Why did we trade Marcum?
Moderator: JaysRule15
Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,713
- And1: 3,442
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Why did we trade Marcum?
He was one of (if not the) the most consistent pitchers we had last year, he's KILLING it this year (yeahyeah NL), and he's only 29. It didn't make sense to me then and it sure as hell doesnt make sense to me now.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,098
- And1: 3,629
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
we got a cant-miss prospect that has been destroying pitchers in every league he has ever played in, and will be a mainstay at 3rd base for years. we all liked marcum too, but these are the types of trades, risks, you have to take to get better and stay better.
obviously it doesn't help that our rotation hasn't been lights out, but a prime romero, morrow, drabek, cecil will be good enough to pitch this team into contention imo. lawrie fills a major hole at 3rd and likely at the top half of the order in his prime. he will be more valuable in his prime than marcum would have been.
obviously it doesn't help that our rotation hasn't been lights out, but a prime romero, morrow, drabek, cecil will be good enough to pitch this team into contention imo. lawrie fills a major hole at 3rd and likely at the top half of the order in his prime. he will be more valuable in his prime than marcum would have been.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 505
- And1: 29
- Joined: Oct 17, 2006
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Because we have five quality starting pitchers younger than him that are major league ready and have better raw stuff (Morrow, Romero, Cecil, Stewart, Drabek). And, beyond this we have three other quality starting pitchers younger than him that are major league ready with comparable raw stuff (Reyes, Villaneuva, litsch). Beyond that, we have plenty more quality starting pitchers younger than him that are not quite major league ready but have better raw stuff (McGowan, Alvares, McGuire, etc...).
On the other hand, our third base situation consists of E5, who had 8 errors in about twenty games, who lost his job to Jayson Nix, a journeyman who was dropped from another teams 40 man roster. Jayson Nix, in turn is hitting about .190. We had no viable third basemen in the system (Emaus? No). So, why not fill this position of need with a 21 year old that was raking in AAA and experts are now ranking in the top 5 or 10 prospects in all of baseball.
On the other hand, our third base situation consists of E5, who had 8 errors in about twenty games, who lost his job to Jayson Nix, a journeyman who was dropped from another teams 40 man roster. Jayson Nix, in turn is hitting about .190. We had no viable third basemen in the system (Emaus? No). So, why not fill this position of need with a 21 year old that was raking in AAA and experts are now ranking in the top 5 or 10 prospects in all of baseball.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,274
- And1: 10,300
- Joined: Feb 21, 2006
-
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
The reasoning was that Marcum presented the most potential returning value for a player who wasn't "off limits". Especially among our pitchers, where we were and still are pretty loaded with starters for a rebuilding team. Marcum was a guy who 1. was coming off a great season, 2. presented injury risk (more than the usual starter), 3. was at the sweet spot in his service timeline where he'd given us our money's worth and then become attractive to buyers because he was under control for two more years, and 4. the Jays had always prized Lawrie going back to the draft when they just missed out on him.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- -MetA4-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,902
- And1: 548
- Joined: May 28, 2003
- Location: London
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Marcum struggled against AL East opposition. He's a great pitcher, but Boston and New York eat pitchers like him up. If you've paid any attention Anthopolous has preached adding more traditional power pitchers that pitch off of their fastballs.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- youngLion
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,207
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 24, 2005
- Location: Toronto
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Well aside from the fact that the team got a star prospect back, wasn't one of the biggest issues his service time? The Jays had less control over Marcum than any of their other starters, so between that and the wealth of SP depth in the minors Marcum was the guy who made the most sense to trade. It's a cliché, but you have to give something to get something, and aside from the draft there's no way to get a guy like Lawrie without giving up something good.

Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,457
- And1: 17,977
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Hoopstarr wrote:The reasoning was that Marcum presented the most potential returning value for a player who wasn't "off limits". Especially among our pitchers, where we were and still are pretty loaded with starters for a rebuilding team. Marcum was a guy who 1. was coming off a great season, 2. presented injury risk (more than the usual starter), 3. was at the sweet spot in his service timeline where he'd given us our money's worth and then become attractive to buyers because he was under control for two more years, and 4. the Jays had always prized Lawrie going back to the draft when they just missed out on him.
Yup. And while Marcum was a very good pitcher, I'd rather have a 21 year old who independent evaluators have called a superstar-in-waiting, rather than a good 29 year old starting pitcher with somewhat worrisome mechanics.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,444
- And1: 2,142
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
I think the Jays actually undervalued Marcum at the time, and I said as much. Lawrie busting out and (hopefully) sticking at 3B lessens that a bit, but a super affordable 3.5 WAR starter who had a 3.72 ERA from 2007-2010 pitching in the AL East is pretty darn good. As you can see by how Drabek, Cecil, etc, have done this season, there is no such thing as a guaranteed pitching prospect. Good teams hold on to the Shaun Marcum's of the world until they become too expensive for what they produce (which Marcum wasn't in our case). Really the only negative with Marcum is injury concern, not so much with his history (he's only had TJS and no other real significant injury to my knowledge), but moreso his mechanics and delivery. That is really a judgment call.
It wasn't a bad trade by any stretch, and if Lawrie pans out then no one in Jays land will remember Marcum a few years from now, but I think fans were really sleeping on how good Marcum is/was. Then again, can't really complain with Lawrie + Villanueva as the return (I'm guessing that deal will just combine with each other eventually).
It wasn't a bad trade by any stretch, and if Lawrie pans out then no one in Jays land will remember Marcum a few years from now, but I think fans were really sleeping on how good Marcum is/was. Then again, can't really complain with Lawrie + Villanueva as the return (I'm guessing that deal will just combine with each other eventually).
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,799
- And1: 72,150
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Brett Lawrie.
That is all.
That is all.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- xAIRNESSx
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,516
- And1: 13,930
- Joined: Jan 06, 2005
-
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Maybe they were worried about his TJ surgery and some of the minor arm problems he had last season. I know I was. He seemed a little risky in that regard, but he's definitely tearing it up this season.

Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- darth_federer
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,060
- And1: 922
- Joined: Apr 12, 2009
- Contact:
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Mustard called it before the season when he said that Marcum would kill it in the NL. We got a future star prospect out of the deal. No brainer IMO.

Profanity wrote:This is why I question a Canadian team in our league. it's a govt conspiracy trina to sell all our milk to Russia. They let the raptors participate to not let canadians demand crossing taxes. it will backfire one day.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,605
- And1: 1,832
- Joined: Apr 04, 2007
- Location: Deeznuts
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
We clearly miss him, our pitching is brutal this year
From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.
Good pitching is hard to find in this league
but we'll talk further once we find out how good Lawrie is.
From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.
Good pitching is hard to find in this league
but we'll talk further once we find out how good Lawrie is.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- -MetA4-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,902
- And1: 548
- Joined: May 28, 2003
- Location: London
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
J Dilla wrote:
From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.
Not at all.
Marcum being traded was a pure baseball decision. Only (Please Use More Appropriate Word) media people were pushing the Greinke to Toronto rumors.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- aselvana
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,352
- And1: 886
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: the cold
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
J Dilla wrote:We clearly miss him, our pitching is brutal this year
From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.
Good pitching is hard to find in this league
but we'll talk further once we find out how good Lawrie is.
good pitching is plentiful in the post-steroids era. Even Pat Gillick, once mentioned on a Jays Broadcast, when given two players with same qualities,projections; with the only difference is ones a pitcher and the other is a batter, he would take the batter.
How would you describe Raptors RGM forum in one sentence?
Steelo Green wrote:The one title shouldn’t excuse what was mediocrity all around it.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,547
- And1: 96
- Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Pitching is plentiful nowadays, with the league ERA at 3.80. Having Marcum in our lineup this year may have presented a handful more wins, but in reality, we'd still be roughly five games behind Boston.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,239
- And1: 12,675
- Joined: Aug 08, 2002
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
hmm let me see...
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- JYD
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 32,532
- And1: 7,209
- Joined: Aug 07, 2001
- Location: NOT POSSIBLE! NOT POSSIBLE!
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Forgive me for being late to the party. I was a Jays fan growing up, but haven't really followed baseball in recent years. However I getting back into it and have been following the Jays lately.
We got Lawrie for Marcum? All I know is when I look at Lawrie, I see a beast stud. Marcum has the stuff of a good 3rd starter, no?
We got Lawrie for Marcum? All I know is when I look at Lawrie, I see a beast stud. Marcum has the stuff of a good 3rd starter, no?
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- Weems
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,640
- And1: 95
- Joined: May 24, 2010
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Marcum's stuff isn't electric, but it's good, and he changes speeds well and has excellent control of all of his pitches. His change up is among the best in the game and he throws it a lot. Can't go wrong with a good change up.
He can't go 7 innings every outing, but he's quite a ways better than a 3rd starter to me. Dunno.
He can't go 7 innings every outing, but he's quite a ways better than a 3rd starter to me. Dunno.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
- JYD
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 32,532
- And1: 7,209
- Joined: Aug 07, 2001
- Location: NOT POSSIBLE! NOT POSSIBLE!
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Ok, so maybe a 2nd starter on a decent team. Still, a guy who can't go really deep in games and doesn't have great stuff is somewhat limited come playoff time typically.
I took one look at Lawrie with his strength and balance and hands and got goosebumps, almost.
Haven't watched the baseballs in some time but I've always had a good eye for baseball talent...Lawrie looks like a 15-year face of the franchise type.
I took one look at Lawrie with his strength and balance and hands and got goosebumps, almost.
Haven't watched the baseballs in some time but I've always had a good eye for baseball talent...Lawrie looks like a 15-year face of the franchise type.
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,145
- And1: 1
- Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Re: Why did we trade Marcum?
Hes a 3rd starter on a playoff team, kinda like in Milwaukee (a playoff team) hes the 3rd starter......hmmm. Funny how that works.