ImageImageImageImageImage

Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade)

Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36

kane2021
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,005
And1: 6,067
Joined: Oct 03, 2008
Location: It's OK to feel that way. Just sick of hearing about it all the time.

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#91 » by kane2021 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:22 pm

The team that will strike out will be the nets. I can see mid level 2nd tier FA's using them as bargaining against the teams that hold there rights as the dust settles. There is more cap space out there than top players this off season.

The thing is this. The Knicks and heat are looking to rebuild there teams. The Bulls are hoping for the big fish or will plug in around what they have.

The nets are rebuilding the franchise. New coach, new owner, GM stepped down, trying to move. This is a 3-5 year process. Worst off is they have lifted the house off the foundation and have to place to stick they shovel.

That team has never gotten any support. That building is always empty. I just dont see how a top FA would want to spend 3/5th's to the entire duration of there contract waiting for the nets to land on there feet. Its bad business.
Image

Never underestimate the strength of knowledge.

Bring back the physical game and send the softies home.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#92 » by moocow007 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:22 pm

nyqua11 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:Then he's done a terrible job worrying about his team. What he should be doing is pursuing every option possible in moving Arenas to Orlando for anything (even Rashard Lewis). THAT is what he needed the most to do...to get Arenas the heck out of there and away from Wall while adding someone that doesn't make more (and right now NO ONE IN THE NBA makes more than Arenas) and who can actually contribute. He didn't need to get a "good guy" to "tutor" Wall (as was supposedly the justification for Hinrich)...honestly does anyone really actually and honestly believe that Wall believes he needs anyone to "mentor" him? And Yi? Wow that's a terrible trade. Yi stinks (he does) and he's a puss (he is). Why would you want a guy who shrivels at the first sign of pressure on your team? To show the other players that they too can go into a shell at the first sign of trouble?

Deals like this has happened before. In NY. Starting roughly 5 years ago. Get the best talent, regardless of need, fit, salary or bargaining power. Honestly, looks like Ernie is trying to challenge Kublai Kahn for worst GM in the NBA right now.


I assume he is trying to move Arenas, then he can plug Hinrich into the SG spot or have him backup both positions. And he can trade Hinrich in the future for future picks to a contending team this year or next year. And Wall is 19/20 years old. Lots of young players aren't ready for the NBA and Hinrich can help him cope and deal with the NBA life. And they also got Seraphin in the Hinrich deal, so that factors into the trade. Yi is an expiring contract that will be a backup for his team, so it's not like they're taking on a giant contract.


Hinrich isn't a SG...why do people keep trying to poney him up as one. He failed in the "hey let's keep Hinrich and move Gordon cause Hinrich can be a SG" experiment. But that's besides the point, the Bulls (and now the Nets) were NOT in the drivers seat on these deals. Each team pretty much HAD TO shed these guys. And instead of doing what he's supposed to be doing (milking it for all it's worth) he basically gave each team a favor. As mentioned before, the Rockets set the market. Grunfeld didn't bother using it. He could have asked for a future 1st rounder from the Bulls and the Nets and you think either team would have said "there's no precedence for that?". He got flubbed.
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,545
And1: 10,445
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#93 » by cgmw » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:23 pm

kosmovitelli wrote:Two years ago, the Suns traded two future unprotected first round picks to get rid of Kurt Thomas and his contract. Last year the Nuggets gave up their 2010 first round pick to get rid of Chris Hunter's $4 mil deal. Both the Suns and Nuggets wanted to avoid the tax or reduce their tax payments. Now you have the greatest free agency bonanza ever and a GM (Ernie Grunfeld) simply accepted to bail other teams out for little compensation. Grunfeld is acting like a cheap whore ready to give a discount to buy her dose of crack. It's as simple as that. Instant cap space is a tremendous asset and should get you more than Hinrich or Yi !


I'm going to do the unthinkable and disagree with you a bit here, Kos.

The Suns and Nuggets were forced by ownership into making those deals to avoid a financial penalty at a set deadline. Here, the Bulls and Nets had no such mandate. Yes, they were under pressure to clear more cap, but neither team would be willing to mortgage its future on the mere chance that LeBron would come.

To me, that's a big difference from ownership forcing the GM into cutting payroll. Hinrich and a mid-1st isn't a great deal, but it's not that bad. Having a 23 year old Yi spreading the floor at SF while opening up the Chinese fanbase seems well worth $4 mil.

Maybe you disagree and think he got raked over the coals. Fine. But the idea that Grunfeld has it out for the Knicks just seems ridiculous.
nyqua11
Banned User
Posts: 1,799
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2009

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#94 » by nyqua11 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:23 pm

moocow007 wrote:Doesn't really matter if you don't need that guy that "actually plays and contributes". You need to go no further in understanding that then just looking back at pretty much nearly all of Isiah Thomas' trades. In every trade he got the best talent, the guys that "actually plays and contributes" the best. Didn't matter if the Knicks didn't really need them or have use for them nor that they didn't fit financially...but boy were they better than the guys we gave up (whoopy!!).


Well Hinrich's deal is for 2 more years only, and they got him AND Seraphin for nothing. This team isn't going to contend for 2+ years anyway, so why not add Hinrich if it means getting a young prospect. And he should be able to move Hinrich in a deal either this year or next year when he is an EXPIRING contract (Jeez isn't that really valuable? Or is it only valuable if it's Curry's expiring?)
nyqua11
Banned User
Posts: 1,799
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2009

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#95 » by nyqua11 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:34 pm

moocow007 wrote:Hinrich isn't a SG...why do people keep trying to poney him up as one. He failed in the "hey let's keep Hinrich and move Gordon cause Hinrich can be a SG" experiment. But that's besides the point, the Bulls (and now the Nets) were NOT in the drivers seat on these deals. Each team pretty much HAD TO shed these guys. And instead of doing what he's supposed to be doing (milking it for all it's worth) he basically gave each team a favor. As mentioned before, the Rockets set the market. Grunfeld didn't bother using it. He could have asked for a future 1st rounder from the Bulls and the Nets and you think either team would have said "there's no precedence for that?". He got flubbed.


Then keep Hinrich as a backup to both positions because he can fill in at both for 20-30 minutes a game.

And it just sounds like you're mad Walsh overpaid to get the second max slot months ago. u mad? If Walsh wasn't dead set on getting two max slots months ago he could have tried to swing a deal now for less, as the market has shown with these other deals. And Houston said they were fine with keeping McGrady and letting his deal expire.

Also Jeffries got much fewer minutes and more DNPs when he went to the Rockets because he's a bad player with a bad contract. Hinrich is a decent player who is overpaid.
User avatar
kosmovitelli
RealGM
Posts: 11,006
And1: 429
Joined: Aug 09, 2001

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#96 » by kosmovitelli » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:38 pm

cgmw wrote:I'm going to do the unthinkable and disagree with you a bit here, Kos.

How dare you ? LOL

cgmw wrote:The Suns and Nuggets were forced by ownership into making those deals to avoid a financial penalty at a set deadline.


They made these trades during the summer and the deadline for the luxury tax was june 30. They had more time to make a trade to lower payroll. I don't blame the Nuggets because their pick was lottery protected but the Suns gave up two unprotected first round picks. There are different ways to trim payroll. For example, at the time, there was a rumor about Shawn Marion being shopped to lower team's salaries. Instead of trading Marion for Shaq, the Suns could have traded Marion ($17 mil) for a $10 million player (in a multiplayer trade). They didn't have to give up two unprotected first round picks.

cgmw wrote:Maybe you disagree and think he got raked over the coals. Fine. But the idea that Grunfeld has it out for the Knicks just seems ridiculous.


It's fishy and suspicious because Grunfeld traded away Caron Butler, Haywood and Jamison to reduce payroll and clear cap room and all he can show for it is Hinrich, Yi and Seraphin. Butler, Haywoff and Jamison are three good players. I understand for Jamison but Haywood was an expiring contract and Butler is under contract until 2011 (just like Hinrich). Frankly I'd rather have Butler and Haywood than Hinrich and Yi and it's not even close !
Huey Freeman
General Manager
Posts: 7,571
And1: 879
Joined: Nov 13, 2003
Location: Everywhere

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#97 » by Huey Freeman » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:46 pm

kosmovitelli wrote:It's fishy and suspicious because Grunfeld traded away Caron Butler, Haywood and Jamison to reduce payroll and clear cap room and all he can show for it is Hinrich, Yi and Seraphin. Butler, Haywoff and Jamison are three good players. I understand for Jamison but Haywood was an expiring contract and Butler is under contract until 2011 (just like Hinrich). Frankly I'd rather have Butler and Haywood than Hinrich and Yi and it's not even close !

I think the ownership and winning the #1 prize that is being deemed "a can't miss" stud changed their direction pre-deadline trade plan; teams are allowed to change plan if they get a few things to fall their way for the betterment of their future. :wink:
Revolution starts in the mind...
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#98 » by moocow007 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:15 pm

nyqua11 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:Doesn't really matter if you don't need that guy that "actually plays and contributes". You need to go no further in understanding that then just looking back at pretty much nearly all of Isiah Thomas' trades. In every trade he got the best talent, the guys that "actually plays and contributes" the best. Didn't matter if the Knicks didn't really need them or have use for them nor that they didn't fit financially...but boy were they better than the guys we gave up (whoopy!!).


Well Hinrich's deal is for 2 more years only, and they got him AND Seraphin for nothing. This team isn't going to contend for 2+ years anyway, so why not add Hinrich if it means getting a young prospect. And he should be able to move Hinrich in a deal either this year or next year when he is an EXPIRING contract (Jeez isn't that really valuable? Or is it only valuable if it's Curry's expiring?)


What exactly has Seraphin done? And Jeffries contract was SMALLER and only had 2 more years on it AND the Rockets got Jordan Hill, a 2012 1st rounder AND the right to swap 1st round picks AND had the Knicks pickup a larger total salary for this year than what they gave up. And the Wizards depth is in their frontcourt so what exactly is Seraphin a dire need for?

If the team isn't going to contend for 2+ years anway, what on earth would you need to pay a backup veteran PG $8 million a year for?!?!?!!??! Not sure why this is so hard to understand in terms of being an awful move by the Wizards?

And Jeez pure capspace (i.e. what they gave up IS more valuable than a guy with 2 years left on his big contract that they have no use for). Why is this also so hard to understand?!?!?! Holy smokes and goodness grief.

But wow...they got Seraphin!!! Whoopie-doo.
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,545
And1: 10,445
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#99 » by cgmw » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:25 pm

^

Whoa, Moo. Take it easy. Say what you will, but Hinrich is a solid veteran who is capable of playing both guard positions because he is a top-notch defender. To me the greatest benefit of the trade for Washington (besides the 17 pick) is creating the public perception that John Wall is NOT being mentored by Gilbert Arenas. I think the Wizards are terrified of having the Glibert effect spread to their new messiah and needed a guy like Hinrich to come in and relieve the pressure.

It also lends credence to the idea that Grunfeld is actively shopping Arenas, which is something else the local fan base really wants to see. I live in DC and that's the way I see it.

The last thing I'll say is that Kirk Hinrich got that $8 million contract because he's good enough be the starting point guard on most NBA teams, including the Knicks. Having him as back up for John Wall is a great situation for the Wiz and has nothing to do with Grunfeld trying to screw over the Knicks or build dynasties in Chicago or New Jersey.
nyqua11
Banned User
Posts: 1,799
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2009

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#100 » by nyqua11 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:30 pm

moocow007 wrote:What exactly has Seraphin done? And Jeffries contract was SMALLER and only had 2 more years on it AND the Rockets got Jordan Hill, a 2012 1st rounder AND the right to swap 1st round picks AND had the Knicks pickup a larger total salary for this year than what they gave up. And the Wizards depth is in their frontcourt so what exactly is Seraphin a dire need for?

If the team isn't going to contend for 2+ years anway, what on earth would you need to pay a backup veteran PG $8 million a year for?!?!?!!??! Not sure why this is so hard to understand in terms of being an awful move by the Wizards?

And Jeez pure capspace (i.e. what they gave up IS more valuable than a guy with 2 years left on his big contract that they have no use for). Why is this also so hard to understand?!?!?! Holy smokes and goodness grief.

But wow...they got Seraphin!!! Whoopie-doo.


Be young and athletic, thus showing potential? I mean, he's a prospect. What did any player show before coming to the NBA? And Jeffries is a really bad player with a bad contract. And the Knicks WANTED T-Mac, so don't act like it was a burden to take him. Seraphin isn't a dire need, he's a young athletic big who may have a Ibaka-like effect for their team this year or next. Stop acting like Seraphin is a horrible prospect because he is a rookie and not on the Knicks. If the Knicks had him I'm sure you would be ecstatic.

Because Hinrich is....um...pretty good? He is overpaid, but he can play both guard positions and shoot really well. Why not pick him up with unused cap space if you can? Plus the fact he can help mentor Wall is a plus.

What would they do with that cap space? What FA would want to sign with them? Why throw away MORE cap space on a FA and for more years when you're not ready to contend?

And to compare the trades, Jeffries is horrible with a horrible contract. So the Knicks had to throw in some picks to move him and the Rockets capitalized on the Knicks being desperate to move him.

Hinrich is overpaid, but has shown he can start at PG for most teams and play SG while contributing on both ends of the court.

It just sounds like you're mad Walsh traded Jeffries at the wrong time, and you're trying to blame Grunnie for some reason.
bgroban
Junior
Posts: 369
And1: 70
Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#101 » by bgroban » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:53 pm

moocow007 wrote:
nyqua11 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:Then he's done a terrible job worrying about his team. What he should be doing is pursuing every option possible in moving Arenas to Orlando for anything (even Rashard Lewis). THAT is what he needed the most to do...to get Arenas the heck out of there and away from Wall while adding someone that doesn't make more (and right now NO ONE IN THE NBA makes more than Arenas) and who can actually contribute. He didn't need to get a "good guy" to "tutor" Wall (as was supposedly the justification for Hinrich)...honestly does anyone really actually and honestly believe that Wall believes he needs anyone to "mentor" him? And Yi? Wow that's a terrible trade. Yi stinks (he does) and he's a puss (he is). Why would you want a guy who shrivels at the first sign of pressure on your team? To show the other players that they too can go into a shell at the first sign of trouble?

Deals like this has happened before. In NY. Starting roughly 5 years ago. Get the best talent, regardless of need, fit, salary or bargaining power. Honestly, looks like Ernie is trying to challenge Kublai Kahn for worst GM in the NBA right now.


I assume he is trying to move Arenas, then he can plug Hinrich into the SG spot or have him backup both positions. And he can trade Hinrich in the future for future picks to a contending team this year or next year. And Wall is 19/20 years old. Lots of young players aren't ready for the NBA and Hinrich can help him cope and deal with the NBA life. And they also got Seraphin in the Hinrich deal, so that factors into the trade. Yi is an expiring contract that will be a backup for his team, so it's not like they're taking on a giant contract.


Hinrich isn't a SG...why do people keep trying to poney him up as one. He failed in the "hey let's keep Hinrich and move Gordon cause Hinrich can be a SG" experiment. But that's besides the point, the Bulls (and now the Nets) were NOT in the drivers seat on these deals. Each team pretty much HAD TO shed these guys. And instead of doing what he's supposed to be doing (milking it for all it's worth) he basically gave each team a favor. As mentioned before, the Rockets set the market. Grunfeld didn't bother using it. He could have asked for a future 1st rounder from the Bulls and the Nets and you think either team would have said "there's no precedence for that?". He got flubbed.


Do you work in the Wizards' front office, or any front office for that matter? Do you know for sure what GMs around the League are discussing? How do you know what EG has been asking for?
User avatar
the_warden
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 13
Joined: Jun 30, 2009
Location: TUCSON, AZ

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#102 » by the_warden » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:57 pm

Why not make a run at a Curry for Yi trade? I think the Wizards have just enough cap room to take on Curry's deal. I don't know what you guys could possibly give up to entice such a trade, though. You'd still have Yi's $4.1M on the books, but that is much less than Curry's figure and Yi would still be moveable (Q-Rich style).
@RyanOutrich wrote:@chrisbosh seems just like yesterday u hatched ouuta ur shell and the ugliest dino of them all was born
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#103 » by BrooklynBulls » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:19 pm

Who cares to discuss Hinrich's quality as a player? It simply doesn't matter anymore. He's entered the pit of despair known as the Wizards franchise. Why was he traded for? Grunfeld likes him for some reason. What reason? Who could wager to say? Who knows? Maybe Grunfeld just wants Wall to look even more athletic when he's running beside Hinrich. Maybe he thought Hinrich had magical powers and he could fold the basketball franchise and open a quidditch league. Who can read the thinking of a guy who's proven he's not good at his job?
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,545
And1: 10,445
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#104 » by cgmw » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:34 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:Who cares to discuss Hinrich's quality as a player? It simply doesn't matter anymore. He's entered the pit of despair known as the Wizards franchise. Why was he traded for? Grunfeld likes him for some reason. What reason? Who could wager to say? Who knows? Maybe Grunfeld just wants Wall to look even more athletic when he's running beside Hinrich. Maybe he thought Hinrich had magical powers and he could fold the basketball franchise and open a quidditch league. Who can read the thinking of a guy who's proven he's not good at his job?


No. Scott Layden proved he wasn't good at his job.

Wikipedia wrote: While Grunfeld was the Knicks top executive, New York advanced to at least the Conference Semifinals of the NBA Playoffs each season. He had five 50-plus win seasons, three Atlantic Division Championships, and two trips to the NBA Finals (in 1994 and 1999). In eight seasons as general manager or vice-president of player personnel, his Knicks teams had a record of 397–227 (.636), and a 61–44 record in the playoffs.


In fact, the year he got fired (1998) the Knicks team he assembled made the Finals. Oakley for Camby. Starks for Sprewell. Very unpopular moves at the time that proved highly successful. Larry Johnson's 4 point play helped.

You can pretty much trace the demise of the Knicks directly to Grunfeld's firing. But that's neither here nor there.

Back ON TOPIC -- I don't think any of us should be terribly afraid that New Jersey now has $4 million more in cap space. Think about it. Unless Russian Soprano makes an offer they can't refuse, what Free Agent is choosing the NEW JERSEY NETS over a comparable job in New York? The Nets were going to get second choice BEFORE this move, and they'll still get second choice AFTER this move.
User avatar
XcalibuR
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,099
And1: 79
Joined: Jan 04, 2005

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#105 » by XcalibuR » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:56 pm

Good trade for both teams. Yi is actually a very talented player, just very timid and soft. Hes also been badly coached by pretty much all of his coaches, making him a perimeter shooter instead of developing/utilizing any of his low-post talents. Good trade for Yi as well, Washington has some hot asian girls.
KnicksBigTime
Junior
Posts: 437
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#106 » by KnicksBigTime » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:39 pm

The Nets are dead in the water. The person trying to recruit free agents....is leaving. He's supposed to convince people to come? Hilarious.
knicksNOTslick
RealGM
Posts: 17,881
And1: 5,185
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: NYC Queens
     

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#107 » by knicksNOTslick » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:02 am

Grunfeld's trades aren't bad. They're good. They actually help his franchise.... BUT all these teams are so desperate to get under the cap that you can actually demand more and hose those teams out of their assets. That's what the Rockets did to us and I think Grunfeld could've gotten a little more. Doesn't matter though because I still don't think the Nets have a chance.
StutterStep
RealGM
Posts: 30,424
And1: 58
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: WAIVED

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#108 » by StutterStep » Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:01 am

Nets management either cannot move Harris/Lopez or are really stupid!

They're moving the young guys with decent talent and flexible skill-sets (CDR, Yi) for scrap!
StutterStep
RealGM
Posts: 30,424
And1: 58
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: WAIVED

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#109 » by StutterStep » Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:14 am

If they decline Josh Howard's option and make a S/T for a PF (Bosh, Boozer) or Rudy Gay by using Blatche, the Wiz might leapfrog both Nets and Knicks if we don't get very good players.
TheBluest
Banned User
Posts: 25,808
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 31, 2006
Location: Lottery Bound...Banned From UK 2-11-09 @ 12:30 am by Martin LOL!

Re: Has anyone seen this? (Yi Jianlian Potential Trade) 

Post#110 » by TheBluest » Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:29 am

StutterStep wrote:Nets management either cannot move Harris/Lopez or are really stupid!

They're moving the young guys with decent talent and flexible skill-sets (CDR, Yi) for scrap!


Last player to be moved is Harris and I hit the Trifecta Stutter. I told you they were absolute goners. Fegan got on the Nets nerves as did Yi with his play. Nets tried to move Harris in the Granger deal but no could do as you said. I think Avery would prefer he stick around too. But if he's all kinds of shaky to start the season he's Audi 5000 G.

Return to New York Knicks