Cam Johnson to Warriors

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,819
And1: 8,659
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#1 » by cpower » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:00 pm

Nets IN: Anderson, Kuminga, Moody, GSW 1 FRP 1 Swap
Nets Out: Wilson, Johnson

Warriors IN: Johnson, Beasley
Warriors Out: Kuminga, Anderson, Moody, Schroder, FRP, 1 Swap, SRP

Pistons IN: Schroder, Wilson , SRP
Pistons Out: Beasley


------------
Warriors gets Curry help with shooting and size, free up cap to sign 14 players
Nets gets Kuminga Moody FPR and can trade Anderson to another contender
Pistons get SRP and can flip Schroder to another team
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,834
And1: 7,802
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#2 » by jayjaysee » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:20 pm

Feels pretty steep for me for Johnson. But I was suggesting two unprotected firsts for Kuminga this offseason. So maybe it’s time for me to accept I was wrong on him.

Have also seen a lot of unwarranted hype for Wilson, so maybe his inclusion is the reason for the value?
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 3,387
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#3 » by SkyHook » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:20 pm

According to Fanspo, Moody can't be traded this season since he signed an extension after September 28 (Training Camp) and Schroder can't be aggregated in a trade this season (restriction expires after the deadline).
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,819
And1: 8,659
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#4 » by cpower » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:30 pm

SkyHook wrote:According to Fanspo, Moody can't be traded this season since he signed an extension after September 28 (Training Camp) and Schroder can't be aggregated in a trade this season (restriction expires after the deadline).

neither is true, Moody can be traded but his out going counts as 5.8MM
Schroder was traded before Dec 15 so he can be packaged in another trade
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,819
And1: 8,659
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#5 » by cpower » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:35 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Feels pretty steep for me for Johnson. But I was suggesting two unprotected firsts for Kuminga this offseason. So maybe it’s time for me to accept I was wrong on him.

Have also seen a lot of unwarranted hype for Wilson, so maybe his inclusion is the reason for the value?

if Nets dont want to give up Wilson, swap for Watford. They are just fillers
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,022
And1: 612
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#6 » by NW » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:42 pm

That’s a lot for Cam Johnson. Beasley isn’t much of an addition. Nice addition for GS but not at that price. If that’s his price, look for other options
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,819
And1: 8,659
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#7 » by cpower » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:48 pm

NW wrote:That’s a lot for Cam Johnson. Beasley isn’t much of an addition. Nice addition for GS but not at that price. If that’s his price, look for other options

there is no other option unless you want to give up Green/Wiggins. This is pretty much the best option if you want to keep Curry/Wiggin/Green core. Johnson would close with the group
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,789
And1: 7,888
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#8 » by xdrta+ » Tue Dec 24, 2024 7:52 pm

SkyHook wrote:According to Fanspo, Moody can't be traded this season since he signed an extension after September 28 (Training Camp) and Schroder can't be aggregated in a trade this season (restriction expires after the deadline).


Moody can be traded, for salary matching his outgoing salary for the warriors is $5.8M, his incoming salary for the receiving team is $10.8M. Schroeder can be aggregated on Feb 5 or 6 (trade deadline) not before.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,834
And1: 7,802
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#9 » by jayjaysee » Tue Dec 24, 2024 7:58 pm

cpower wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Feels pretty steep for me for Johnson. But I was suggesting two unprotected firsts for Kuminga this offseason. So maybe it’s time for me to accept I was wrong on him.

Have also seen a lot of unwarranted hype for Wilson, so maybe his inclusion is the reason for the value?

if Nets dont want to give up Wilson, swap for Watford. They are just fillers


I just thought his Wilson’s inclusion was the reason for the swap or the first or something.

I think Kuminga still holds a good amount of value around the league, but admit I am probably off.

If he is being used in this kind of trade at this valuation, I’d love Dallas to try and end up with him. Seems like a really nice third option for the next 2 years, with the hope of developing into a second option when Kai slows down..
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#10 » by OutsidetheNBA » Tue Dec 24, 2024 8:06 pm

Too much for Cam Johnson -- drop the 1st and the swap. He's a good player, but he's 28 and he doesn't have much of a ceiling. I understand the Kuminga flaws, but a Kuminga-Johnson swap is the type of upside bet a rebuilding Nets team should make.

I thought Schroder was supposed to be an ideal fit with Steph? Warriors fans already want to use him as filler?
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#11 » by ejftw » Tue Dec 24, 2024 8:09 pm

That's a first too much, but I can still see some saying it somehow isn't enough for CamJo.

As a fan of a team in the same division as the Warriors, hope they make this move.
TheNetsFan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,419
And1: 2,818
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#12 » by TheNetsFan » Tue Dec 24, 2024 8:34 pm

OutsidetheNBA wrote:Too much for Cam Johnson -- drop the 1st and the swap. He's a good player, but he's 28 and he doesn't have much of a ceiling. I understand the Kuminga flaws, but a Kuminga-Johnson swap is the type of upside bet a rebuilding Nets team should make.

I thought Schroder was supposed to be an ideal fit with Steph? Warriors fans already want to use him as filler?

If the Nets loved Kuminga and they were an over the cap team next year, and needed his bird rights then you might be right. But outside of maybe Washington, it doesn't look like anyone besides the Nets will have enough money to give Kuminga a big offer. Unless the Nets are convinced Kuminga would prefer Washington or that the Warriors will back up the truck & match a large offer for Kuminga, why trade for him now & pay a premium to do it? They're better off getting assets for Johnson in a trade with another team, and then pursuing Kuminga in free agency. This all assumes that the Nets actually value Kuminga as a high salary player.

Similar to previous hypothetical Ingram trades, Kuminga/Ingram hold more trade value in deals to other potential teams, mainly over the cap teams, than they would the Nets.
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#13 » by OutsidetheNBA » Tue Dec 24, 2024 8:42 pm

TheNetsFan wrote:
OutsidetheNBA wrote:Too much for Cam Johnson -- drop the 1st and the swap. He's a good player, but he's 28 and he doesn't have much of a ceiling. I understand the Kuminga flaws, but a Kuminga-Johnson swap is the type of upside bet a rebuilding Nets team should make.

I thought Schroder was supposed to be an ideal fit with Steph? Warriors fans already want to use him as filler?

If the Nets loved Kuminga and they were an over the cap team next year, and needed his bird rights then you might be right. But outside of maybe Washington, it doesn't look like anyone besides the Nets will have enough money to give Kuminga a big offer. Unless the Nets are convinced Kuminga would prefer Washington or that the Warriors will back up the truck & match a large offer for Kuminga, why trade for him now & pay a premium to do it? They're better off getting assets for Johnson in a trade with another team, and then pursuing Kuminga in free agency. This all assumes that the Nets actually value Kuminga as a high salary player.

Similar to previous hypothetical Ingram trades, Kuminga/Ingram hold more trade value in deals to other potential teams, mainly over the cap teams, than they would the Nets.


Fair point, but I think the Warriors are smart enough to either trade Kuminga or commit to matching any deal this offseason -- the Nets signing Kuminga seems unrealistic. Which means IF the Nets value him (big IF), then they'll have to trade for him and are competing with other contending teams in the market.
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,022
And1: 612
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#14 » by NW » Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:54 pm

cpower wrote:
NW wrote:That’s a lot for Cam Johnson. Beasley isn’t much of an addition. Nice addition for GS but not at that price. If that’s his price, look for other options

there is no other option unless you want to give up Green/Wiggins. This is pretty much the best option if you want to keep Curry/Wiggin/Green core. Johnson would close with the group


There are other options in the 20+ mil range (DeRozen, Vucevic, Kuzma etc.) That can be dome with a mix of 3 for 1 deals and 1_for 3 deals.

If the Dubs want to go all in, there are talent in the 30+ mil area too (Butler, Ingram, Lavine). Those would require Wiggins or Green, which makes those unlikely.
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 3,618
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#15 » by axeman23 » Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:47 pm

cpower wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Feels pretty steep for me for Johnson. But I was suggesting two unprotected firsts for Kuminga this offseason. So maybe it’s time for me to accept I was wrong on him.

Have also seen a lot of unwarranted hype for Wilson, so maybe his inclusion is the reason for the value?

if Nets dont want to give up Wilson, swap for Watford. They are just fillers


If Wilson is not there to add value, I don't see Cam J being worth that return. You'd be bidding against yourself with that offer, I suspect. I'd swap out Moody for Looney, or dial down the pick compensation myself. But you're the GS fan, not me...
RollingWave
Starter
Posts: 2,073
And1: 794
Joined: Apr 06, 2006

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#16 » by RollingWave » Wed Dec 25, 2024 5:45 am

That's alot, if that offer is out there the Nets should probably take it and run

This is assuming some desperation on the part of GSW, which might be true I suppose
The river of time wash away all heroes
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,047
And1: 5,551
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Cam Johnson to Warriors 

Post#17 » by One_and_Done » Wed Dec 25, 2024 9:46 pm

Warriors fans will hate it, but honestly they're not giving up much of value here.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.

Return to Trades and Transactions