ImageImageImageImageImage

Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012

Moderator: JaysRule15

lilneige
Sophomore
Posts: 228
And1: 0
Joined: May 23, 2006

Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#1 » by lilneige » Thu Feb 2, 2012 11:34 am

1. R Yunel Escobar -----------.289/.366/.401
(his career average)

2. L Colby Rasmus ------------.276/.361/.498
(2010 numbers)

3. R Jose Bautista ------------.302/.447/.608
(numbers from last year)

4. L Adam Lind----------------.300/.349/.515
(2011 1st-half of season numbers)

5. R Edwin Encarnacion---------.291/.382/.504
(2011 2nd-half of season numbers)

6. R Brett Lawrie---------------.296/.360/.492
(his minor league career average)

7. L Eric Thames---------------.262/.313/.456
(numbers from last year)

8. R J.P Arencibia---------------.219/.282/.438
(numbers from last year)

9. L Kelly Johnson--------------.270/.364/.417
(numbers from last year while playing for Jays)
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#2 » by Skin Blues » Thu Feb 2, 2012 5:22 pm

Realistic projections (ignore playing time portion): http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/ora ... _blue_jays

Image

FWIW, d'Arnaud is already projected to be as good a hitter as Arencibia. And Francisco's are better than either Thames' or Snider's. Obviously the latter two have more room to improve, though.
BobbyBoy
Banned User
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2011

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#3 » by BobbyBoy » Thu Feb 2, 2012 8:40 pm

Skin Blues wrote:Realistic projections (ignore playing time portion): http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/ora ... _blue_jays

Image

FWIW, d'Arnaud is already projected to be as good a hitter as Arencibia. And Francisco's are better than either Thames' or Snider's. Obviously the latter two have more room to improve, though.

Wow. Those are pretty harsh
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#4 » by Skin Blues » Thu Feb 2, 2012 8:54 pm

That's what happens when you take off the rose-coloured galsses and don't cherry-pick stats. As a Jays fan I'd love to see them put up the optimistic numbers, but it's just not gonna happen.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,453
And1: 17,975
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#5 » by Schad » Thu Feb 2, 2012 10:17 pm

The BTF numbers aren't really harsh at all; assuming replacement-level production from backups and kiddies, that's an above-average offense, probably in line with our 2010 OPS+, and with average situational hitting, probably good for 780 runs or thereabouts. Assume a marginal improvement in our pitching (say, down to 740 runs) and you have a team whose expected record would be around 85-77...not world-beating, but hardly harsh.
Image
**** your asterisk.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 38,273
And1: 21,242
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#6 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Feb 3, 2012 1:07 am

Yeah...I would be more than fine with that many players in our starting lineup with an OPS+ over 100 (especially when Yunel Escobar, one of the team's most dependable OBP guys, isn't even one of them).

That would be a serious bounceback season for Adam Lind considering his last two, for example, one in which I don't really expect.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
lilneige
Sophomore
Posts: 228
And1: 0
Joined: May 23, 2006

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#7 » by lilneige » Fri Feb 3, 2012 2:08 am

That realistic projection isn't harsh at all.

just name a few,

Rasmus .173/.201/.316 (Numbers with Jays last year)
EE .255.283.405 (1st-half of last year)
Lind .197/.233/.356 (2nd-half of last year)
Escobar .238/.334/.284 (2010 with Atlanta)


Those numbers are flat out ugly, it indicates that our lineup has upside, but fluctuate significently.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,539
And1: 16,674
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Optimistic Hitting Projection - 2012 

Post#8 » by Lateral Quicks » Fri Feb 3, 2012 3:49 am

Those "realistic" numbers, while not horrible, would be pretty disappointing. I'd be shocked if our best average hitter bats .275. In fact to my eye most of the averages look to be on the low side.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."

Return to Toronto Blue Jays