Post#710 » by MrSparkle » Sat Jun 22, 2024 6:51 pm
I like that AK added the 3rd "passer" to the Bulls since 1998... (Rondo, Lonzo, now Giddey)... That's been a long missed aspect of the Bulls. We once had a beautiful passing team: Pippen, Kukoc and Jordan had excellent vision (besides their scoring ability and defense). Honorable mentions for Noah and Brad Miller, although IMO they were good at the fundamental passes, but not some kind of exquisite playmakers. Lonzo was a breathe of fresh air. But it's crazy how Bulls management has mostly avoided pursuing any 3-eyed passers in the last 25 years. Rondo was a past-prime desperation pickup (on the wrong build/team), and Lonzo was just way too short-lived. So here's to hoping Josh can grow his triple-double resume.
My disappointment in the trade was the differential in value. No doubt, a much worse scenario would've been holding Caruso to the deadline and trying to fish for a pick for a 2 month rental (or the risk of him getting injured again), or resigning him when we have no business resigning him. I just feel like AK took the OKC offer ASAP without negotiating. I suppose he's in no position to negotiate, cause he put himself in this dead-end by holding past the last 2 deadlines and summers with his higher-value assets.
At this point, I do think it's imperative that Demar moves on. I really don't want this trade to be another "assist for Vucevic." Although if we're a complete tank job, which I hope we will be, but I know we won't be with Billy and Arturas, then Vuc/Giddey are your commanders. The team will be carved up on D. But if you have Demar, it's just going to be another awkward year of having 1 good 3P shooter on the floor (with 3-4 bad defenders) in a league where good teams have 4-5 good defenders and 4-5 good 3P shooters. But the Bulls will find a way to beat bottom-10 teams and deliver a pick to SAS.
So here's to hoping we don't get Barnes, Bogdanovic/Capela or Ingram for Zach (or Demar). If they could work out a more rational extension for Ingram (not $50M: jesus), and Demar is out, then I'm more OK with a Giddey/Ingram/Coby concept then nothing. But I'd ideally keep the Flag/2025 top-8 pursuit in mind. If you give Giddey, Coby and Pat the keys, you're not winning more than 30 games. If you really give Giddey and Pat the keys (and Dalen Terry, and this #11/or whoever), we could have a productive developmental year, and receive a well-deserved tank pick.
But we'll see. I have a hard time imagining them letting Demar walk for nothing.
Other thing I do like about the trade, is we got taller. Honestly, I've been sick of Bulls small ball since 2006. It just doesn't reap the results you want in basketball, even if the defensive stats pop out or the hustle looks good. I don't mean plodding PFs and Cs, but you just need your wings to be 6'6-6'9, and your bigs to be either heavy and athletic or 7ft+ to raise the floor and ceiling of the team. Putting a 6'4 guard on PFs out of desperation is just preposterous, and I loved that Caruso could do that, but to use that scheme (even if spot-minutes) over the course of 3 years? Absolutely nonsensical. The play-in bounces reflect that. Any team with 2+ star-caliber scorers and all-defensive players shouldn't be losing play-ins.