How Bad are AKME?
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,499
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Apr 28, 2017
Re: How Bad are AKME?
The grade has progressively gotten worse yearly, almost monthly. I was onboard with the idea upon signing, after a year i was at about a C+/B-, after two years at a C/C-, now its a D, they've done nearly nothing but bad moves.
I'm finally to the point where I can argue with myself that GarPax may have been better still around here.
I'm finally to the point where I can argue with myself that GarPax may have been better still around here.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,440
- And1: 769
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Re: How Bad are AKME?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Adrian Wojnarowski's latest Bulls intel from Woj Pod this AM:<br><br>"DeMar DeRozan is a player [the 76ers] have talked about. Maybe not so much today, but in previous days.<br>I think it's harder for Chicago to do some of these deals with contending teams because they want players back.…</p>— CHGO Bulls (@CHGO_Bulls) <a href="?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,440
- And1: 769
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Re: How Bad are AKME?
InsideInfo wrote:<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Adrian Wojnarowski's latest Bulls intel from Woj Pod this AM:<br><br>"DeMar DeRozan is a player [the 76ers] have talked about. Maybe not so much today, but in previous days.<br>I think it's harder for Chicago to do some of these deals with contending teams because they want players back.…</p>— CHGO Bulls (@CHGO_Bulls) <a href="?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Sorry about the weird formatting...i dont pust tweets to realgm often.
If this is true, this is some of the worst ive seen as a bulls fan in 30 years.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- RSP83
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,772
- And1: 3,922
- Joined: Sep 14, 2010
Re: How Bad are AKME?
AKME is like that guy in the casino who started really hot then start losing but keep betting despite quickly going broke. Somebody need to call the security and pull him away from the table.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- Guy
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,630
- And1: 356
- Joined: Nov 28, 2011
- Location: Doghouse
Re: How Bad are AKME?
RSP83 wrote:AKME is like that guy in the casino who started really hot then start losing but keep betting despite quickly going broke. Somebody need to call the security and pull him away from the table.
I see what you're saying but he's literally broke and not looking for a job at this point.
Raptors Board
Lord_Zedd wrote:That was the best worst game I've ever seen in a long time.
The Bulls are forever our fathers
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,233
- And1: 1,216
- Joined: Jan 26, 2002
- Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
- Contact:
Re: How Bad are AKME?
Should have kept Garpax. At least let their rebuild project go through its course. They were fired before we knew what we had in Lauri, Coby etc..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- TheSuzerain
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,750
- And1: 10,884
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Re: How Bad are AKME?
That I'm nodding along to "should have kept GarPax" is just an extremely sad state of affairs.
Just a miserable fan experience in recent memory.
Just a miserable fan experience in recent memory.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- nomorezorro
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,159
- And1: 8,908
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
- Location: appropriately compensated
Re: How Bad are AKME?
you gotta fire this guy this offseason. i don't even think "trying to stay afloat instead of doing a tear-down rebuild" is an inherently bad team-building philosophy, but the thing is, he is objectively doing really really bad at executing his already-questionable vision
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 247
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 26, 2008
Re: How Bad are AKME?
The bulls are in a very bad situation. I really don't see ownership firing AKME anytime soon and I just don't understand how they can stand pat with a super mediocre team. At least GarPax were good at drafting...
Bench the vets, play the kids!
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- NecessaryEvil
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,500
- And1: 7,131
- Joined: Jun 12, 2014
Re: How Bad are AKME?
As long as the Bulls are #1 in attendance, I'm not sure how badly they would be viewed amongst there bosses.
I hope the fanbase goes on a #FireAKME campaign the same they did for GarPax, billboard and all.
But here's the thing, I don't think it's about the FO at this point, because it just remains the same.
This is about the team ownership.
I hope the fanbase goes on a #FireAKME campaign the same they did for GarPax, billboard and all.
But here's the thing, I don't think it's about the FO at this point, because it just remains the same.
This is about the team ownership.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- NecessaryEvil
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,500
- And1: 7,131
- Joined: Jun 12, 2014
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,268
- And1: 5,699
- Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Re: How Bad are AKME?
nomorezorro wrote:you gotta fire this guy this offseason. i don't even think "trying to stay afloat instead of doing a tear-down rebuild" is an inherently bad team-building philosophy, but the thing is, he is objectively doing really really bad at executing his already-questionable vision
Fire him? Ownership is likely thrilled with the job they've been doing. No chance they get fired.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,268
- And1: 5,699
- Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Re: How Bad are AKME?
Ok, that's an actual "WTF?!?!" moment. Holy hell...
If that's true, then AKME truly is incompetent as everyone thought. Ownership is to blame for a lot, but AKME is driving this team further into the ground.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,420
- And1: 5,600
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
- Location: Limits, like fears, are often just an illusion.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
They are an F. I don't see how anyone can think differently. Its starts with attitude and approach and they accept mediocrity and haven't shown the ability to adjust their approach when things aren't working. Its a recipe for complete and utter disaster which is exactly where the organization is heading.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,268
- And1: 5,699
- Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Re: How Bad are AKME?
I would argue that this deserves its own thread.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 41,835
- And1: 23,825
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: How Bad are AKME?
I don't believe this in the slightest. This seems like spin to me.
Why so serious?
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,420
- And1: 5,600
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
- Location: Limits, like fears, are often just an illusion.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
kulaz3000 wrote:
I don't believe this in the slightest. This seems like spin to me.
No, he said it in the interview. Its not spin. This is who he is.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,420
- And1: 5,600
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
- Location: Limits, like fears, are often just an illusion.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
BigUps wrote:kulaz3000 wrote:
I don't believe this in the slightest. This seems like spin to me.
No, he said it in the interview. Its not spin. This is who he is.
To prove this further.
Re: How Bad are AKME?
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 41,835
- And1: 23,825
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: How Bad are AKME?
BigUps wrote:kulaz3000 wrote:
I don't believe this in the slightest. This seems like spin to me.
No, he said it in the interview. Its not spin. This is who he is.
I'll tell you why it's spin. The ownership is paying his salary, they don't want the team to tank because they've been in that position before, thus AK is falling on the sword and saving the ownership face by saying it was an option to him, but he opted against it and he continues to have a job, whilst continuing to throw out a mediocre team.
Why so serious?
Re: How Bad are AKME?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,668
- And1: 1,930
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
Re: How Bad are AKME?
To me, AK and ME or if they're a matched pair, are betting their jobs on the team that opens next season looking like a top 6 playoff team. And doing it.
Michael Reinsdorf has given them enough room to make the moves they have. I'll bet ownership signed on when the Vucevic trade was made, when they extended Billy, when they brought in DeRozan and Ball and when they maxed out Zach. The other drafts, bench guys like Caruso, Carter, Craig, buying the pick for Phillips were minor basketball moves.
On the floor I think Billy makes the call on who starts without any interference from upstairs. So standing pat at three deadlines, even continuity, not adding an actual PF, is all AKME betting the plan they have been following is going to pay off. I think that means the post season this year, minus Zach.
I personally think Lonzo returns healthy, I don't care who thinks he's Humpty Dumpty, I've got my view. That makes the biggest decisions, keeping DeRozan and second trading Zach or not. Minor choice is extending PWill. Everybody else stays, and you hope Ayo shoots more, Phillips gets stronger, Terry makes progress all around and the draft pick is a useful player.
They have chosen to stay the course and if one year from today they are a .500 team it's a bust because they bet that their plan would lead to success and there was no progress. And they're gone.
Michael Reinsdorf has given them enough room to make the moves they have. I'll bet ownership signed on when the Vucevic trade was made, when they extended Billy, when they brought in DeRozan and Ball and when they maxed out Zach. The other drafts, bench guys like Caruso, Carter, Craig, buying the pick for Phillips were minor basketball moves.
On the floor I think Billy makes the call on who starts without any interference from upstairs. So standing pat at three deadlines, even continuity, not adding an actual PF, is all AKME betting the plan they have been following is going to pay off. I think that means the post season this year, minus Zach.
I personally think Lonzo returns healthy, I don't care who thinks he's Humpty Dumpty, I've got my view. That makes the biggest decisions, keeping DeRozan and second trading Zach or not. Minor choice is extending PWill. Everybody else stays, and you hope Ayo shoots more, Phillips gets stronger, Terry makes progress all around and the draft pick is a useful player.
They have chosen to stay the course and if one year from today they are a .500 team it's a bust because they bet that their plan would lead to success and there was no progress. And they're gone.