Mark K wrote:I came into this thread (quoting no one) and added that Butler shouldn't escape criticism for some of the possessions he had. That's not a controversial take.
No one said it was a controversial take. In fact, I agreed right away that Butler does make bad hero ball plays.
You then quoted my post, suggesting the anti-Butler takes or ones that are critical of him are done for two reasons:
No I did not say anti-Butler takes, I said the reason every PG loss seems to become dominated with talk of that specific issue to the virtual exclusion of all other talk about a game.
I fall into the first category because I want to tank.
No you don't. You want to tank, but you don't need to blame every loss on Butler to justify your reasons to tank right?
dumbass one-liner posts that are critical of Butler?
I wish they were only one liners, instead of paragraphs and paragraphs.
