pineappleheadindc wrote:In my office, it was really split 50-50.
One thing though, there were no minor opinions. Everyone either really liked them or really hated them.
As I said above, I was 50-50 on the uni as well. So was the Under Armor CEO, apparently.
I heard on Scott Van Pelt's ESPN Radio Show today an interview with the Under Armor CEO. The guy is a UMCP alum (as is Van Pelt). From his interview he indicated regardless of the chatter the team spoke for itself. There would be a different dialogue going on entirely about the uniforms had the Terps lost. Good thing Maryland won if you're a Terp fan!
His sentiments echoed what Coach Edsall said after the game, that the uniform was about pride in the state of Maryland toward Maryland athletics. The CEO seemed to almost admit without saying it that the uniforms weren't too popular. However, he mentioned the main thing is that Under Armor is very popular with 17-18 year old kids.
The bottom line about those uniforms IMO is that they won't trot that particular special addition out again IMO as it will probably be unpopular with potential recruits. That said, I hope the turtle shell helmet gets scrapped too.


















