This is has discussed alot on our board and with all the rumors that the Raptors like Monk, Kings used to have interest in Kuzma and Bucks "rumored' interest in RJ
Kings get: Kuzma
Why - They were interested in him before he was traded to the bucks - get out of a year of monk
Raptors get: Monk
Why - With Barnes/Ingram, they need a bigger PF and Kuzma fits that role.
Bucks get: RJ Barrett
WHy - They need a wing, RJ fits that role.
Don't know about draft picks, but those will probably need to be sent out
MIL/TOR/SAC
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,947
- And1: 12,076
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
Pass on this. Zero interest in kuzma. The only circumstance I accept kuzma is for derozan with value coming back to sac.
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,057
- And1: 263
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
I wouldn't be completely against Kuzma to the kings but I am pretty sure Scott Perry would be. He doesn't seem like a scott.perry guy
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,939
- And1: 4,533
- Joined: Dec 16, 2014
- Contact:
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
I don’t really get why Raps would trade RJ for Monk.
RJ is bigger, younger, a better scorer and rebounder.
Monk is a better playmaker, but even then, the difference is about 1 assist per game.
Maybe this is a cost cutting move to duck the tax? It has to be more. Think Milwaukee probably pays something to both Sacramento and Toronto here.
RJ is bigger, younger, a better scorer and rebounder.
Monk is a better playmaker, but even then, the difference is about 1 assist per game.
Maybe this is a cost cutting move to duck the tax? It has to be more. Think Milwaukee probably pays something to both Sacramento and Toronto here.
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,068
- And1: 7,436
- Joined: Jul 26, 2004
- Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
-
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
mlloyd10 wrote:This is has discussed alot on our board and with all the rumors that the Raptors like Monk, Kings used to have interest in Kuzma and Bucks "rumored' interest in RJ
Kings get: Kuzma
Why - They were interested in him before he was traded to the bucks - get out of a year of monk
Raptors get: Monk
Why - With Barnes/Ingram, they need a bigger PF and Kuzma fits that role.
Bucks get: RJ Barrett
WHy - They need a wing, RJ fits that role.
Don't know about draft picks, but those will probably need to be sent out
Don't really like the Kings fit here. I like the idea of Raps and Bucks, but I would rather see IQ making his way down.
Bucks trade Kuz+ to team X
Team X trades thing to Wiz for CJ
CJ plus asset from MIL goes to TOR
Bucks get IQ?
Could Miami with Rozier be that team?
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,460
- And1: 2,077
- Joined: Oct 27, 2001
- Location: Newfoundland
Re: MIL/TOR/SAC
MessiahUjiri wrote:I don’t really get why Raps would trade RJ for Monk.
RJ is bigger, younger, a better scorer and rebounder.
Monk is a better playmaker, but even then, the difference is about 1 assist per game.
Maybe this is a cost cutting move to duck the tax? It has to be more. Think Milwaukee probably pays something to both Sacramento and Toronto here.
Pros:
-Duck the tax
-Big upgrade at backup PG
Cons:
-Lose RJ as an Ingram injury replacement
But when Ingram is healthy, Monk probably helps us win more games:
Poeltl-Mogbo
Barnes-CMB
Ingram-Dick
Agbaji-Walter
Quickley-Monk
and hopefully there's a stretchy big in the draft next year when we pick.
Where's the D?
Return to Trades and Transactions