dougthonus wrote:League Circles wrote:dougthonus wrote:
I assume you're joking (at least about the Bulls entertaining one).
It's sort of funny because in a mathematical world, there might be some line an extension makes sense, but in a practical world, Lonzo only takes one if he himself doesn't think he can make it back, so you'd always lose.
Yeah I know the Bulls wouldn't and shouldn't consider it but I wouldn't put it past Lavar to ask for one with a straight face lol. And yes mathematically it would only make sense for the Bulls if it was like a 4-5 year deal worth like 4 or 5 mil per year max as a gamble. But very little chance Ball would agree to that unless he had a very strong preference for stability/security.
I was thinking kind of the same thing, except that Lonzo only takes that deal if he knows he's not coming back ever.
Yeah players would be stupid to accept an availability discount, as much as it sucks for fans to see their teams hamstrung by massive contracts for guys who don't play.
. Hes done. Let's move on...
