LuessiT wrote:The more film I'm watching, I kinda dig Lonnie Walker at our range.
He's certainly talented. Has a similar profile to Mitchell in a lot of ways.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
LuessiT wrote:The more film I'm watching, I kinda dig Lonnie Walker at our range.

bizarro wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Matches Malone wrote:Could we move up a couple spots if we packaged #17 with Bledsoe?
Cavs for #8 in a last ditch effort to keep Lebron still seems possible.
It’s too early in the day out here for spontaneous erections! Don’t do this to me!!
Ruzious wrote:bizarro wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:
Cavs for #8 in a last ditch effort to keep Lebron still seems possible.
It’s too early in the day out here for spontaneous erections! Don’t do this to me!!
I can't see it happen (the trade, that is...). The Cavs would have to increase their lux tax by several zillion dollars for a guard who can't hit jumpers. And for that honor, they get to draft lower.
emunney wrote:LuessiT wrote:The more film I'm watching, I kinda dig Lonnie Walker at our range.
He's certainly talented. Has a similar profile to Mitchell in a lot of ways.
nmeurett wrote:If Bamba was there I'd be all over this.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
emunney wrote:LuessiT wrote:The more film I'm watching, I kinda dig Lonnie Walker at our range.
He's certainly talented. Has a similar profile to Mitchell in a lot of ways.
Ruzious wrote:bizarro wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:
Cavs for #8 in a last ditch effort to keep Lebron still seems possible.
It’s too early in the day out here for spontaneous erections! Don’t do this to me!!
I can't see it happen (the trade, that is...). The Cavs would have to increase their lux tax by several zillion dollars for a guard who can't hit jumpers. And for that honor, they get to draft lower.
The problem is that Middleton and Parker are too much alike. Need help else where. Middleton has better value.bucksfansince88 wrote:I wouldn’t give up Middleton for a big
Ron Swanson wrote:You'd obviously be getting back a junk contract to make salaries work (they'd try to include Tristan but I'd counter with JR), so I don't see why the Cavs wouldn't possibly go for something like Bledsoe + #17 for JR + #8 if they don't really love anyone at #8.
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
They should have been working threw the draft the whole time. Not picking up trash threw Free Agency.xTitan wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:You'd obviously be getting back a junk contract to make salaries work (they'd try to include Tristan but I'd counter with JR), so I don't see why the Cavs wouldn't possibly go for something like Bledsoe + #17 for JR + #8 if they don't really love anyone at #8.
Bucks do not want draft picks, looking to build around Giannis now......I would be surprised if they don't trade their current pick
TroyD92 wrote:People are forgetting how awful PG was before the Bledsoe trade I see.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
blazza18 wrote:TroyD92 wrote:People are forgetting how awful PG was before the Bledsoe trade I see.
Brogdon and the starters was not terrible from what I remember.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
bizarro wrote:blazza18 wrote:TroyD92 wrote:People are forgetting how awful PG was before the Bledsoe trade I see.
Brogdon and the starters was not terrible from what I remember.
You're right. And, if the proposition is we're forgetting (which we aren't) then the proposition must also be Bledsoe was a good PG? My response to this is:
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
bucksfansince88 wrote:I wouldn’t give up Middleton for a big