ImageImageImage

TJ Ford.

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

TJ Ford. 

Post#1 » by Krapinsky » Mon May 5, 2008 8:28 pm

I noticed his trade value on the trade board is surprisingly low. Although you have to take into consideration his injury concerns, he was 6th in the league from a PER standpoint at the PG position last year.

If we don't get Rose, is there any interest in trading for Ford if something like this can get it done:

Walker/McCants for Ford/Baston?


Ford/Foye/Jefferson/Brewer/Gomes/Our pick/FA center

I think that team has a shot at the playoffs next year with room to build.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: TJ Ford. 

Post#2 » by shrink » Mon May 5, 2008 8:50 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:I noticed his trade value on the trade board is surprisingly low..


Except from the leagues of TOR fans.

He's BYC, so we'd be adding additional salary, plus the length of his contract ($8.6 ave through 2011) makes me too nervous with his injury history.

Personally I like the guy, but I don't think the risk is worth the return.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

 

Post#3 » by PeeDee » Mon May 5, 2008 8:51 pm

After having endured Michael Williams, Terrell Brandon, Troy Hudson and just having had Foye come off of a long injury stint... I'd prefer to stay clear of any injury plagued PG.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,528
And1: 1,976
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by chrbal » Mon May 5, 2008 9:07 pm

Best reasoning ever. I actually was going to post about if the Wolves could "buy low", but I forgot about all that.

The Wolves luck Ford would play 5 games, look unbelieveable and then just about never ever play again.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#5 » by deeney0 » Mon May 5, 2008 9:11 pm

I'm not interested.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by 4ho5ive » Mon May 5, 2008 10:09 pm

I like Ford, just not for this team.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#7 » by Krapinsky » Mon May 5, 2008 11:01 pm

Understandable. A little surprised no one is a little tempted though.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

 

Post#8 » by prefuse73 » Mon May 5, 2008 11:36 pm

He would be okay, my main deal is that if Foye is going to be moved to SG, I want a PG that is 6'3 or 6'4 so we don't get too small.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: TJ Ford. 

Post#9 » by horaceworthy » Tue May 6, 2008 4:16 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:I noticed his trade value on the trade board is surprisingly low. Although you have to take into consideration his injury concerns, he was 6th in the league from a PER standpoint at the PG position last year.


You have to consider where he put up those numbers, though. Rafer Alston, Mike James, Ford and Jose Calderon (aside from his rookie season) have all had career years from a PER standpoint under Sam Mitchell. Just something worth noting.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#10 » by Krapinsky » Tue May 6, 2008 4:56 pm

^^^That's a very good point.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Tekkenlaw
Starter
Posts: 2,078
And1: 39
Joined: Apr 16, 2008

 

Post#11 » by Tekkenlaw » Tue May 6, 2008 5:09 pm

That Walker/McCants package seems to be our best trade piece since we don't include Foye or Brewer so I would rather use it to find a center since that is our most glaring need.
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#12 » by TrentTuckerForever » Tue May 6, 2008 5:54 pm

prefuse73 wrote:He would be okay, my main deal is that if Foye is going to be moved to SG, I want a PG that is 6'3 or 6'4 so we don't get too small.


I wouldn't keep Foye if he's not going to be the point guard (I think he needs the ball to be effective.) And you're right regardless, a Foye/Ford backcourt would be too small.

I might participate in a larger deal with Ford ending up in MN, but a two-team deal doesn't look to make sense.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves