2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,414
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 03, 2006
2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Ok, I've been thinking about options for next year. Here is where we stand:
Salary Luxury Tax = approx 75 million
Jazz roster =
DW = 16 million
AK = 16 million
Booze = 12.5 million (player option)
Memo = 9 million (player option)
Harp = 6.5 million
Korver = 5 million
CJ = 4 million
Brew = 3 million
Koufos = 1 million
Fes = 1 million (team option)
Total w/options = 74 million (10 players under contract)
Total w/out options = 52.5 million (7 players under contract - Booze and Memo will opt out, and I think Fes will not be picked up)
We will have 22.5 million to sign 5 players.
Here are my estimates for market value:
Booze = 18 million
Okur = 12 million
Sap = 6 million
Price = 3 million
Knight = 3 million
Draft picks = 2 million
So barring any trades I'm thinking the decision is Booze vs Memo+Sap. Tough choice.
Salary Luxury Tax = approx 75 million
Jazz roster =
DW = 16 million
AK = 16 million
Booze = 12.5 million (player option)
Memo = 9 million (player option)
Harp = 6.5 million
Korver = 5 million
CJ = 4 million
Brew = 3 million
Koufos = 1 million
Fes = 1 million (team option)
Total w/options = 74 million (10 players under contract)
Total w/out options = 52.5 million (7 players under contract - Booze and Memo will opt out, and I think Fes will not be picked up)
We will have 22.5 million to sign 5 players.
Here are my estimates for market value:
Booze = 18 million
Okur = 12 million
Sap = 6 million
Price = 3 million
Knight = 3 million
Draft picks = 2 million
So barring any trades I'm thinking the decision is Booze vs Memo+Sap. Tough choice.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,247
- And1: 14
- Joined: Apr 02, 2006
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
This used to be more of a tough choice than I think it is now. I don't want to be overly enamored with how Milsap has played during the last few games, but I also think that it boils down to Booze vs. Memo and Milsap.
Maybe this is overly simplistic on my part, but I think that we go with Milsap and Memo for three reasons:
1. Milsap is more durable than Boozer is, and it's not particularly close.
2. We're beyond stuck if we let Memo and Milsap go, resign Boozer and then Boozer gets reinjured again. Having two talented players on the roster is better at least from an injury insurance perspective.
3. Are we really missing Boozer over the last several games? He's a fantastic offensive player no doubt, but the defensive deficiencies don't play well to competing in the playoffs.
This year, the collective stats for Memo and Milsap track at 28.4 ppg, 13.9 rpg, 1.6 bpg, 3.1 apg and 1.39 spg. Boozer's metrics track @ 20.5 ppg, 11.7 rpg, .25 bpg, 2.7 apg and .92 spg. Milsap's impressive average are understated by the fact that he's only averaging 27 minutes per game.
Beyond the injuries, the drama factor seems to be 500% less with Memo and Paul as well. I don't want to see Booze leave, but it's pretty cut and dry to me. I just hope that Boozer doesn't end up in the Western Conference somewhere...
Maybe this is overly simplistic on my part, but I think that we go with Milsap and Memo for three reasons:
1. Milsap is more durable than Boozer is, and it's not particularly close.
2. We're beyond stuck if we let Memo and Milsap go, resign Boozer and then Boozer gets reinjured again. Having two talented players on the roster is better at least from an injury insurance perspective.
3. Are we really missing Boozer over the last several games? He's a fantastic offensive player no doubt, but the defensive deficiencies don't play well to competing in the playoffs.
This year, the collective stats for Memo and Milsap track at 28.4 ppg, 13.9 rpg, 1.6 bpg, 3.1 apg and 1.39 spg. Boozer's metrics track @ 20.5 ppg, 11.7 rpg, .25 bpg, 2.7 apg and .92 spg. Milsap's impressive average are understated by the fact that he's only averaging 27 minutes per game.
Beyond the injuries, the drama factor seems to be 500% less with Memo and Paul as well. I don't want to see Booze leave, but it's pretty cut and dry to me. I just hope that Boozer doesn't end up in the Western Conference somewhere...
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Racer X
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,913
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 20, 2007
- Location: S L C
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Korver's is a player option as well.
The facts are these . . . I dont envy KOC's job whatsoever.
The facts are these . . . I dont envy KOC's job whatsoever.

Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,247
- And1: 14
- Joined: Apr 02, 2006
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
A couple more metrics: Memo's @ 56% from the floor, Booze and Milsap are an even 55% and change. Booze and Milsap also shoot exactly the same from the free throw line. Milsap doesn't have the jumper or the ambidexterity that Boozer does, but Milsap is a better rebounder and defender. With the offense on the team that can come from DWill, Memo, Miles, AK and Brewer, do we really need Boozer's offensive skillset at the risk of losing both Memo and Milsap?
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- HammerDunk
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,126
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Does anyone have the numbers on foul per minute on Sap VS Booz?

Word is, South Beach is ecstatic that they
won't be seeing Millsaps talents again this season...
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Couple more wrinkles:
1) It is entirely possible that we will not have any draft picks in 2009. We probably won't get New York's, and if we finish top-8 Minnesota will get ours. (We still have a 2nd rounder if I remember right, but won't let that get in the way of our tax problem.)
2) We have to see what will happen with Harpring. I wouldn't be surprised if he retired after this season (presumably to take a job with the org), but we can't count on that. If he does, especially for medical reasons, we can apply to have his salary taken off the cap.
The rest of your assumptions look pretty good. I think the best thing we can do, quite frankly, is wait. If Booz wants the max, there's not a lot of teams that can give it to him...only Portland, Memphis and Utah if I remember right. If he wants to go elsewhere, he'll have to take less money, perhaps a lot less. That may work in our favour.
And as much as Boozer is the best player on this list...he can be somewhat replaced (with AK and Millsap). Okur, not so much, unless Koufos comes a LONG way quickly.
(As much I expressed a desire for patience, it may not be as easy as that either...Memphis could force our hand by offering $7M+ to Millsap instead. We'd have a week to match it or let him walk for nothing; then it's decision time.)
1) It is entirely possible that we will not have any draft picks in 2009. We probably won't get New York's, and if we finish top-8 Minnesota will get ours. (We still have a 2nd rounder if I remember right, but won't let that get in the way of our tax problem.)
2) We have to see what will happen with Harpring. I wouldn't be surprised if he retired after this season (presumably to take a job with the org), but we can't count on that. If he does, especially for medical reasons, we can apply to have his salary taken off the cap.
The rest of your assumptions look pretty good. I think the best thing we can do, quite frankly, is wait. If Booz wants the max, there's not a lot of teams that can give it to him...only Portland, Memphis and Utah if I remember right. If he wants to go elsewhere, he'll have to take less money, perhaps a lot less. That may work in our favour.
And as much as Boozer is the best player on this list...he can be somewhat replaced (with AK and Millsap). Okur, not so much, unless Koufos comes a LONG way quickly.
(As much I expressed a desire for patience, it may not be as easy as that either...Memphis could force our hand by offering $7M+ to Millsap instead. We'd have a week to match it or let him walk for nothing; then it's decision time.)
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Sap will get more than 6mil per.
Okur may not opt out
Okur may not opt out
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 912
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Wolverine wrote:Sap will get more than 6mil per.
Okur may not opt out
Good points, I think that Sap is really looking like a starter in this league and may get somewhere around 6-9mil/year. Ugh, what a ugly situation though, again A LOT will depend on what transpires in the playoffs.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- corona
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,940
- And1: 234
- Joined: Apr 29, 2006
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
HammerDunk wrote:Does anyone have the numbers on foul per minute on Sap VS Booz?
last season (since it's a bigger sample size), millsap averaged 5.5 fouls in the amount of minutes that boozer played (a little under 35)...compared to boozer's 3.6 fouls.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Ming Kong!
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,480
- And1: 31
- Joined: Nov 21, 2002
- Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
As much as I like Boozer, let him go, it's not worth spending 18million more at the PF position when you already have Millsap, and AK can play backup PF minutes too. Also we could use the projected lottery pick in 2010 to get a PF, that guy would cost us some 16-17 less than Boozer would, and we'll have money to resign Brewer in 2010, and then Miles in 2012. You got to look ahead, and resigning Boozer for a 5yr $100M deal would leave no room to make any moves until 2014.
Okur/Koufos/Fesenko
Millsap/2010 lottery pick
Miles/Kirilenko/Harpring
Brewer/Korver/Almond
Williams/Price/Knight
We're fine
Okur/Koufos/Fesenko
Millsap/2010 lottery pick
Miles/Kirilenko/Harpring
Brewer/Korver/Almond
Williams/Price/Knight
We're fine
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Boozer 18 mil - Millsap 8mil is he really worth the extra 10 or so mil a year?
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
If the Jazz let Boozer leave, and have Millsap start they need another scoring big man coming off the bench. Last night was a perfect example of why Boozer is so important. When other people aren't making shots, Boozer can always give you easy baskets. The Jazz would need to get another 20 ppg low post guy to fill in for him, or Millsap would really have to develop a dynamite back to the basket game.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,011
- And1: 17,527
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Here is the way I see the offseason going down:
1) Likely to opt out: Boozer
Obvious reasons, Booze is worth more than we pay him, lots of teams are going to want a 20/10 power forward in their front line, etc. etc. Memphis, Portland, Minnisota, Utah, Detroit, and Miami should all have enough money to sign him. I think that the most likely team to go after him is Detroit (to replace Sheed).
2) Not opting out: Memo, Korver
Both are really good fits with the Jazz and seem happy. If Memo does opt out we can resign him for about the same amount of money he gets now, but over a longer period of time (say 4 yrs, 36 million). If Korver opts out he'll be gone.
3) Coming back: Millsap, Price
Both have done great in their current roles, I don't think that we will be able to resign Boozer for what we want, and if we do it will likely be a sign and trade for a decent power forward, a filler and picks. Price is pretty much a lock to return in his current role.
4) Not returning: Knight, Boozer, Collins, Almond, Harpring, Fess
Collins and Harp are at the end of the line--neither has enough left in the tank for another season. It has become clear that Almond is not in our future plans, and I just don't see Knight returning with how well Price is playing as Deron's back up.
1) Likely to opt out: Boozer
Obvious reasons, Booze is worth more than we pay him, lots of teams are going to want a 20/10 power forward in their front line, etc. etc. Memphis, Portland, Minnisota, Utah, Detroit, and Miami should all have enough money to sign him. I think that the most likely team to go after him is Detroit (to replace Sheed).
2) Not opting out: Memo, Korver
Both are really good fits with the Jazz and seem happy. If Memo does opt out we can resign him for about the same amount of money he gets now, but over a longer period of time (say 4 yrs, 36 million). If Korver opts out he'll be gone.
3) Coming back: Millsap, Price
Both have done great in their current roles, I don't think that we will be able to resign Boozer for what we want, and if we do it will likely be a sign and trade for a decent power forward, a filler and picks. Price is pretty much a lock to return in his current role.
4) Not returning: Knight, Boozer, Collins, Almond, Harpring, Fess
Collins and Harp are at the end of the line--neither has enough left in the tank for another season. It has become clear that Almond is not in our future plans, and I just don't see Knight returning with how well Price is playing as Deron's back up.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Batronuj wrote: Last night was a perfect example of why Boozer is so important. When other people aren't making shots, Boozer can always give you easy baskets. The Jazz would need to get another 20 ppg low post guy to fill in for him, or Millsap would really have to develop a dynamite back to the basket game.
Don't forget we were down Kirilenko also
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
If Harp leaves i wouldn't mind keeping Mo around
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- The Sheik
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Irvine, Ca
-
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Wolverine wrote:If Harp leaves i wouldn't mind keeping Mo around
How is Harpring gonna leave? He isnt going to miss any games because of his knee. He sits on the bench next yr and gets 6.5 mil. Its gonna take a career ending injury(God forbid) for Harp to not end his career here.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,335
- And1: 14
- Joined: Oct 29, 2001
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
Maybe he can have a golf cart injury like Collins that will end his career.
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,667
- And1: 365
- Joined: Feb 05, 2008
- Location: Idaho Falls
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
did you ever think that god heard our prayers and allowed or forced that cart to tip so Jerry coulndt give him millsaps/kirilenko/kufos minutes?
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
- The Sheik
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Irvine, Ca
-
Re: 2009-2010 State of the Jazz
I would officially like to give up on Fes. Decline his option, bring in Tomic.