Fl_Flash wrote:Mind you, I have no basis for what I'm about to state... I think McDermott showed he was at least equal to Dunleavy last season - Thibs just buried him to spite Gar and Pax. Sounds like an incredibly petty and stupid thing for a coach to do. I get the impression that there was quite a bit of egoism going on between the front office and the coaching staff. I think that Butlers observation that McDermott was killing it in practice has some validity to it. Things had become so damaged between GarPax and Thibs that he would refuse to play a guy that I bet the front office was clamoring to be played - just to spite them. Again - no basis for this line of thinking - just conjecture.
All we can do is to see what unfolds this season. I get the impression that some folks think that Mike Dunleavy is some sort of great player and that it would need a "Larry Bird-like" showing for anyone to beat him out. Mike Dunleavy is a 15 MPG backup who, by default, was a starter on a really good team. It's not that MDJ is all that great, it's just that the other options were less than him. I don't think it will take all that much for Mcd (or snell for that matter) to supplant an aging Dunleavy for the SF spot.
Well you admitted no basis. Last year Dunleavy was a rather average-ish player, sub average for a starter probably, but Doug was a terrible player. You can blame some of that on low minutes, which may or may not be true, but I don't think it can be argued that what we saw, as the fans, was a very unproductive, bad player. On both ends.
So it's not like Doug was out there getting things done in 10 minutes, then getting yanked, to where it was obvious that this guy had all kind of ability as a rookie to be worth putting out there.
As far as getting it done in practice though, how many times did we hear the same thing about Derrick Rose over the last 3 years? Many times, but it seemed to be all fluff talk, because it rarely ever carried over to real games. Was that on Thibs too. Or maybe people just like to talk positive about their teammates.
Just the other week Westbrook said Derrick, "looked like Derrick Rose" whatever that means, preumably it was taken to mean 'he's back'. But what is Russell - or anyone speaking about a friend - supposed to say, that Derrick, "Just isn't quite the same as he used to be." Then it would be blown up into a big comment. Most of that stuff I consider just throw-away comments with little value.