Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,751
And1: 32,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1301 » by fleet » Fri Apr 26, 2024 10:39 pm

TheStig wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
fleet wrote:Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”


Pretty much this. Fields frankly didn't deserve being built around. He wasn't a good enough QB to build a team around his legs

Can we stop pretending Fields never had anything? He had Moore and Kmet. Both were top 10 at their position. Fields couldn't do much with them. The Raiders hired his former OC and have no QB and you never even heard a peep of a rumor he could go there.

You know who was set up for failure? Mac Jones. No weapons, not even an OC and he flashed some talent in his rookie year. That's the guy who is the real victim.

And Mooney, who just got a nice contract. Fields completely was unable to use this year. There’s no excuse for a truly good quarterback to look bad. Maybe diminished effectiveness on the margins sure. But good quarterbacks show you.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,698
And1: 3,903
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1302 » by TheStig » Fri Apr 26, 2024 10:46 pm

fleet wrote:
TheStig wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
Pretty much this. Fields frankly didn't deserve being built around. He wasn't a good enough QB to build a team around his legs

Can we stop pretending Fields never had anything? He had Moore and Kmet. Both were top 10 at their position. Fields couldn't do much with them. The Raiders hired his former OC and have no QB and you never even heard a peep of a rumor he could go there.

You know who was set up for failure? Mac Jones. No weapons, not even an OC and he flashed some talent in his rookie year. That's the guy who is the real victim.

And Mooney, who just got a nice contract. Fields completely was unable to use this year. There’s no excuse for a truly good quarterback to look bad. Maybe diminished effectiveness on the margins sure. But good quarterbacks show you.

Excellent point. I think Mooney will be much better with Kirk.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 20,966
And1: 3,522
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1303 » by panthermark » Fri Apr 26, 2024 10:48 pm

OMG - I was gone for awhile waiting for the draft, and the whole thing is still tiring.


In the end, everyone was right (or wrong) depending on your position.
Didn't like Fields? He's gone, CW is here.
Didn't like the OC? He's gone, as he clearly wasn't trusted enough to be the guy for CW.
Didn't like the center? They are gone.
Didn't think there was enough talent at the skill positions outside of Moore and Kmet? A Pro-bowl RB and WR, along with another top 10 pick at WR were added.

Pretty much everything that was pointed at and argued about has been turned over. Time to move on.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
User avatar
Bulls69
Head Coach
Posts: 6,494
And1: 416
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: LA via Chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1304 » by Bulls69 » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:08 pm

fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


This dude again ...

Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”

I strongly disagree this pick from the Panthers was the perfect storm for the Bears. They were able to reset the Quarterback salary cap plus Ryan couldn’t afford to have Caleb blow up like CJ did last season if the Bears didn’t have the first pick Fields would still be a Bear.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Knicksgod wrote: I know LeBron won't go to Chicago. There could be another surprise team, but if he leaves Cleveland, then teaming with Bosh and Gallo in NYC is a likely scenario.
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,194
And1: 7,436
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1305 » by Susan » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:13 pm

fleet wrote:
TheStig wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
Pretty much this. Fields frankly didn't deserve being built around. He wasn't a good enough QB to build a team around his legs

Can we stop pretending Fields never had anything? He had Moore and Kmet. Both were top 10 at their position. Fields couldn't do much with them. The Raiders hired his former OC and have no QB and you never even heard a peep of a rumor he could go there.

You know who was set up for failure? Mac Jones. No weapons, not even an OC and he flashed some talent in his rookie year. That's the guy who is the real victim.

And Mooney, who just got a nice contract. Fields completely was unable to use this year. There’s no excuse for a truly good quarterback to look bad. Maybe diminished effectiveness on the margins sure. But good quarterbacks show you.


Who gave him that contract?

Atlanta. They just signed Kirk and drafted Penix.

Just let the Fields **** go. He'll be able to show what he was in the coming years - no need to talk about it endlessly.

Enjoy that we have Keenan, Caleb, DJ and Rome. We were discussing **** Byron Pringle and Chase Claypool previously.
User avatar
Chicago-Bull-E
RealGM
Posts: 16,011
And1: 7,314
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1306 » by Chicago-Bull-E » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:22 pm

Love Coleman and McConkey for those QBs and franchises.

Not surprised AD Mitchell fell below them. Dude will be a diva from day 1. A good receiver too, but a diva.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
User avatar
Chicago-Bull-E
RealGM
Posts: 16,011
And1: 7,314
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1307 » by Chicago-Bull-E » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:24 pm

Alt and McConkey for the Chargers is solid. Giving Herbert high quality help quickly.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,751
And1: 32,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1308 » by fleet » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:37 pm

Chicago-Bull-E wrote:Love Coleman and McConkey for those QBs and franchises.

Not surprised AD Mitchell fell below them. Dude will be a diva from day 1. A good receiver too, but a diva.

Supposed to have diabetes issues that make him uneven attitude
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,751
And1: 32,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1309 » by fleet » Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:49 pm

Bulls69 wrote:
fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


This dude again ...

Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”

I strongly disagree this pick from the Panthers was the perfect storm for the Bears. They were able to reset the Quarterback salary cap plus Ryan couldn’t afford to have Caleb blow up like CJ did last season if the Bears didn’t have the first pick Fields would still be a Bear.


I think that’s fiction. The league quarterback market just strongly indicated that these rookie quarterbacks are more valuable as prospects than Fields, who was only worth a conditional 6th. We would be looking at JJ, Penix, or Nix in Chicago if we didn’t have the top pick. And the top 3 guys weren’t able to be traded up for manifestly.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1310 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:01 am

Bulls69 wrote:
fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


This dude again ...

Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”

I strongly disagree this pick from the Panthers was the perfect storm for the Bears. They were able to reset the Quarterback salary cap plus Ryan couldn’t afford to have Caleb blow up like CJ did last season if the Bears didn’t have the first pick Fields would still be a Bear.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

that brings up an interesting alternate reality scenario. expected values of the picks headed into the season were 9 (panthers) and 11 or 12 (bears). would poles have traded fields in that scenario? if so, surely he would have then packaged the picks to move up and make sure he did not end up empty handed
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1311 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:05 am

fleet wrote:
Bulls69 wrote:
fleet wrote:Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”

I strongly disagree this pick from the Panthers was the perfect storm for the Bears. They were able to reset the Quarterback salary cap plus Ryan couldn’t afford to have Caleb blow up like CJ did last season if the Bears didn’t have the first pick Fields would still be a Bear.


I think that’s fiction. The league quarterback market just strongly indicated that these rookie quarterbacks are more valuable as prospects than Fields, who was only worth a conditional 6th. We would be looking at JJ, Penix, or Nix in Chicago if we didn’t have the top pick. And the top 3 guys weren’t able to be traded up for manifestly.

at the same time, though, poles might have said "****, for a 5th rounder i'll just keep justin and build the roster"

but thank you lovie, thank you bryce and thank you jim harbaugh
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1312 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:08 am

TheStig wrote:
fleet wrote:
TheStig wrote:Can we stop pretending Fields never had anything? He had Moore and Kmet. Both were top 10 at their position. Fields couldn't do much with them. The Raiders hired his former OC and have no QB and you never even heard a peep of a rumor he could go there.

You know who was set up for failure? Mac Jones. No weapons, not even an OC and he flashed some talent in his rookie year. That's the guy who is the real victim.

And Mooney, who just got a nice contract. Fields completely was unable to use this year. There’s no excuse for a truly good quarterback to look bad. Maybe diminished effectiveness on the margins sure. But good quarterbacks show you.

Excellent point. I think Mooney will be much better with Kirk.

to be fair, justin was great throwing to moore and kmet. but agree with the premise
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,751
And1: 32,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1313 » by fleet » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:10 am

TheStig wrote:
fleet wrote:
TheStig wrote:Can we stop pretending Fields never had anything? He had Moore and Kmet. Both were top 10 at their position. Fields couldn't do much with them. The Raiders hired his former OC and have no QB and you never even heard a peep of a rumor he could go there.

You know who was set up for failure? Mac Jones. No weapons, not even an OC and he flashed some talent in his rookie year. That's the guy who is the real victim.

And Mooney, who just got a nice contract. Fields completely was unable to use this year. There’s no excuse for a truly good quarterback to look bad. Maybe diminished effectiveness on the margins sure. But good quarterbacks show you.

Excellent point. I think Mooney will be much better with Kirk.

Surely. He was rediscovered as a target by Tyson Bagent.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1314 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:11 am

HearshotKDS wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Dresden wrote:About Penix going to ATL, I don't think it was a dumb move at all. They likely just fell in love with his potential, and even though they just signed Cousins, probably thought to themselves that this could be the last good chance they have to land a top QB prospect. I think Penix was very under-rated, plus his age and injuries- but talent wise, he could be as good as anyone in this draft. People might be looking back at this years from now and saying 'wow, ATL made a smart move".

It's also possible they heard that other teams would take him fairly early, so there was no good opportunity to trade back and still get him. Anyway, these are the scenarios I can think of that make sense of this.

In any case, it sure worked out well for CHI! We got our guy in Odunze (although I will be closely following Bower's career as well wondering if we took the right guy- but most likely we did.)



I thought the Penix move was terrible.

If you’re in love with his potential, don’t spend $40M on a QB that’ll keep him shelved until he’s 27 years old. And if you’re not sold on Penix’s ability to become a starter on his rookie contract, don’t use the 8th pick on him.

Using that cap *and* the pick on QB is just a horrible allocation of resources. It smacks of ownership wanting one thing (Kirk) and the GM wanting another.


There's just no coherent strategic synergy behind both moves. You sign Cousins to that deal because you want to max out a 3-4 year window of competitive play. You draft a relatively NFL ready 24 year old rookie at #8 to be the franchise QB in the next 1-2 years. Kirk isnt the type of QB you bring in to be a 1-2 year bridge, Penix doesnt seem like a great fit for a stash and develop QB although you have to acknowledge teams aren't exactly spoiled for choice with what high end QB prospects are available to them.

This offseason does not bring ATL significantly closer to contention:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/team/transactions/_/name/atl/atlanta-falcons

And the biggest piece of draft capital they are likely to have in Kirk Cousins tenure is not able to help a Cousins led team compete. ATL probably locking themselves in to a situation with Penix where they have to decide on a 5th year option or extension on a player who has been Cousins back up for 3 years in '27. Feels an awful lot like a "dont want to pick a direction so ill put 1 foot on both sides of the fence" move that Bulls fans should be all too familiar with.

mccarthy would have made more sense, but even then...
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged
User avatar
Chicago-Bull-E
RealGM
Posts: 16,011
And1: 7,314
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1315 » by Chicago-Bull-E » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:15 am

What were the betting odds that Mitchell’s Texas teammates Sweat, Worthy, and Brooks all got drafted before him? Holy cow
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
User avatar
Chicago-Bull-E
RealGM
Posts: 16,011
And1: 7,314
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1316 » by Chicago-Bull-E » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:22 am

Caleb’s twitter is awesome now.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
sco
RealGM
Posts: 23,685
And1: 7,674
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1317 » by sco » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:24 am

PaKii94 wrote:
fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


This dude again ...

Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”


Pretty much this. Fields frankly didn't deserve being built around. He wasn't a good enough QB to build a team around his legs

You are right. Also though, it raises the point that it is a bad idea to bring in a rookie QB to run the team before there are the underpinnings to make the job doable. We never should have drafted Fields to begin with, but that said, it was his play that earned us the last couple years picks.
:clap:
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 15,849
And1: 7,526
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1318 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:29 am

The late intel on AD Mitchell really killed him. Goddamn.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1319 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:32 am

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


This dude again ...

Yes, Fields was a great victim, and CJ is well informed how this team was built the last 2 years certainly. It sucks that the Bears didn’t figure that out, and get “The haul”. And more than a 6th rounder for such a victim of circumstances. Pittsburgh should have picked up Fields’ option too. All Fields needs is “more help”

They did a crap job of putting a good team around Fields and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people acknowledging that. Does it mean that we shouldn’t have traded him? No. But the facts are what they are. Just let it go already.

those are not facts. here are some facts:

-bears O-line was 6th in the league in avg. pocket time
-bears RBs averaged well over 4 yards a carry
-bears had 2nd most rush attempts in league, which along w/ fields's running ability forced opponents to load up the box
-kmet was 9th rated TE in PFF grade
-moore was 10th rated WR

despite these strong advantages, fields was 23rd of 30 in pass QBR
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,088
And1: 12,589
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1320 » by dice » Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:39 am

nomorezorro wrote:
Chicago-Bull-E wrote:No chance I want a rookie center calling out reads for Caleb.

I guess if you think he’s talented enough sit for a bit. Much larger needs elsewhere to me.


letting jpj sit for a year would probably be a good idea. he only had a year of starting experience in college

bates has 2 games of starting center experience. and he wasn't good at starting guard
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged

Return to Chicago Bulls