Trump will be impeached before his first term over.

More importantly, it will be Congressional *Republicans* who will lead the impeachment proceedings (all to save their brand).

Never gonna happen. Or it certainly won't happen unless there's a massive landslide win for Democrats in 2018, giving them both houses.

Republican congressmen are trying to win the votes of Republicans, not Democrats. How is impeaching Trump going to help Republican congressmen win votes?



Mr. Chairman, I'd like to extend and revise my remarks. Here is my thinking:

1. Congressional Republicans don't care about Trump, they care about maintaining Republican control of Congress.
2. Trump and Bannon are not helping themselves. It's only been a little over a week and they're sinking in polls, kinds screwing up simple things like Executive Orders and them being vetted by (their own) executive branch agencies.
3. At some point, Trump and crew are gonna hit a mark where their relative unpopularity will risk mid-term election results. Their "brand" is gonna be toxic. That's when, in self-preservation mode, Congressional Republicans are gonna act.
4. They have Mike Pence teed up. I think Congressional Republicans would prefer to work with him. He's conservative and one of them, but not unpredictable like Trump. So if they dump Trump, they can look like they're willing to look after the American people against an unpopular President, but still line up a President who'll back their agenda. Win-win.
5. I see that Customs agents did not fully comply with court orders freezing deportations as part of the recent immigration Executive order. That's a Constitutional conflict. Republicans will take advantage of Trump continued overreaching when they need to, dump him to show the American people just how nonpartisan they are, and tee up Pence, who'll back their agenda while not having the patina of Trump on him.

Customs agents not following court orders is not likely enough to talk about impeachment. There needs more of a "smoking gun" such as evidence that Trump is giving the orders. Haven't seen that so far, but he can't keep his mouth shut, so he may implicate himself. If that happens, there are grounds for impeachment. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” When the courts give an order, it should be based on some existing law, or the Constitution itself, so their order is basically saying the law is being violated, and it must stop.

Of course court orders can be appealed, so it can be a long process before the Supreme Court rules. Assuming appeals to the current court orders, any plans for impeachment would have to wait for a Supreme Court decision.

Impeachment requires the commission of treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors. Disobeying court orders may fit under "high crimes and misdemeanors", but this is probably a moot point since there's not a definition in the Constitution. Congress can do what they want. The bar is not high. Clinton was impeached by the House for his lies about sex.

I think the last thing Democrats want is for Trump to be impeached. Especially before the 2018 mid-term elections. Democrats suffer from low turnout in the mid-terms, so desparately need a lightening rod like Trump to still be in office.

Republican legislators would love to see him gone, but couldn't take the risk of starting impeachment proceedings. Trump supporters would definitely take out their wrath on Republican candidates. Doesn't look like there's much chance of impeachment.
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics — quote popularized by Mark Twain.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,213
And1: 20,633
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#682 » by dckingsfan » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:22 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:WSJ blames everything on liberals?!?!?! I'm SHOCKED

True. And the NY Times blames everything on conservatives. And they both missed the point, shocking!!! Neither were for Trump or predicted this. Hence my comment - The Fourth Estate is in shambles.

WELCOME BACK ZONK!!!
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#683 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:44 pm

nate33 wrote:This is why Pine's prediction of impeachment will not come to pass.

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.

Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.
The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.

http://www.infowars.com/rasmussen-poll-clear-majority-of-americans-support-trumps-travel-ban/

You can bet that, among Republicans only, support is probably closer to 90%.


Rasmussen and Info Wars in the same post. Can't make this stuff up
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,167
And1: 5,012
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#684 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:48 pm

nate33 wrote:This is why Pine's prediction of impeachment will not come to pass.

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.

Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.
The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.

http://www.infowars.com/rasmussen-poll-clear-majority-of-americans-support-trumps-travel-ban/

You can bet that, among Republicans only, support is probably closer to 90%.


Rasmussen polls are notorious for having a right-leaning bias.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#685 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:49 pm

Current top story on Info Wars:

BREAKING: CATHOLICS TURN AGAINST SATANIC POPE FRANCIS

lol at anyone who ever posts anything from that site - you're literally just posting random fiction
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#686 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:52 pm

gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:This is why Pine's prediction of impeachment will not come to pass.

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.

Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.
The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.

http://www.infowars.com/rasmussen-poll-clear-majority-of-americans-support-trumps-travel-ban/

You can bet that, among Republicans only, support is probably closer to 90%.


Rasmussen and Info Wars in the same post. Can't make this stuff up

You realize you are criticizing the most accurate poll in the 2016 election, right?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#687 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:53 pm

gtn130 wrote:Current top story on Info Wars:

BREAKING: CATHOLICS TURN AGAINST SATANIC POPE FRANCIS

lol at anyone who ever posts anything from that site - you're literally just posting random fiction

Are you suggesting that Infowars made up the Rasmussen polling results?
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#688 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm

nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:Current top story on Info Wars:

BREAKING: CATHOLICS TURN AGAINST SATANIC POPE FRANCIS

lol at anyone who ever posts anything from that site - you're literally just posting random fiction

Are you suggesting that Infowars made up the Rasmussen polling results?


I'm suggesting you reading Info Wars disqualifies you from having an informed opinion.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#689 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:57 pm

Nate, do you believe Catholics are turning against Satanic Pope Francis?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#690 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:58 pm

gtn130 wrote:Nate, do you believe Catholics are turning against Satanic Pope Francis?

There's a difference between first hand reporting and merely noting the fact that a poll exists. Can you not comprehend this?
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#691 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:01 pm

nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:Nate, do you believe Catholics are turning against Satanic Pope Francis?

There's a difference between first hand reporting and merely noting the fact that a poll exists. Can you not comprehend this?


Yeah, but what you don't seem to understand is that when it's made apparent that you read propaganda like Info Wars, nobody can take you seriously.

It's like Induveca and his brave proclamation that he sides with Wikileaks over the IC. You lose all credibility as an objective and rational person when you do something like that.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#692 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:08 pm

gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:Nate, do you believe Catholics are turning against Satanic Pope Francis?

There's a difference between first hand reporting and merely noting the fact that a poll exists. Can you not comprehend this?


Yeah, but what you don't seem to understand is that when it's made apparent that you read propaganda like Info Wars, nobody can take you seriously.

It's like Induveca and his brave proclamation that he sides with Wikileaks over the IC. You lose all credibility as an objective and rational person when you do something like that.

Can't argue with the facts so attack the source. Typical.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#693 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:09 pm

DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:This is why Pine's prediction of impeachment will not come to pass.

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.

Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.
The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.

http://www.infowars.com/rasmussen-poll-clear-majority-of-americans-support-trumps-travel-ban/

You can bet that, among Republicans only, support is probably closer to 90%.


Rasmussen polls are notorious for having a right-leaning bias.

Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in the 2016 election. It would be more accurate to say that everybody else (except IBD) had a left wing bias.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#694 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:11 pm

nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:There's a difference between first hand reporting and merely noting the fact that a poll exists. Can you not comprehend this?


Yeah, but what you don't seem to understand is that when it's made apparent that you read propaganda like Info Wars, nobody can take you seriously.

It's like Induveca and his brave proclamation that he sides with Wikileaks over the IC. You lose all credibility as an objective and rational person when you do something like that.

Can't argue with the facts so attack the source. Typical.


I'm not even making an argument about whatever poll you're citing. I'm simply pointing out that Info Wars is not something that should be read by any objective and rational human being.

You don't seem willing to address that, though.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#695 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:13 pm

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:This is why Pine's prediction of impeachment will not come to pass.


http://www.infowars.com/rasmussen-poll-clear-majority-of-americans-support-trumps-travel-ban/

You can bet that, among Republicans only, support is probably closer to 90%.


Rasmussen polls are notorious for having a right-leaning bias.

Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in the 2016 election. It would be more accurate to say that everybody else (except IBD) had a left wing bias.


loooooooool

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

Come on, dude, you don't believe this stuff.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#696 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:14 pm

gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
Rasmussen polls are notorious for having a right-leaning bias.

Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in the 2016 election. It would be more accurate to say that everybody else (except IBD) had a left wing bias.


loooooooool

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

Come on, dude, you don't believe this stuff.

That's pre 2016 election, XXX.

edited. I shouldn't have used a personal insult.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#697 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:16 pm

nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in the 2016 election. It would be more accurate to say that everybody else (except IBD) had a left wing bias.


loooooooool

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

Come on, dude, you don't believe this stuff.

That's pre 2016 election, XXX.

edited. I shouldn't have used a personal insult..


So we're discarding it because of your one single data point?
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,068
And1: 9,442
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#698 » by I_Like_Dirt » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:17 pm

gtn... :nonono:

That whole "I'll find one thing to use to discredit absolutely everything of something I don't want to hear and then shout it down" is the worst thing that's happened to modern political discourse. I get that the attitude is everywhere and it's largely a by-product of the internet where mob mentality rules and chirpy one-liners are ever-changing head of mob mentality, but...

If you want to discredit infowars, I can understand. Frankly, I don't exactly find them to be particularly credible for a host of reasons.

If you want to discredit the poll, sure, but that's a different issue from infowars specifically, and it's probably better to do that with a bit of reason rather than trying to find a single issue to discredit things.

If you disagree with nate, I'd suggest that's probably a good thing politically speaking, but to try to latch on to a single thing to discredit him isn't particularly useful. The whole concept of grooming a mob mentality through ridicule and blame and then guiding it somehow is dangerous, and frankly, on both sides of the floor is arguably the biggest reason for the political reality we see today.
Bucket! Bucket!
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#699 » by gtn130 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:17 pm

and lol at calling me an idiot. Nate is mad I guess. Quite the mod
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,614
And1: 23,082
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#700 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:22 pm

gtn130 wrote:and lol at calling me an idiot. Nate is mad I guess. Quite the mod

After calling me incapable of having an informed opinion, not rational, and not credible, I figured you could take it. Guess I was wrong.

Return to Washington Wizards