Ice Man wrote:Gant wrote:But as I recall the play-in was introduced along with altered lottery odds to lessen tanking. While the lottery odds somewhat discouraged tanking among the worst teams, the play-in lessened it among the borderline playoff teams. It also created fierce competition to rise to the 6th seed. In those ways plus generating interest it's worked.
Fair points. Those are minor issues, which for me are not worth further cheapening the playoff structure (which already has too many meh teams). But I would guess that the league plus most fans are happy enough with those effects and think that the play-in has been a success.
I mean, it's not a big deal. I just wait until the real playoffs begin to start paying attention. (Even when my own team is in the play-in.)
the structure of the play-in is good. what will draw criticism is when a good team (particularly in a large market) loses a play-in game to a significantly worse team and misses the playoffs. that is both counterproductive to the objective of larger ratings AND competitively unfair. but when 7-10 have similar records it's totally fine
of course, 6 teams per conference in the playoffs would be more optimal. but it's completely impractical and would never happen anyway